YONT

YONT — CS2 Stats

76561198095523819[U:1:135258091]Steam profile ↗

344Tracked matches48%Win rate2026Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.7 SolidHybrid Rifler
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGYONTFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim71
Positioning50
Utility46

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51472Last 10051%Win rateLLLWWLWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.1
Aggression5.7
Utility4.6
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels2.4
Clutch5.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 53% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 579ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.1
Positioning5.0
Utility4.6
Mechanics7.6
Opening Duels2.8
Win Impact4.4

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time574ms−41ms
first ⅓ avg 615ms → last ⅓ avg 574ms
Headshot accuracy10.6%−4.3%
first ⅓ avg 14.9% → last ⅓ avg 10.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.19Best rating — ancient 13–1
131Biggest win — inferno
8Longest win streak
L3Current streak
37In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 88% over 8nukeWeakest map · 36% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB28141450%0.00
dust2B21101148%-0.00
nukeC114736%-0.02
ancientB105550%0.03
anubisS87188%0.03
cacheC83538%0.01
infernoS65183%0.04
office41325%0.07
train21150%0.04
overpass21150%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

136Matches
47%Win rate
0.98Avg K/D
76.2ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

48%1v1 clutch win
26%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage4048%0.9513.4
Dust22741%0.8613.0
Anubis2075%1.2314.6
Nuke1429%0.8815.1
Ancient1233%1.1416.1
Cache1030%0.8611.8
Inferno967%1.1015.6
Overpass450%0.8810.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

11.0%Headshot accuracy
38.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.1%Spray accuracy
84.3%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
579msReaction time
26.1%T opening success
52.8%CT opening success
0.63Enemies flashed / flash
8.1%Flash assists
11.08HE damage / grenade
5.48Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 10.9914% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 26.1189% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust28–13-0.0813%20 Jul
dust26–13-0.093%19 Jul
ancient6–130.009%19 Jul
anubis11–00.085%19 Jul
mirage13–100.0815%19 Jul
mirage11–130.0512%19 Jul
anubis13–5-0.0018%19 Jul
inferno13–10.0611%18 Jul
cache3–13-0.0220%18 Jul
ancient13–10.1919%18 Jul
cache7–13-0.128%15 Jul
mirage2–13-0.074%15 Jul
dust213–9-0.018%14 Jul
office12–120.0918%10 Jul
mirage5–13-0.024%9 Jul
nuke13–90.0422%9 Jul
office4–130.0512%8 Jul
office13–40.1510%8 Jul
office1–6-0.020%8 Jul
ancient13–70.0710%8 Jul
dust213–80.108%5 Jul
dust216–120.0214%5 Jul
inferno13–100.0216%5 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0216%4 Jul
cache2–13-0.134%3 Jul
dust25–13-0.044%3 Jul
ancient13–70.058%3 Jul
mirage11–13-0.016%3 Jul
nuke10–13-0.088%3 Jul
mirage13–30.0612%3 Jul
cache13–20.0416%2 Jul
cache8–130.1411%2 Jul
dust213–60.038%30 Jun
ancient7–130.0012%30 Jun
cache13–60.1315%29 Jun
nuke11–13-0.017%29 Jun
mirage8–130.0510%28 Jun
nuke7–130.0213%28 Jun
inferno13–30.0211%28 Jun
anubis13–100.058%27 Jun
inferno10–130.0424%26 Jun
cache7–13-0.0027%24 Jun
mirage12–120.0212%24 Jun
mirage13–30.0421%24 Jun
dust213–10-0.0120%22 Jun
mirage13–8-0.0011%22 Jun
dust26–13-0.1010%22 Jun
dust22–13-0.0515%21 Jun
dust213–30.1020%21 Jun
nuke11–13-0.0120%21 Jun
dust28–130.0813%21 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0819%21 Jun
dust29–130.0016%21 Jun
dust26–13-0.0728%21 Jun
dust213–3-0.0515%20 Jun
anubis13–110.0011%20 Jun
mirage14–16-0.007%20 Jun
dust213–60.0716%20 Jun
ancient10–130.0323%20 Jun
mirage13–10.0719%20 Jun
ancient8–13-0.0317%20 Jun
nuke3–13-0.0615%20 Jun
cache13–90.0522%20 Jun
mirage10–13-0.0311%19 Jun
nuke13–90.0511%18 Jun
mirage13–10-0.0615%18 Jun
dust211–13-0.0515%18 Jun
inferno16–120.0016%18 Jun
mirage9–13-0.0214%17 Jun
train13–40.1222%17 Jun
train7–13-0.038%17 Jun
dust219–22-0.0117%16 Jun
dust29–130.0927%16 Jun
nuke2–13-0.077%15 Jun
mirage10–13-0.0619%15 Jun
nuke13–90.0313%15 Jun
mirage13–10-0.0312%14 Jun
dust213–4-0.0416%14 Jun
mirage13–80.0723%14 Jun
mirage19–15-0.0316%14 Jun
mirage13–40.049%14 Jun
dust213–40.0212%14 Jun
mirage3–13-0.0517%13 Jun
ancient13–11-0.057%13 Jun
mirage13–50.0123%13 Jun
anubis9–130.0411%13 Jun
ancient13–4-0.0011%13 Jun
overpass3–130.0217%13 Jun
ancient10–130.0724%13 Jun
nuke3–13-0.0616%12 Jun
anubis13–90.0911%12 Jun
mirage4–13-0.0420%12 Jun
mirage13–50.0021%12 Jun
anubis13–100.0115%12 Jun
mirage13–70.0713%12 Jun
nuke13–11-0.0211%12 Jun
anubis13–9-0.047%12 Jun
inferno13–80.0712%12 Jun
mirage13–10-0.0113%12 Jun
overpass13–80.0114%11 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →