Twitch.tv/AdhemSwag

Twitch.tv/AdhemSwag — CS2 Stats

BR76561198095575587[U:1:135309859]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

6,011Tracked matches43%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.1 Developing
Premier CS Rating16,520Purple band · top ~22.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#23341 of 41878 tracked
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,181 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGTwitch.tv/AdhemSwagFACEITLevel 5 · 1,181 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER16,520 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim50
Positioning44
Utility41

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD46513Last 10046%Win rateTLLWLLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.0
Aggression4.2
Utility4.1
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels0.8
Clutch3.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 76% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 669ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.0
Positioning4.4
Utility4.1
Mechanics5.3
Opening Duels0.8
Win Impact2.6

Composite 4.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time674ms−16ms
first ⅓ avg 690ms → last ⅓ avg 674ms
Headshot accuracy22.7%+2.5%
first ⅓ avg 20.1% → last ⅓ avg 22.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.12Best rating — mirage 6–13
132Biggest win — ancient
4Longest win streak
1010In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 80% over 5nukeWeakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB28141450%-0.01
dust2A2012860%-0.01
infernoC167944%-0.02
cacheB115645%-0.01
anubisD102820%-0.05
nukeD61517%-0.05
ancientS54180%-0.02
vertigo1010%0.05
train110100%0.02
overpass1010%-0.05
poseidon1010%-0.10

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

6,273Matches
49%Win rate
0.89Avg K/D
74.6ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage167952%0.8814.7
Inferno89450%0.8914.3
Ancient39643%0.8815.1
Anubis30843%0.9015.3
Dust230847%0.8715.0
Vertigo15544%0.9014.4
Overpass13547%0.9315.1
Nuke12738%0.7813.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.8%Headshot accuracy
32.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.1%Spray accuracy
73.7%Counter-strafing
11.4°Preaim
669msReaction time
35.2%T opening success
31.4%CT opening success
0.53Enemies flashed / flash
6.1%Flash assists
5.00HE damage / grenade
4.34Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.1625% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage15–15-0.0117%17 Aug
nuke4–13-0.0423%15 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0332%7 Aug
dust213–8-0.0230%7 Aug
dust22–13-0.0333%7 Aug
cache4–13-0.0422%7 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0310%7 Aug
dust211–13-0.0223%6 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0025%5 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0619%3 Aug
mirage13–70.0122%28 Jul
mirage8–130.0425%28 Jul
dust213–30.1025%27 Jul
dust210–130.0721%27 Jul
mirage13–5-0.0223%26 Jul
dust27–13-0.0124%26 Jul
cache14–16-0.0110%20 Jul
ancient5–13-0.089%18 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0315%18 Jul
dust213–11-0.0121%17 Jul
cache13–11-0.0310%17 Jul
cache13–50.0230%17 Jul
mirage13–5-0.0219%15 Jul
mirage6–130.0435%15 Jul
dust28–13-0.065%14 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0325%13 Jul
mirage15–15-0.0310%10 Jul
dust26–00.0367%10 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0220%9 Jul
cache13–90.0724%9 Jul
cache2–13-0.0530%9 Jul
cache11–130.0524%9 Jul
anubis2–13-0.0821%8 Jul
vertigo7–130.0533%7 Jul
cache13–90.0126%6 Jul
anubis13–8-0.0225%4 Jul
nuke13–10-0.0117%1 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0321%1 Jul
mirage17–19-0.0418%29 Jun
mirage13–7-0.0445%28 Jun
nuke2–13-0.1010%24 Jun
mirage3–130.0421%24 Jun
ancient13–20.0224%24 Jun
mirage6–130.1216%24 Jun
dust213–100.0328%23 Jun
anubis11–13-0.0113%23 Jun
inferno8–13-0.0318%23 Jun
dust216–14-0.0231%18 Jun
dust213–5-0.086%17 Jun
dust216–14-0.0410%17 Jun
train13–20.0210%17 Jun
nuke7–13-0.0514%14 Jun
inferno6–13-0.0730%14 Jun
inferno11–13-0.0124%14 Jun
overpass11–13-0.0512%11 Jun
inferno13–7-0.0619%9 Jun
dust213–30.0015%3 Jun
mirage12–10.0420%3 Jun
anubis11–13-0.0622%1 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0223%30 May
dust213–16-0.0022%29 May
inferno20–22-0.0214%28 May
anubis8–13-0.0817%28 May
inferno13–9-0.0324%24 May
dust28–13-0.0329%24 May
anubis5–13-0.0824%22 May
mirage16–140.0119%19 May
cache22–18-0.0212%13 May
anubis0–5-0.060%12 May
mirage13–9-0.0515%9 May
mirage3–13-0.0723%8 May
mirage13–9-0.0522%8 May
inferno13–90.0316%7 May
nuke4–13-0.087%7 May
dust22–13-0.1244%7 May
inferno13–70.0128%7 May
ancient13–70.0323%3 May
cache12–12-0.0724%28 Apr
ancient13–9-0.0529%28 Apr
mirage13–90.1021%27 Apr
inferno13–11-0.0520%25 Apr
inferno10–13-0.0032%24 Apr
mirage13–10-0.0332%22 Apr
inferno13–2-0.0111%20 Apr
poseidon6–9-0.1018%18 Apr
mirage8–13-0.0420%18 Apr
mirage13–10-0.0417%18 Apr
mirage9–13-0.0517%9 Apr
mirage7–13-0.0414%8 Apr
dust213–80.0830%7 Apr
anubis13–7-0.0424%7 Apr
dust216–140.0721%5 Apr
cache8–13-0.0314%3 Apr
mirage4–130.0118%3 Apr
dust216–14-0.0523%2 Apr
ancient13–11-0.0422%1 Apr
anubis12–160.0013%1 Apr
anubis11–13-0.0322%31 Mar
inferno13–100.0013%30 Mar
inferno4–13-0.0420%30 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →