YELL AT MY MEAT — CS2 Stats

76561198105209626[U:1:144943898]✓ No bans

72Tracked matches34%Win rate2025Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.2 DevelopingAggressive Rifler
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Performance scores

Aim74
Positioning42
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD35352Last 7249%Win rateLLTWLLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.06 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.4
Aggression6.6
Utility5.4
Positioning4.2
Opening Duels2.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 32 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 53% on CT to 29% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 601ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.4
Positioning4.2
Utility5.4
Mechanics7.0
Opening Duels2.9
Win Impact0.0

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.05
first ⅓ avg 0.06 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time591ms−22ms
first ⅓ avg 613ms → last ⅓ avg 591ms
Headshot accuracy17.4%−0.1%
first ⅓ avg 17.5% → last ⅓ avg 17.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 72 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — mirage 11–13
130Biggest win — office
8Longest win streak
L2Current streak
34In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 64% over 14nukeWeakest map · 20% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA159660%0.05
ancientA149564%0.05
infernoB126650%0.03
nukeD102820%0.04
anubisD93633%0.03
dust2D62433%-0.05
overpass21150%0.02
office220100%0.09
cache1010%-0.06
train110100%0.09

Across the last 72 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.1%Headshot accuracy
37.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.3%Spray accuracy
81.5%Counter-strafing
9.3°Preaim
601msReaction time
29.1%T opening success
53.2%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
10.1%Flash assists
12.99HE damage / grenade
7.90Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 29.051% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient14–16-0.0213%2 Aug
anubis2–13-0.0816%2 Aug
cache15–15-0.0620%2 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0018%20 Feb
inferno14–160.0817%16 Feb
dust23–13-0.1036%16 Feb
dust26–13-0.0721%16 Feb
dust210–13-0.0425%16 Feb
inferno13–3-0.0121%16 Feb
dust216–13-0.0213%12 Feb
mirage13–20.1322%12 Feb
nuke1–90.0522%31 Jan
mirage10–13-0.0510%28 Jan
anubis8–130.094%28 Jan
nuke4–13-0.0316%28 Jan
ancient9–130.0718%28 Jan
nuke5–130.0021%26 Jan
mirage13–90.0512%26 Jan
inferno10–13-0.019%26 Jan
dust22–13-0.0510%26 Jan
overpass13–50.0714%26 Jan
nuke9–130.0418%22 Jan
anubis13–40.0720%22 Jan
overpass7–13-0.0220%28 Jul
inferno6–130.048%28 Jul
dust213–8-0.0225%27 Jul
ancient13–100.1119%27 Jul
mirage7–13-0.028%24 Jul
ancient13–10.0518%24 Jul
anubis10–130.0225%2 Jul
mirage13–60.0912%2 Jul
nuke8–130.0622%2 Jul
ancient13–60.0121%1 Jul
ancient13–40.0821%26 Jun
ancient13–30.014%18 Jun
office13–50.0727%14 Jun
nuke13–70.0820%14 Jun
mirage13–60.0524%14 Jun
ancient13–70.0626%12 Jun
mirage16–130.0716%11 Jun
nuke9–130.0612%11 Jun
inferno5–130.0118%11 Jun
office13–00.1120%21 May
inferno2–130.0130%25 Apr
ancient13–90.0519%15 Apr
mirage2–13-0.1011%10 Apr
mirage15–150.0827%7 Apr
inferno16–130.1115%7 Apr
anubis13–110.049%5 Apr
inferno13–60.0124%5 Apr
nuke13–100.1526%5 Apr
anubis2–130.0224%5 Apr
mirage13–80.0824%5 Apr
nuke10–130.0120%26 Mar
nuke6–13-0.0316%22 Mar
ancient13–60.1420%22 Mar
anubis7–130.0217%19 Mar
ancient8–13-0.0111%19 Mar
mirage11–130.169%19 Mar
anubis13–80.0614%15 Mar
mirage13–100.1014%12 Mar
ancient16–140.0519%12 Mar
inferno13–100.0316%12 Mar
ancient11–130.029%12 Mar
mirage13–70.1019%9 Mar
anubis6–130.0513%9 Mar
inferno9–130.0326%9 Mar
inferno13–60.0615%2 Mar
mirage3–130.0216%12 Feb
inferno9–70.0423%12 Feb
ancient8–130.1118%12 Feb
train13–70.0919%12 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →