Exo — CS2 Stats

76561198091492971[U:1:131227243]✓ No bans

1,316Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.0 DevelopingPassive Rifler
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGExoFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim64
Positioning43
Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY57412Last 10057%Win rateLWWLLWLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.4
Aggression4.1
Utility5.9
Positioning4.3
Opening Duels1.0
Clutch4.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 42% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 655ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.4
Positioning4.3
Utility5.9
Mechanics6.0
Opening Duels1.5
Win Impact2.8

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time637ms+17ms
first ⅓ avg 620ms → last ⅓ avg 637ms
Headshot accuracy15.2%+3.0%
first ⅓ avg 12.2% → last ⅓ avg 15.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.20Best rating — mirage 13–0
130Biggest win — mirage
8Longest win streak
147In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 80% over 5anubisWeakest map · 38% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB30161453%0.02
dust2A1911858%0.00
ancientS1410471%0.00
anubisC83538%0.03
nukeB84450%0.02
infernoC83538%-0.01
overpassS86275%0.04
cacheS54180%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

60Matches
47%Win rate
1.31Avg K/D
83.0ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1547%1.7018.7
Inferno1040%1.4319.8
Anubis560%1.4818.2
Dust2520%1.2918.0
Ancient580%1.6115.0
Nuke367%0.9412.3
Train250%0.7213.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.0%Headshot accuracy
38.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.6%Spray accuracy
77.1%Counter-strafing
10.5°Preaim
655msReaction time
26.3%T opening success
41.8%CT opening success
0.64Enemies flashed / flash
4.6%Flash assists
9.28HE damage / grenade
14.52Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 26.3098% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage1–13-0.0513%29 Aug
cache13–100.057%22 Aug
cache13–60.0218%31 Jul
anubis10–13-0.0110%30 Jul
nuke5–130.0012%27 Jul
dust213–7-0.0018%26 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0223%26 Jul
dust29–13-0.0324%26 Jul
cache13–70.026%26 Jul
mirage13–40.1112%26 Jul
mirage14–16-0.0113%26 Jul
anubis10–13-0.0117%26 Jul
mirage13–16-0.0416%23 Jul
ancient13–9-0.0718%21 Jul
dust210–130.0313%20 Jul
dust213–20.0716%18 Jul
dust25–130.0117%18 Jul
cache13–10-0.0418%17 Jul
inferno13–10-0.0235%16 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0415%14 Jul
nuke11–130.0116%14 Jul
mirage4–130.0911%14 Jul
dust213–110.0210%14 Jul
dust213–11-0.0615%13 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0220%13 Jul
inferno8–130.0017%13 Jul
mirage10–13-0.017%13 Jul
mirage16–14-0.0213%13 Jul
ancient13–3-0.0015%12 Jul
ancient11–130.027%5 Jul
nuke12–160.0416%5 Jul
mirage13–70.0422%4 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0313%4 Jul
dust213–80.1719%4 Jul
inferno13–50.0612%4 Jul
overpass13–50.0112%4 Jul
nuke13–11-0.017%4 Jul
nuke13–20.0014%2 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0210%2 Jul
cache6–130.0217%2 Jul
anubis9–130.007%2 Jul
inferno4–13-0.0514%30 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0315%30 Jun
mirage13–16-0.014%29 Jun
overpass13–110.0510%29 Jun
anubis11–13-0.054%29 Jun
mirage9–130.0218%29 Jun
overpass13–60.1222%29 Jun
mirage8–130.0214%28 Jun
mirage13–110.039%28 Jun
dust23–13-0.116%28 Jun
inferno6–13-0.0524%28 Jun
mirage13–100.098%28 Jun
ancient13–11-0.0012%28 Jun
mirage13–5-0.0413%28 Jun
inferno8–13-0.0313%27 Jun
mirage13–70.0513%26 Jun
mirage9–13-0.029%26 Jun
mirage9–13-0.018%26 Jun
ancient13–100.0511%26 Jun
dust213–2-0.0126%25 Jun
nuke9–130.088%25 Jun
mirage13–7-0.0311%25 Jun
ancient7–130.0621%25 Jun
ancient13–50.0217%24 Jun
ancient13–90.028%24 Jun
mirage16–120.0020%24 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0215%24 Jun
dust213–9-0.0518%24 Jun
nuke16–120.0413%23 Jun
dust213–4-0.028%23 Jun
ancient13–90.0410%22 Jun
dust213–9-0.1219%22 Jun
ancient13–8-0.0720%22 Jun
overpass13–110.046%22 Jun
ancient16–140.029%22 Jun
overpass14–160.0310%22 Jun
dust26–4-0.0214%22 Jun
overpass16–140.0414%22 Jun
anubis15–150.0210%22 Jun
ancient13–16-0.0013%22 Jun
anubis13–30.156%22 Jun
dust213–90.0413%21 Jun
mirage13–110.0416%21 Jun
dust215–150.0215%21 Jun
anubis13–30.0618%21 Jun
nuke13–70.049%20 Jun
inferno13–70.078%20 Jun
dust210–13-0.0115%20 Jun
mirage13–00.2021%20 Jun
mirage13–110.0614%20 Jun
ancient13–11-0.015%20 Jun
mirage13–40.053%20 Jun
overpass10–13-0.0311%20 Jun
dust211–130.1017%20 Jun
mirage13–100.0412%20 Jun
overpass13–10.0611%19 Jun
mirage13–100.0611%19 Jun
dust24–130.058%19 Jun
anubis13–70.1111%19 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →