nenQ*BIG BOOTY ENJOYER — CS2 Stats

76561198092316680[U:1:132050952]✓ No bans

424Tracked matches45%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating21,712Top 50% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#10562 of 34707 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,661 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGnenQ*BIG BOOTY ENJOYERFACEITLevel 8 · 1,661 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER21,712 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88
Positioning33
Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD57376Last 10057%Win rateLLWLWLLLTW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.8
Aggression4.0
Utility5.2
Positioning3.3
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch5.6

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafing

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Counter-strafing. 91% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 55 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 607ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8
Positioning3.3
Utility5.2
Mechanics9.1
Opening Duels0.8
Win Impact3.3

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time566ms−73ms
first ⅓ avg 639ms → last ⅓ avg 566ms
Headshot accuracy27.5%−1.1%
first ⅓ avg 28.6% → last ⅓ avg 27.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.27Best rating — mirage 9–0
130Biggest win — mirage
7Longest win streak
L2Current streak
75In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 77% over 13mirageWeakest map · 41% over 17
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A1912763%0.01
cacheB189950%0.01
mirageC1771041%0.02
infernoS1310377%0.02
anubisB115645%0.00
nukeA85363%-0.00
vertigoS64267%0.02
ancientA53260%0.02
train21150%-0.02
overpass110100%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (41% over 17). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

127Matches
62%Win rate
1.52Avg K/D
86.8ADR
57%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

48%1v1 clutch win
32%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage4766%1.6218.0
Dust22669%1.5116.5
Ancient2143%1.3617.7
Inferno1669%1.6020.0
Nuke967%1.2715.1
Overpass333%1.2720.3
Vertigo250%1.4719.0
Anubis250%1.4618.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

28.5%Headshot accuracy
32.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.6%Spray accuracy
91.1%Counter-strafing
7.8°Preaim
607msReaction time
21.5%T opening success
36.2%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
8.6%Flash assists
3.96HE damage / grenade
15.78Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 21.4668% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

41% win rate across 17 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage3–130.0018%24 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0122%23 Jul
dust213–8-0.0334%23 Jul
dust24–13-0.1343%23 Jul
inferno13–7-0.0222%21 Jul
cache5–13-0.0045%21 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0524%20 Jul
mirage6–130.0650%19 Jul
anubis15–150.0122%18 Jul
cache13–110.0224%18 Jul
dust213–110.0236%18 Jul
cache11–130.0330%17 Jul
cache13–10.0245%17 Jul
mirage0–2-0.110%17 Jul
anubis13–50.0727%17 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0139%16 Jul
dust216–120.0823%16 Jul
cache13–7-0.0227%16 Jul
nuke1–8-0.030%14 Jul
inferno9–130.0223%14 Jul
nuke2–13-0.0725%14 Jul
dust213–60.0415%14 Jul
inferno13–60.0521%13 Jul
dust214–16-0.0543%13 Jul
mirage13–0-0.0075%12 Jul
ancient13–20.1042%12 Jul
cache0–13-0.030%12 Jul
nuke0–13-0.060%12 Jul
cache0–13-0.090%12 Jul
dust213–60.1234%12 Jul
dust214–16-0.0231%12 Jul
cache13–80.1140%12 Jul
anubis13–7-0.0725%11 Jul
inferno13–50.0233%11 Jul
nuke13–2-0.0053%11 Jul
anubis13–50.0436%11 Jul
cache13–7-0.0319%10 Jul
nuke13–40.1034%10 Jul
cache8–13-0.0331%9 Jul
mirage13–50.0827%9 Jul
inferno8–60.0555%8 Jul
mirage10–130.0123%8 Jul
cache12–120.0230%7 Jul
inferno13–7-0.0222%6 Jul
mirage10–3-0.097%6 Jul
dust211–2-0.0250%5 Jul
inferno13–80.0023%5 Jul
dust213–80.0328%5 Jul
cache4–13-0.0114%5 Jul
mirage12–10.0221%4 Jul
vertigo13–90.0624%4 Jul
mirage12–120.1436%3 Jul
cache0–13-0.050%3 Jul
vertigo6–13-0.0231%3 Jul
nuke13–100.0319%1 Jul
mirage13–3-0.0314%1 Jul
dust213–11-0.0127%1 Jul
anubis12–120.0434%30 Jun
train6–0-0.0167%30 Jun
nuke13–50.0313%30 Jun
inferno13–110.0419%29 Jun
ancient13–9-0.0333%29 Jun
vertigo13–50.0725%29 Jun
overpass13–1-0.026%28 Jun
dust212–120.0636%28 Jun
cache7–10.0627%28 Jun
dust25–13-0.0339%27 Jun
cache8–130.0726%26 Jun
dust216–140.0315%26 Jun
ancient13–100.0723%24 Jun
mirage9–00.2761%24 Jun
cache13–50.0640%24 Jun
dust27–13-0.0424%23 Jun
mirage4–13-0.0635%23 Jun
dust213–7-0.0229%22 Jun
anubis12–12-0.0223%22 Jun
mirage13–4-0.0418%21 Jun
anubis10–13-0.0516%20 Jun
inferno13–50.0735%20 Jun
train3–13-0.0235%19 Jun
ancient0–13-0.060%19 Jun
ancient10–130.0137%16 Jun
inferno4–13-0.0134%14 Jun
dust213–20.0550%12 Jun
cache13–100.0239%11 Jun
mirage0–13-0.020%11 Jun
vertigo13–20.1223%11 Jun
vertigo0–13-0.0823%9 Jun
vertigo13–5-0.0215%9 Jun
inferno13–100.0331%7 Jun
dust213–00.0150%4 Jun
anubis13–50.0921%2 Jun
anubis13–110.0122%30 May
anubis2–13-0.0340%30 May
mirage4–130.0220%24 May
mirage7–130.0629%18 May
inferno13–5-0.0124%18 May
dust22–130.0228%18 May
cache13–60.0030%18 May
nuke13–70.0247%18 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →