Sandy Cumquats

Sandy Cumquats — CS2 Stats

76561198099457299[U:1:139191571]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

290Tracked matches55%Win rate2026Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.2 Developing
Premier CS Rating10,631Blue band · top ~51.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#24429 of 34088 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

10,631Peak Premier on CSDB
1Days observed since 2026-08-29

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 10,631
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 4,369 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-29
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-08-29

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSandy CumquatsPREMIER10,631 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim44
Positioning46
Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY43507Last 10043%Win rateLWWLLWWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim4.4
Aggression5.3
Utility5.5
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels1.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 44% on CT to 27% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 625ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 67% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.4
Positioning4.6
Utility5.5
Mechanics3.7
Opening Duels1.8
Win Impact6.7

Composite 4.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time629ms+29ms
first ⅓ avg 600ms → last ⅓ avg 629ms
Headshot accuracy17.7%+4.2%
first ⅓ avg 13.6% → last ⅓ avg 17.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.09Best rating — inferno 6–13
131Biggest win — dust2
4Longest win streak
45In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
2Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 56% over 9anubisWeakest map · 23% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C2381535%-0.02
mirageC167944%-0.02
infernoB157847%0.00
ancientB136746%-0.02
anubisD1331023%-0.02
cacheA95456%-0.03
nuke440100%-0.05
vertigo3030%-0.01
boulder220100%-0.03
overpass1010%-0.04
fachwerk110100%0.09

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (23% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.9%Headshot accuracy
32.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
30.4%Spray accuracy
66.6%Counter-strafing
10.6°Preaim
625msReaction time
26.8%T opening success
44.4%CT opening success
0.64Enemies flashed / flash
7.2%Flash assists
8.26HE damage / grenade
6.63Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 26.8255% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

23% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient8–13-0.0015%29 Aug
nuke13–4-0.0433%29 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0119%29 Aug
dust28–13-0.0227%28 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0314%28 Aug
inferno16–140.0223%27 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0326%27 Aug
cache13–60.0130%27 Aug
inferno10–130.0311%26 Aug
dust213–90.0319%26 Aug
cache13–9-0.0521%26 Aug
mirage13–10-0.039%24 Aug
dust22–13-0.0910%24 Aug
anubis11–130.0320%24 Aug
dust213–10.029%21 Aug
ancient12–12-0.0211%21 Aug
dust26–130.0012%16 Aug
dust213–10.0319%16 Aug
cache4–13-0.0626%16 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0114%16 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0323%16 Aug
cache13–30.029%16 Aug
inferno13–50.0716%16 Aug
boulder13–10-0.0517%15 Aug
ancient13–2-0.0329%15 Aug
mirage5–130.0815%10 Aug
dust213–8-0.0129%10 Aug
inferno6–130.0919%9 Aug
mirage13–10-0.012%9 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0713%9 Aug
cache10–13-0.0415%6 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0018%4 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0213%4 Aug
dust211–13-0.0521%2 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0422%2 Aug
dust23–13-0.0824%2 Aug
inferno13–80.0214%2 Aug
dust29–13-0.086%2 Aug
dust213–20.0513%1 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0513%1 Aug
anubis13–9-0.057%1 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0120%30 Jul
ancient4–4-0.0214%30 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0511%30 Jul
anubis13–90.0510%29 Jul
vertigo6–13-0.0110%29 Jul
inferno12–120.0612%29 Jul
dust28–13-0.0322%29 Jul
ancient13–4-0.017%29 Jul
vertigo12–12-0.0213%29 Jul
anubis7–13-0.057%28 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0410%28 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0415%27 Jul
nuke13–10-0.0814%27 Jul
dust212–12-0.0115%27 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0517%26 Jul
dust213–6-0.0213%26 Jul
dust23–13-0.0410%26 Jul
dust213–60.0412%26 Jul
anubis2–13-0.0714%26 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0113%26 Jul
mirage8–130.0021%26 Jul
dust28–13-0.0413%25 Jul
cache13–8-0.0113%25 Jul
inferno13–80.0416%25 Jul
anubis9–13-0.034%24 Jul
vertigo8–130.0011%24 Jul
dust213–20.025%23 Jul
anubis13–20.040%23 Jul
ancient4–13-0.0216%22 Jul
anubis2–13-0.0410%22 Jul
anubis3–130.016%22 Jul
cache13–70.0220%21 Jul
inferno1–13-0.1223%21 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0320%21 Jul
anubis4–13-0.065%21 Jul
inferno13–3-0.0236%20 Jul
anubis12–12-0.0216%20 Jul
inferno13–6-0.0316%19 Jul
mirage12–3-0.0615%19 Jul
dust20–4-0.030%19 Jul
dust27–13-0.0713%19 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0419%19 Jul
nuke16–13-0.029%19 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0424%18 Jul
cache4–13-0.0819%18 Jul
mirage13–10-0.047%18 Jul
dust212–120.0212%18 Jul
cache9–13-0.1114%18 Jul
mirage2–13-0.097%18 Jul
dust211–13-0.0411%17 Jul
mirage4–90.047%17 Jul
nuke13–11-0.0711%16 Jul
dust212–120.0319%16 Jul
boulder13–110.0018%15 Jul
overpass5–13-0.0411%15 Jul
inferno13–50.0416%15 Jul
ancient13–30.089%14 Jul
fachwerk13–70.0921%14 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0217%13 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →