Jared Alexander — CS2 Stats

76561198098005121[U:1:137739393]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,226Tracked matches53%Win rate2021Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.5 SolidAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating24,891Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3.1% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#2651 of 15741 tracked

WingmanSilver Elite Master

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim80

Positioning62

Utility22

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52–45–3Last 10052%Win rateLLWLLLWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.05 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.0

Aggression9.6

Utility2.2

Positioning6.2

Opening Duels4.3

Clutch3.4

Excellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like device 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 59% on CT to 35% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 609ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0

Positioning6.2

Utility2.2

Mechanics8.8

Opening Duels4.3

Win Impact6.1

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.03

first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time613ms+10ms

first ⅓ avg 603ms → last ⅓ avg 613ms

Headshot accuracy25.0%−1.2%

first ⅓ avg 26.2% → last ⅓ avg 25.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.25Best rating — nuke 13–8

13–1Biggest win — mirage

8Longest win streak

L2Current streak

4–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

2Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 69% over 16nukeWeakest map · 30% over 10

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	B	52	28–24	54%	0.03
ancient	S	16	11–5	69%	0.01
office	B	13	7–6	54%	0.06
nuke	D	10	3–7	30%	0.04
dust2	C	5	2–3	40%	0.04
inferno	—	2	0–2	0%	0.01
train	—	1	0–1	0%	0.04
overpass	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,159Matches

51%Win rate

1.01Avg K/D

75.5ADR

52%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win

18%1v2 clutch win

11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	464	52%	1.00	15.1
Ancient	254	56%	1.08	15.9
Inferno	135	52%	0.96	14.0
Anubis	110	45%	0.99	15.5
Dust2	93	54%	1.05	15.2
Nuke	45	38%	0.90	13.1
Overpass	24	46%	1.12	16.2
Vertigo	21	52%	0.90	13.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.2%Headshot accuracy

34.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

36.9%Spray accuracy

89.8%Counter-strafing

10.4°Preaim

609msReaction time

35.3%T opening success

59.2%CT opening success

0.53Enemies flashed / flash

1.4%Flash assists

9.48HE damage / grenade

5.27Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 35.2977% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
inferno	4–13	0.04	29%	5 Jul →
ancient	4–13	-0.02	20%	5 Jul →
mirage	13–5	-0.00	16%	5 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.10	26%	2 Jul →
mirage	11–13	0.02	22%	5 Mar →
mirage	7–13	-0.02	19%	5 Mar →
mirage	13–9	-0.02	19%	4 Mar →
mirage	13–10	-0.00	25%	24 Feb →
nuke	1–13	-0.02	27%	16 Feb →
nuke	13–4	-0.01	27%	14 Feb →
mirage	6–13	0.01	38%	11 Feb →
mirage	5–13	-0.03	18%	10 Oct →
ancient	13–8	0.04	14%	8 Oct →
dust2	13–10	0.09	27%	8 Oct →
mirage	13–11	-0.01	26%	8 Oct →
mirage	9–13	0.03	23%	3 Oct →
ancient	11–13	0.09	21%	3 Oct →
dust2	5–13	-0.02	23%	2 Oct →
mirage	13–8	0.07	25%	2 Oct →
train	2–13	0.04	33%	1 Oct →
ancient	13–2	0.04	24%	1 Oct →
ancient	13–9	0.03	33%	1 Oct →
mirage	2–13	0.00	36%	1 Oct →
ancient	16–14	-0.04	22%	30 Sept →
mirage	13–9	0.02	28%	29 Sept →
mirage	13–10	0.00	29%	28 Sept →
overpass	13–7	-0.01	18%	28 Sept →
mirage	13–9	0.03	21%	25 Sept →
nuke	13–8	0.25	26%	19 Sept →
mirage	10–13	-0.00	20%	17 Sept →
mirage	11–13	0.01	31%	17 Sept →
mirage	4–13	-0.08	34%	17 Sept →
ancient	13–3	0.05	27%	5 Sept →
ancient	9–12	-0.05	18%	4 Sept →
nuke	10–13	-0.04	23%	31 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.09	31%	30 Aug →
mirage	13–2	0.03	15%	30 Aug →
office	13–10	-0.02	17%	30 Aug →
ancient	13–10	-0.02	26%	27 Aug →
nuke	11–13	0.13	28%	22 Aug →
office	5–13	0.06	24%	22 Aug →
ancient	13–9	-0.01	24%	22 Aug →
mirage	3–13	-0.03	41%	20 Aug →
office	0–3	-0.01	50%	20 Aug →
nuke	10–13	0.07	25%	20 Aug →
ancient	7–13	-0.01	30%	20 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.03	33%	18 Aug →
office	13–3	0.16	31%	18 Aug →
mirage	13–8	-0.01	22%	18 Aug →
mirage	13–2	0.14	19%	17 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.03	25%	17 Aug →
ancient	13–5	0.03	12%	14 Aug →
office	13–7	0.06	37%	13 Aug →
mirage	13–4	0.16	26%	13 Aug →
mirage	4–13	-0.06	32%	13 Aug →
ancient	13–2	0.05	22%	13 Aug →
mirage	5–13	-0.01	46%	12 Aug →
nuke	6–13	-0.02	20%	12 Aug →
office	13–5	0.05	25%	12 Aug →
office	12–12	0.07	35%	11 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.03	41%	11 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.01	35%	11 Aug →
office	13–9	0.13	31%	10 Aug →
office	4–13	0.01	25%	10 Aug →
ancient	13–10	-0.04	31%	10 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.12	32%	10 Aug →
office	4–13	0.03	35%	10 Aug →
office	6–2	0.10	24%	10 Aug →
office	12–12	0.01	32%	8 Aug →
office	13–4	0.17	37%	8 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.10	22%	7 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.03	20%	7 Aug →
mirage	13–8	-0.02	30%	7 Aug →
nuke	13–10	-0.00	27%	6 Aug →
inferno	11–13	-0.03	23%	5 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.05	29%	5 Aug →
mirage	9–13	0.09	21%	5 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.16	36%	5 Aug →
ancient	25–23	0.01	21%	5 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.02	24%	4 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.06	32%	3 Aug →
mirage	13–10	-0.02	34%	3 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.10	28%	3 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.01	33%	3 Aug →
mirage	8–13	0.05	28%	3 Aug →
ancient	10–13	-0.03	16%	3 Aug →
mirage	5–13	0.04	35%	3 Aug →
mirage	13–4	0.06	19%	2 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.04	28%	2 Aug →
mirage	13–4	0.07	16%	2 Aug →
mirage	10–13	0.14	32%	2 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.07	31%	2 Aug →
mirage	13–1	0.06	33%	2 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.05	24%	2 Aug →
nuke	3–13	0.02	21%	2 Aug →
dust2	13–7	-0.02	16%	2 Aug →
dust2	12–12	0.19	28%	2 Aug →
nuke	11–13	0.01	32%	31 Jul →
dust2	10–13	-0.03	19%	30 Jul →
mirage	11–13	0.02	16%	30 Jul →