Dirty Dan — CS2 Stats

US76561198093027428[U:1:132761700]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,499Tracked matches46%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.8 SolidAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating23,139Top 50% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#6261 of 26639 tracked

WingmanMaster Guardian Elite

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim72

Positioning59

Utility51

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY41–53–6Last 10041%Win rateLWWWWLWTLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.2

Aggression9.6

Utility5.1

Positioning5.9

Opening Duels5.5

Clutch1.8

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like ropz 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: higher opening-fight frequency; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 61% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 61% on CT to 43% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Counter-strafing. Only 69% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.2

Positioning5.9

Utility5.1

Mechanics4.1

Opening Duels5.5

Win Impact3.8

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.02

first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time533ms−28ms

first ⅓ avg 561ms → last ⅓ avg 533ms

Headshot accuracy14.9%+0.4%

first ⅓ avg 14.5% → last ⅓ avg 14.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — dust2 13–1

13–1Biggest win — dust2

4Longest win streak

6–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

7Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 57% over 7dust2Weakest map · 38% over 53

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	C	53	20–33	38%	0.01
cache	C	19	8–11	42%	-0.01
anubis	A	7	4–3	57%	-0.00
mirage	B	6	3–3	50%	0.06
ancient	—	3	1–2	33%	-0.01
nuke	—	3	0–3	0%	-0.01
debris	—	3	1–2	33%	-0.04
inferno	—	3	2–1	67%	0.06
overpass	—	1	0–1	0%	0.08
fachwerk	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.01
eldorado	—	1	1–0	100%	0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 53). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

401Matches

50%Win rate

0.91Avg K/D

83.4ADR

36%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

29%1v1 clutch win

22%1v2 clutch win

13Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Dust2	25	48%	1.25	16.0
Mirage	21	38%	0.78	13.2
Anubis	19	63%	1.04	17.2
Inferno	14	64%	1.01	14.4
Ancient	13	46%	0.99	14.1
Nuke	8	38%	0.74	12.8
Overpass	6	33%	0.94	16.2
Vertigo	5	20%	0.79	13.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.9%Headshot accuracy

38.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

40.2%Spray accuracy

68.6%Counter-strafing

8.5°Preaim

535msReaction time

42.9%T opening success

61.1%CT opening success

0.72Enemies flashed / flash

4.0%Flash assists

7.49HE damage / grenade

7.44Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Best CS2 Crosshair
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 13.9328% — below the 15% mark we flag
Aim Training →

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 53 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	7–13	-0.02	9%	29 Aug →
dust2	13–11	-0.02	13%	26 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.11	9%	22 Aug →
dust2	13–10	-0.02	15%	22 Aug →
anubis	13–11	-0.03	21%	22 Aug →
cache	4–13	-0.02	12%	22 Aug →
dust2	13–7	-0.02	12%	22 Aug →
dust2	15–15	0.05	17%	21 Aug →
dust2	5–13	-0.03	5%	21 Aug →
cache	13–6	0.01	7%	21 Aug →
dust2	10–13	0.03	12%	21 Aug →
dust2	13–3	0.07	16%	20 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.02	8%	19 Aug →
dust2	13–5	0.08	34%	19 Aug →
anubis	13–8	0.07	14%	17 Aug →
ancient	6–13	0.00	8%	16 Aug →
cache	13–2	0.06	6%	16 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.06	16%	15 Aug →
cache	14–16	-0.01	15%	15 Aug →
anubis	13–9	0.03	16%	15 Aug →
cache	11–13	-0.02	11%	15 Aug →
nuke	15–15	0.01	13%	15 Aug →
anubis	1–11	-0.06	21%	13 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.02	12%	9 Aug →
dust2	13–5	0.08	32%	8 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.01	12%	8 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.00	12%	7 Aug →
dust2	9–13	0.07	10%	7 Aug →
cache	7–13	0.04	23%	7 Aug →
debris	9–5	-0.00	36%	7 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.02	10%	7 Aug →
dust2	13–10	-0.01	18%	6 Aug →
cache	13–7	0.02	18%	6 Aug →
dust2	13–2	-0.01	24%	6 Aug →
cache	12–12	-0.05	5%	5 Aug →
dust2	10–13	0.01	10%	4 Aug →
dust2	12–12	0.06	14%	30 Jul →
overpass	7–13	0.08	18%	29 Jul →
dust2	14–16	0.05	19%	29 Jul →
dust2	3–13	-0.04	10%	29 Jul →
nuke	3–13	0.02	14%	29 Jul →
anubis	13–8	-0.00	15%	28 Jul →
dust2	5–13	-0.07	11%	28 Jul →
dust2	13–5	0.10	16%	28 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.03	7%	28 Jul →
dust2	13–10	0.02	13%	26 Jul →
dust2	7–13	-0.01	5%	25 Jul →
mirage	9–13	0.10	20%	25 Jul →
mirage	13–2	0.08	16%	25 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.07	15%	25 Jul →
anubis	11–13	0.00	18%	25 Jul →
nuke	4–13	-0.06	15%	25 Jul →
dust2	12–12	0.02	12%	24 Jul →
inferno	13–11	0.04	34%	24 Jul →
dust2	10–13	-0.03	14%	23 Jul →
dust2	9–13	0.03	23%	23 Jul →
cache	1–13	-0.03	27%	21 Jul →
dust2	12–12	0.02	13%	21 Jul →
ancient	4–13	-0.03	12%	21 Jul →
dust2	9–13	0.02	24%	21 Jul →
dust2	3–13	-0.03	14%	19 Jul →
dust2	13–6	0.03	9%	19 Jul →
cache	13–11	0.02	13%	18 Jul →
dust2	5–13	0.00	10%	18 Jul →
mirage	7–13	0.01	24%	18 Jul →
cache	2–13	-0.06	15%	18 Jul →
cache	10–13	-0.00	13%	18 Jul →
cache	10–13	0.01	10%	17 Jul →
dust2	7–13	-0.01	7%	17 Jul →
cache	11–13	-0.03	24%	17 Jul →
dust2	13–2	0.02	6%	17 Jul →
dust2	16–12	-0.02	14%	17 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.04	22%	17 Jul →
dust2	7–13	-0.01	12%	16 Jul →
inferno	13–7	0.07	17%	16 Jul →
dust2	13–16	-0.00	16%	16 Jul →
dust2	13–16	-0.04	12%	14 Jul →
dust2	5–13	-0.03	14%	14 Jul →
mirage	0–13	-0.03	0%	13 Jul →
anubis	8–13	-0.04	18%	13 Jul →
dust2	7–13	-0.04	20%	13 Jul →
dust2	4–13	-0.07	12%	13 Jul →
cache	13–11	-0.03	25%	12 Jul →
cache	13–4	-0.08	25%	12 Jul →
dust2	13–5	-0.00	11%	12 Jul →
cache	4–13	-0.09	20%	12 Jul →
dust2	13–6	0.00	7%	12 Jul →
dust2	11–13	0.02	23%	12 Jul →
inferno	8–13	0.07	19%	12 Jul →
ancient	13–9	0.00	13%	12 Jul →
debris	2–9	-0.18	9%	11 Jul →
dust2	13–1	0.13	15%	11 Jul →
fachwerk	13–7	-0.01	19%	11 Jul →
dust2	9–13	0.00	19%	11 Jul →
dust2	13–10	0.07	15%	11 Jul →
eldorado	9–5	0.05	9%	11 Jul →
debris	6–9	0.08	12%	11 Jul →
dust2	13–10	0.03	15%	10 Jul →
dust2	1–13	-0.11	11%	9 Jul →
cache	13–1	0.04	8%	9 Jul →