G4ME

G4ME — CS2 Stats

US76561198095652129[U:1:135386401]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,855Tracked matches59%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.3 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating21,255Top 50% of 29,473 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#14667 of 45925 tracked
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

21,255Peak Premier on CSDB
1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 21,255
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 3,745 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGG4MEFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER21,255 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim68
Positioning54
Utility66

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46522Last 10046%Win rateWWLLLWLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.8
Aggression5.6
Utility6.6
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels2.3
Clutch3.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 48% on CT to 31% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 603ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.8
Positioning5.4
Utility6.6
Mechanics7.3
Opening Duels2.3
Win Impact7.9

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time611ms−5ms
first ⅓ avg 616ms → last ⅓ avg 611ms
Headshot accuracy17.3%+1.1%
first ⅓ avg 16.2% → last ⅓ avg 17.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.11Best rating — mirage 13–1
131Biggest win — mirage
6Longest win streak
W2Current streak
119In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 78% over 9ancientWeakest map · 33% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoC2081240%0.01
mirageB2091145%-0.01
dust2C1771041%-0.00
ancientD1551033%-0.00
nukeS97278%0.01
anubisA95456%-0.00
cacheA85363%-0.03
overpass2020%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

85Matches
60%Win rate
1.09Avg K/D
86.1ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust2850%0.9414.0
Inferno633%0.9715.3
Anubis650%0.8212.0
Nuke560%1.0818.6
Mirage425%1.0418.0
Cache4100%1.3121.5
Train10%1.1219.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.3%Headshot accuracy
34.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.2%Spray accuracy
83.0%Counter-strafing
9.9°Preaim
603msReaction time
30.5%T opening success
47.9%CT opening success
0.61Enemies flashed / flash
8.2%Flash assists
12.02HE damage / grenade
9.15Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.5048% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–100.0326%18 Aug
cache13–100.0214%17 Aug
inferno8–130.0716%17 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0515%17 Aug
ancient8–130.059%17 Aug
ancient16–12-0.0011%12 Aug
inferno11–130.0520%11 Aug
inferno13–100.0320%11 Aug
ancient10–130.019%11 Aug
dust27–3-0.0518%11 Aug
dust211–13-0.0218%10 Aug
dust213–70.0527%10 Aug
mirage13–10.1116%10 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0112%10 Aug
nuke13–90.0611%10 Aug
dust210–130.0418%10 Aug
mirage16–140.0217%10 Aug
ancient15–15-0.0110%10 Aug
nuke13–90.0113%9 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0124%9 Aug
mirage13–50.0813%9 Aug
cache13–110.0217%9 Aug
cache13–3-0.0517%7 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0214%7 Aug
ancient8–130.0221%7 Aug
nuke13–80.0420%7 Aug
dust213–16-0.0219%5 Aug
inferno4–13-0.0235%5 Aug
nuke13–90.0725%4 Aug
cache4–13-0.0921%4 Aug
inferno13–110.0819%4 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0620%4 Aug
inferno13–110.026%3 Aug
dust27–13-0.0421%27 Jul
cache2–13-0.144%27 Jul
anubis13–20.0328%27 Jul
anubis13–3-0.0121%27 Jul
inferno13–30.1022%27 Jul
mirage6–130.0315%27 Jul
anubis5–13-0.007%22 Jul
cache22–200.0319%17 Jul
dust25–130.026%5 Jul
cache6–13-0.0422%9 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0413%9 Jun
dust211–13-0.0415%9 Jun
ancient10–130.0113%2 Jun
mirage5–13-0.0330%2 Jun
dust211–13-0.0613%1 Jun
inferno2–13-0.0412%1 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0836%31 May
mirage3–13-0.0926%31 May
dust211–130.0126%26 May
nuke13–7-0.0916%26 May
inferno13–160.0027%25 May
dust213–90.0116%25 May
dust213–70.0229%18 May
anubis10–13-0.043%18 May
inferno9–130.0413%18 May
inferno13–110.0619%12 May
dust215–150.0314%11 May
anubis10–130.0515%11 May
mirage0–13-0.136%11 May
mirage2–13-0.076%11 May
mirage13–8-0.0115%5 May
mirage13–60.0319%5 May
ancient4–13-0.0125%5 May
dust26–13-0.0614%5 May
inferno13–9-0.0614%4 May
ancient8–13-0.0511%4 May
nuke16–140.0416%4 May
dust213–100.0315%4 May
mirage7–130.0419%4 May
mirage13–90.0213%4 May
cache13–60.0123%29 Apr
overpass11–13-0.0329%14 Apr
inferno13–60.0717%14 Apr
mirage13–9-0.0911%13 Apr
mirage7–13-0.0613%13 Apr
nuke6–130.0119%13 Apr
inferno16–140.0110%7 Apr
inferno9–130.0318%6 Apr
mirage13–50.0816%6 Apr
dust213–11-0.0014%6 Apr
mirage11–130.0013%31 Mar
inferno10–13-0.0014%31 Mar
anubis5–13-0.0429%31 Mar
nuke14–160.0015%31 Mar
inferno3–13-0.048%31 Mar
anubis13–100.0417%31 Mar
inferno10–13-0.0219%31 Mar
inferno2–13-0.0911%30 Mar
ancient13–70.0715%30 Mar
mirage13–40.0021%30 Mar
mirage2–13-0.0714%30 Mar
ancient13–3-0.0321%30 Mar
nuke13–8-0.0019%30 Mar
dust213–80.0221%27 Mar
ancient10–13-0.0324%24 Mar
ancient13–8-0.0211%22 Mar
overpass9–13-0.016%16 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →