fiRenzy -,- — CS2 Stats

76561198097000186[U:1:136734458]✓ No bans

715Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating24,092Top 25% of 29,473 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#8706 of 52943 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,563 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGfiRenzy -,-FACEITLevel 8 · 1,563 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER24,092 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim74
Positioning49
Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54442Last 10054%Win rateLWWTWWLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.4
Aggression4.7
Utility5.5
Positioning4.9
Opening Duels2.3
Clutch6.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 58% on CT to 21% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 556ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.4
Positioning4.9
Utility5.5
Mechanics5.7
Opening Duels3.4
Win Impact7.4

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time560ms−46ms
first ⅓ avg 606ms → last ⅓ avg 560ms
Headshot accuracy17.6%−1.8%
first ⅓ avg 19.4% → last ⅓ avg 17.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — inferno 13–4
131Biggest win — cache
6Longest win streak
128In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 65% over 31mirageWeakest map · 38% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2S31201165%-0.01
mirageC1661038%-0.01
infernoA148657%-0.01
ancientA117464%-0.01
nukeC104640%0.01
cacheA95456%0.00
anubisC73443%-0.02
overpass21150%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

146Matches
49%Win rate
1.23Avg K/D
85.7ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

52%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust21443%0.9816.1
Mirage1354%1.1216.5
Ancient475%1.3420.8
Nuke425%0.9318.3
Anubis30%0.9819.3
Inferno10%1.1120.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.9%Headshot accuracy
35.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.5%Spray accuracy
75.6%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
556msReaction time
20.8%T opening success
57.5%CT opening success
0.62Enemies flashed / flash
8.9%Flash assists
11.51HE damage / grenade
5.13Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 20.7681% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis11–130.0129%20 Aug
dust213–9-0.0424%20 Aug
inferno16–13-0.0427%20 Aug
cache15–15-0.0316%18 Aug
dust213–100.0513%17 Aug
dust213–30.0317%17 Aug
dust211–13-0.0127%14 Aug
ancient16–140.0128%14 Aug
dust28–13-0.0614%14 Aug
anubis2–13-0.109%5 Aug
nuke2–13-0.0810%5 Aug
cache2–13-0.0527%2 Aug
cache16–14-0.0319%29 Jul
dust22–13-0.0623%28 Jul
mirage13–80.0116%28 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0215%22 Jul
dust26–13-0.0115%21 Jul
cache13–80.0313%19 Jul
nuke16–120.0913%19 Jul
dust213–20.1020%19 Jul
cache13–7-0.0114%19 Jul
inferno13–11-0.0512%18 Jul
inferno13–50.0221%18 Jul
anubis15–15-0.0213%16 Jul
cache13–80.0712%16 Jul
mirage13–110.0817%16 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0218%15 Jul
cache11–13-0.0215%14 Jul
dust213–60.0917%14 Jul
cache11–130.0218%10 Jul
inferno13–70.0316%9 Jul
dust213–70.0122%4 Jul
nuke9–130.0514%28 Jun
nuke9–130.0216%27 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0510%27 Jun
dust29–130.0427%27 Jun
dust213–11-0.0319%26 Jun
nuke13–30.1116%25 Jun
inferno10–6-0.0114%25 Jun
dust213–10-0.0528%24 Jun
dust27–13-0.0219%24 Jun
dust213–8-0.0414%23 Jun
ancient13–110.0126%22 Jun
ancient9–13-0.0515%21 Jun
dust20–13-0.1064%21 Jun
ancient10–13-0.019%19 Jun
dust213–80.0118%19 Jun
inferno14–160.0115%18 Jun
overpass13–80.0617%16 Jun
dust213–80.0528%15 Jun
inferno13–40.1417%14 Jun
dust213–5-0.0632%14 Jun
nuke13–70.0217%12 Jun
inferno16–14-0.0311%12 Jun
dust212–160.0220%10 Jun
dust213–9-0.0114%10 Jun
ancient13–100.0921%9 Jun
mirage13–6-0.0030%9 Jun
anubis13–10-0.0129%8 Jun
inferno10–130.0013%8 Jun
mirage7–130.0018%7 Jun
nuke7–130.0223%7 Jun
ancient13–7-0.049%7 Jun
inferno9–13-0.0320%7 Jun
dust25–13-0.0420%7 Jun
mirage13–11-0.0514%4 Jun
dust212–16-0.0121%4 Jun
ancient13–10-0.0215%4 Jun
anubis11–130.0113%4 Jun
inferno2–13-0.1221%4 Jun
anubis13–40.0327%2 Jun
inferno13–11-0.0322%2 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0018%2 Jun
dust213–60.0630%2 Jun
mirage13–6-0.019%1 Jun
ancient10–13-0.0120%23 May
mirage2–13-0.0813%23 May
ancient13–4-0.0110%23 May
dust213–7-0.0317%18 May
mirage11–13-0.0310%13 May
dust26–13-0.0914%12 May
cache13–10.0223%10 May
mirage13–110.1024%10 May
dust213–11-0.0226%1 May
nuke3–13-0.0532%24 Mar
nuke5–13-0.0726%24 Mar
nuke13–6-0.0420%23 Mar
ancient7–13-0.0821%18 Mar
mirage1–13-0.0430%18 Mar
dust213–90.0016%17 Mar
mirage8–130.0225%17 Mar
inferno2–5-0.0113%17 Mar
dust216–120.0012%17 Mar
overpass7–13-0.0231%2 Mar
anubis13–11-0.0414%1 Mar
dust213–100.0126%1 Mar
inferno10–13-0.0519%1 Mar
dust213–90.0316%1 Mar
ancient13–70.0316%28 Feb
mirage8–13-0.0511%26 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →