PoinT_BlanK — CS2 Stats

76561198111263579[U:1:150997851]

2,945Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating3.2 Learning
Premier CS Rating2,941Grey band · top ~87.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#11952 of 15473 tracked
FaceitLevel 1 · 406 ELOTop 100.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGPoinT_BlanKFACEITLevel 1 · 406 ELOSTANDINGTop 100.0% of rankedPREMIER2,941 · Grey bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim16
Positioning33
Utility61

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT4555Last 10045%Win rateLLWWWLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim1.6
Aggression3.7
Utility6.1
Positioning3.3
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch2.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 72% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 41% on CT to 18% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 733ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 70% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim1.6
Positioning3.3
Utility6.1
Mechanics4.4
Opening Duels1.4
Win Impact7.2

Composite 3.2/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time730ms−7ms
first ⅓ avg 737ms → last ⅓ avg 730ms
Headshot accuracy13.6%−3.6%
first ⅓ avg 17.1% → last ⅓ avg 13.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.12Best rating — inferno 13–9
131Biggest win — inferno
4Longest win streak
L2Current streak
75In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 53% over 38nukeWeakest map · 20% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B38201853%-0.03
mirageC25101540%-0.04
infernoB147750%-0.00
nukeD102820%-0.05
anubisC52340%-0.03
cache43175%-0.02
ancient41325%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

34Matches
50%Win rate
0.63Avg K/D
54.4ADR
28%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

31%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1136%0.6110.1
Dust21070%0.6412.2
Inferno743%0.7010.9
Nuke540%0.609.2
Overpass1100%0.539.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.5%Headshot accuracy
23.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
22.2%Spray accuracy
69.7%Counter-strafing
10.1°Preaim
733msReaction time
17.9%T opening success
41.0%CT opening success
0.74Enemies flashed / flash
5.1%Flash assists
13.53HE damage / grenade
4.69Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 13.5351% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Best CS2 Settings

    Slow first shots are as often a setup problem as a reflex one — framerate, sensitivity and crosshair visibility all move this number.

    Reaction time 733.3987ms — above the 700ms mark we flag

    Aim Training
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 17.9329% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke10–13-0.0911%30 Jul
dust28–13-0.0525%29 Jul
anubis13–9-0.0324%29 Jul
inferno13–6-0.0913%29 Jul
dust213–10-0.1020%29 Jul
dust25–130.014%29 Jul
mirage13–70.0617%29 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0115%29 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0219%29 Jul
cache13–11-0.0317%29 Jul
dust27–13-0.0517%29 Jul
inferno13–9-0.0425%28 Jul
inferno13–10-0.0624%28 Jul
nuke4–13-0.100%28 Jul
dust20–13-0.1118%28 Jul
inferno13–1-0.029%28 Jul
mirage8–130.0114%28 Jul
dust213–11-0.035%28 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0411%28 Jul
dust216–14-0.099%27 Jul
ancient2–13-0.086%27 Jul
nuke10–13-0.079%27 Jul
dust213–2-0.0020%27 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0314%27 Jul
dust213–100.010%26 Jul
nuke11–13-0.0724%26 Jul
anubis6–13-0.110%26 Jul
inferno13–90.1214%26 Jul
dust213–60.0612%26 Jul
mirage13–90.037%26 Jul
dust213–2-0.0030%26 Jul
dust22–13-0.103%26 Jul
anubis9–130.0114%26 Jul
dust212–16-0.0419%26 Jul
cache11–13-0.0326%26 Jul
dust211–13-0.0615%25 Jul
inferno8–130.009%25 Jul
mirage2–13-0.109%25 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0810%25 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0214%25 Jul
dust23–13-0.044%25 Jul
dust26–13-0.0511%25 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0315%25 Jul
mirage13–4-0.1017%24 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0614%24 Jul
dust213–4-0.048%24 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0523%24 Jul
dust23–13-0.097%24 Jul
dust213–5-0.0123%24 Jul
nuke7–13-0.0323%24 Jul
mirage6–13-0.007%24 Jul
dust213–80.0517%24 Jul
inferno5–13-0.0219%24 Jul
mirage13–8-0.037%24 Jul
dust213–80.0314%24 Jul
dust213–6-0.0217%24 Jul
mirage3–13-0.1225%24 Jul
mirage13–10.0121%24 Jul
dust211–13-0.0718%23 Jul
inferno13–7-0.0611%23 Jul
nuke13–5-0.0011%23 Jul
dust213–90.015%23 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0314%23 Jul
inferno13–70.114%23 Jul
dust213–10-0.1014%23 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0515%23 Jul
cache16–14-0.0513%23 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0629%20 Jul
cache13–70.019%20 Jul
nuke13–6-0.0124%20 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0410%20 Jul
dust211–130.0120%20 Jul
dust212–16-0.0121%20 Jul
dust26–13-0.1316%19 Jul
mirage13–5-0.0813%19 Jul
dust210–13-0.058%19 Jul
dust213–20.0211%19 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0116%19 Jul
dust213–90.0614%19 Jul
dust213–20.0943%19 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0315%18 Jul
inferno6–130.0419%18 Jul
mirage16–14-0.0918%18 Jul
dust25–13-0.0616%18 Jul
inferno4–130.0120%18 Jul
nuke6–130.0311%17 Jul
dust213–100.0616%17 Jul
anubis13–50.0216%17 Jul
inferno8–130.0314%17 Jul
inferno5–130.0215%17 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0417%17 Jul
dust27–13-0.0517%17 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0624%17 Jul
nuke5–13-0.0720%16 Jul
dust27–13-0.0412%16 Jul
nuke8–13-0.0620%16 Jul
mirage8–130.0315%16 Jul
dust213–110.0212%16 Jul
ancient13–20.0617%16 Jul
dust213–11-0.0219%16 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →