Absolute

Absolute — CS2 Stats

US76561198095190835[U:1:134925107]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

969Tracked matches46%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating3.0 Learning
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGAbsoluteFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim31
Positioning34
Utility31

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY36568Last 10036%Win rateWTLLWWLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim3.1
Aggression1.6
Utility3.1
Positioning3.4
Opening Duels0.1
Clutch1.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 66% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 42% on CT to 20% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 698ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 61% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim3.1
Positioning3.4
Utility3.1
Mechanics2.5
Opening Duels1.4
Win Impact3.8

Composite 3.0/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.04 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time691ms−6ms
first ⅓ avg 697ms → last ⅓ avg 691ms
Headshot accuracy11.9%−2.7%
first ⅓ avg 14.6% → last ⅓ avg 11.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.10Best rating — vertigo 13–3
131Biggest win — mirage
3Longest win streak
212In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 46% over 13overpassWeakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoD1651131%-0.04
nukeD1441029%-0.02
vertigoC146843%-0.01
mirageB136746%-0.01
ancientC125742%-0.00
anubisC73443%-0.00
cacheD72529%-0.04
dust2C73443%-0.04
overpassD61517%-0.01
train31233%-0.01
office1010%-0.10

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Overpass is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Overpass lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

13Matches
23%Win rate
0.64Avg K/D
60.7ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

25%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
1Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust230%0.376.0
Mirage333%1.029.3
Vertigo250%0.305.5
Inferno20%0.8312.5
Ancient250%0.5911.5
Overpass10%0.6813.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

12.3%Headshot accuracy
34.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.3%Spray accuracy
61.4%Counter-strafing
11.8°Preaim
698msReaction time
19.5%T opening success
41.5%CT opening success
0.32Enemies flashed / flash
3.4%Flash assists
3.60HE damage / grenade
13.02Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 12.3435% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3217 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 19.5033% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Overpass

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Overpass callouts & strategyOverpass grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–90.0310%28 Aug
inferno15–15-0.0110%19 Aug
nuke13–160.0111%15 Aug
overpass11–130.0110%6 Jul
vertigo13–10-0.1010%5 Jul
mirage13–10.0510%5 Jul
inferno11–13-0.057%4 Jul
ancient13–40.0213%3 Jul
cache3–13-0.109%3 Jul
mirage13–40.0313%3 Jul
vertigo6–13-0.0812%29 Jun
anubis14–16-0.0310%25 Jun
inferno13–9-0.0411%24 Jun
ancient1–13-0.0712%24 Jun
nuke11–13-0.0617%23 Jun
cache13–100.0013%22 Jun
mirage5–13-0.0011%22 Jun
overpass15–15-0.0113%22 Jun
inferno4–9-0.056%22 Jun
mirage16–130.0915%20 Jun
inferno13–5-0.0514%17 Jun
nuke10–13-0.0615%16 Jun
dust211–13-0.0613%15 Jun
inferno13–6-0.0415%15 Jun
mirage13–3-0.0318%13 Jun
ancient13–100.0112%11 Jun
train9–13-0.0113%11 Jun
inferno5–13-0.0326%10 Jun
mirage1–13-0.100%10 Jun
vertigo13–30.1014%8 Jun
train7–13-0.0014%7 Jun
ancient10–130.099%7 Jun
ancient11–130.026%31 May
cache2–7-0.0123%31 May
train13–4-0.0115%31 May
nuke6–130.0712%30 May
ancient10–13-0.0217%30 May
dust213–9-0.018%29 May
mirage1–13-0.0417%29 May
vertigo13–60.0910%28 May
anubis11–130.049%28 May
nuke8–130.0217%28 May
cache13–80.0012%28 May
ancient11–13-0.0313%27 May
overpass5–13-0.1014%26 May
ancient13–9-0.007%26 May
mirage11–13-0.033%25 May
cache4–13-0.0710%25 May
mirage8–13-0.0513%23 May
inferno6–13-0.0222%21 May
overpass13–5-0.0017%21 May
nuke0–13-0.0818%21 May
vertigo9–130.0615%21 May
dust213–3-0.0314%21 May
anubis13–60.0417%20 May
anubis5–13-0.0119%20 May
nuke13–70.0016%20 May
ancient8–13-0.0021%20 May
nuke13–90.0514%20 May
nuke13–90.0213%19 May
mirage12–12-0.024%18 May
dust212–12-0.0115%18 May
mirage10–13-0.035%18 May
ancient13–60.0111%16 May
ancient13–11-0.0313%16 May
ancient6–13-0.0312%13 May
inferno7–13-0.0813%13 May
office11–13-0.100%9 May
cache9–13-0.070%9 May
anubis16–12-0.036%6 May
mirage13–90.0212%5 May
cache12–12-0.0318%5 May
dust214–16-0.0315%29 Jan
nuke15–15-0.0917%26 Jan
anubis12–16-0.059%26 Jan
nuke9–13-0.0610%16 Jan
inferno10–13-0.0019%16 Jan
dust26–13-0.0914%2 Jan
overpass7–130.0311%2 Jan
vertigo13–90.056%24 Dec
nuke5–13-0.0023%24 Dec
vertigo3–130.0326%22 Dec
vertigo8–13-0.069%4 Dec
dust213–11-0.0724%29 Oct
overpass8–13-0.0121%23 Oct
vertigo12–12-0.0816%15 Oct
inferno6–13-0.039%13 Oct
inferno11–13-0.057%13 Oct
mirage13–5-0.0114%12 Oct
vertigo12–12-0.0213%12 Oct
vertigo10–13-0.0112%8 Oct
nuke13–9-0.068%7 Oct
vertigo13–40.0217%7 Oct
inferno13–8-0.0413%30 Sept
nuke9–130.017%25 Sept
inferno8–130.0132%25 Sept
vertigo13–4-0.106%18 Sept
inferno13–90.0017%7 Sept
vertigo5–13-0.1045%7 Sept
inferno2–9-0.1825%6 Sept

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →