SoLK — CS2 Stats

76561198111015041[U:1:150749313]✓ No bans

1,557Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.7 SolidHybrid Rifler

Premier CS Rating13,142Blue band · top ~38.2% of ranked players (population est.)

WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim68

Positioning63

Utility75

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY44–56Last 10044%Win rateWWLWWLWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.05 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.8

Aggression10.0

Utility7.5

Positioning6.3

Opening Duels4.7

Clutch2.8

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashesHigh utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like ZywOo 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Utility. Utility score of 75 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 59% on CT to 38% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 562ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.8

Positioning6.3

Utility7.5

Mechanics4.9

Opening Duels4.7

Win Impact3.9

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.01

first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00

Reaction time575ms−27ms

first ⅓ avg 602ms → last ⅓ avg 575ms

Headshot accuracy23.1%+4.0%

first ⅓ avg 19.1% → last ⅓ avg 23.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — nuke 13–4

13–2Biggest win — dust2

4Longest win streak

W2Current streak

10–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

12Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 80% over 10anubisWeakest map · 13% over 15

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	D	19	6–13	32%	-0.00
inferno	B	17	9–8	53%	0.01
nuke	B	16	8–8	50%	-0.02
anubis	D	15	2–13	13%	-0.03
cache	S	10	8–2	80%	0.01
ancient	C	10	4–6	40%	0.01
mirage	A	10	6–4	60%	0.01
overpass	—	3	1–2	33%	-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (13% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

741Matches

53%Win rate

1.06Avg K/D

74.7ADR

42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win

25%1v2 clutch win

8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Inferno	76	64%	1.00	14.7
Dust2	47	49%	1.04	15.5
Anubis	44	48%	0.93	13.6
Mirage	43	44%	0.95	14.4
Ancient	33	36%	0.94	14.4
Nuke	26	50%	1.08	16.3
Cache	23	61%	1.11	16.2
Overpass	10	60%	1.33	16.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.5%Headshot accuracy

31.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

33.5%Spray accuracy

72.0%Counter-strafing

9.4°Preaim

562msReaction time

38.5%T opening success

59.0%CT opening success

0.73Enemies flashed / flash

11.8%Flash assists

12.60HE damage / grenade

13.29Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 38.4636% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

13% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
cache	13–11	0.07	19%	27 Aug →
ancient	13–9	0.06	19%	27 Aug →
dust2	12–16	0.02	31%	27 Aug →
inferno	13–3	0.09	29%	24 Aug →
ancient	13–5	0.02	27%	24 Aug →
cache	11–13	0.05	33%	24 Aug →
nuke	13–5	-0.05	21%	24 Aug →
dust2	5–13	-0.03	26%	23 Aug →
ancient	9–13	0.05	26%	22 Aug →
dust2	8–13	0.09	20%	22 Aug →
nuke	2–13	-0.06	28%	21 Aug →
dust2	5–13	-0.04	36%	21 Aug →
inferno	5–13	-0.00	22%	21 Aug →
inferno	8–3	0.00	14%	20 Aug →
cache	13–11	-0.03	21%	20 Aug →
dust2	13–2	0.02	26%	20 Aug →
ancient	10–13	-0.00	24%	20 Aug →
dust2	13–2	-0.02	7%	19 Aug →
inferno	11–13	0.03	20%	19 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.01	18%	14 Aug →
nuke	4–13	-0.01	33%	14 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.03	12%	14 Aug →
nuke	13–11	-0.06	35%	14 Aug →
ancient	13–10	-0.01	27%	14 Aug →
anubis	10–13	-0.01	15%	14 Aug →
anubis	10–13	-0.03	28%	14 Aug →
nuke	13–3	0.07	14%	14 Aug →
inferno	11–13	-0.01	31%	13 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.07	25%	13 Aug →
nuke	13–11	-0.03	9%	12 Aug →
dust2	0–13	-0.04	20%	12 Aug →
dust2	1–6	-0.05	30%	7 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.01	17%	5 Aug →
nuke	4–13	-0.04	19%	3 Aug →
nuke	13–5	-0.01	21%	3 Aug →
nuke	13–16	-0.08	10%	1 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.04	12%	30 Jul →
mirage	3–13	-0.02	29%	29 Jul →
inferno	14–16	0.03	18%	29 Jul →
nuke	14–16	-0.01	29%	19 Jul →
mirage	2–13	0.04	29%	19 Jul →
ancient	4–13	-0.04	22%	13 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.02	20%	11 Jul →
anubis	2–13	-0.10	5%	11 Jul →
anubis	11–13	-0.04	14%	9 Jul →
dust2	10–13	0.03	22%	7 Jul →
cache	16–13	0.01	21%	7 Jul →
inferno	13–9	0.05	16%	7 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.12	35%	5 Jul →
anubis	9–13	-0.01	18%	5 Jul →
dust2	13–2	-0.04	16%	5 Jul →
overpass	8–13	-0.04	8%	3 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.03	13%	1 Jul →
anubis	7–13	-0.01	18%	1 Jul →
anubis	9–13	0.03	12%	30 Jun →
cache	13–11	0.04	19%	29 Jun →
inferno	7–13	-0.07	7%	29 Jun →
dust2	5–13	-0.04	12%	29 Jun →
inferno	16–13	0.04	22%	28 Jun →
anubis	5–13	-0.05	10%	28 Jun →
inferno	13–8	-0.01	19%	28 Jun →
nuke	13–4	0.05	19%	28 Jun →
inferno	13–7	0.06	20%	28 Jun →
ancient	13–4	0.10	13%	28 Jun →
dust2	6–13	0.00	16%	27 Jun →
inferno	7–13	0.06	20%	27 Jun →
nuke	13–4	0.15	17%	25 Jun →
cache	13–5	-0.00	12%	24 Jun →
inferno	16–13	-0.00	21%	24 Jun →
nuke	12–16	0.00	17%	24 Jun →
anubis	13–10	-0.00	9%	24 Jun →
cache	13–9	-0.03	5%	23 Jun →
inferno	16–13	-0.03	21%	22 Jun →
overpass	13–9	0.03	8%	22 Jun →
anubis	9–13	-0.02	19%	22 Jun →
anubis	16–13	-0.02	21%	21 Jun →
nuke	13–10	0.01	30%	21 Jun →
cache	7–13	0.03	11%	21 Jun →
inferno	11–13	-0.01	13%	21 Jun →
mirage	8–13	0.02	17%	18 Jun →
anubis	9–13	-0.09	6%	18 Jun →
mirage	13–11	0.02	19%	17 Jun →
ancient	3–13	0.00	20%	16 Jun →
ancient	4–13	-0.02	15%	16 Jun →
anubis	4–13	-0.05	10%	16 Jun →
dust2	25–22	0.09	25%	15 Jun →
cache	13–9	-0.02	18%	15 Jun →
nuke	2–9	-0.18	13%	15 Jun →
anubis	6–13	-0.04	32%	15 Jun →
ancient	7–13	-0.03	21%	14 Jun →
mirage	16–13	-0.04	23%	13 Jun →
cache	13–11	0.02	15%	13 Jun →
dust2	13–11	0.07	28%	13 Jun →
nuke	6–13	-0.07	13%	13 Jun →
inferno	9–13	-0.04	32%	13 Jun →
mirage	0–13	-0.06	50%	11 Jun →
overpass	7–13	-0.04	10%	11 Jun →
dust2	11–13	-0.01	16%	10 Jun →
anubis	10–13	0.03	32%	10 Jun →
inferno	13–11	0.06	30%	9 Jun →