Gumbo.exe

Gumbo.exe — CS2 Stats

US76561198091069610[U:1:130803882]Steam profile ↗

470Tracked matches53%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.0 StrongAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating15,153Purple band · top ~27.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#3393 of 5248 tracked
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,107 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGGumbo.exeFACEITLevel 6 · 1,107 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER15,153 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim87
Positioning59
Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48502Last 10048%Win rateLLWWLLWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.7
Aggression7.4
Utility5.9
Positioning5.9
Opening Duels4.1
Clutch5.4

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 54% on CT to 39% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 617ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.7
Positioning5.9
Utility5.9
Mechanics8.6
Opening Duels4.1
Win Impact6.1

Composite 7.0/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time633ms−22ms
first ⅓ avg 654ms → last ⅓ avg 633ms
Headshot accuracy27.7%+3.5%
first ⅓ avg 24.2% → last ⅓ avg 27.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.17Best rating — cache 13–2
132Biggest win — cache
4Longest win streak
L2Current streak
910In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 63% over 30nukeWeakest map · 18% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheA30191163%0.02
dust2C1871139%0.01
ancientB147750%0.01
mirageB137654%-0.00
nukeD112918%0.00
infernoA95456%0.02
anubisD51420%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (18% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

78Matches
53%Win rate
1.25Avg K/D
84.5ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

47%1v1 clutch win
32%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1242%1.0915.8
Inferno1060%1.2120.3
Ancient757%1.1717.0
Dust2650%1.0614.0
Anubis4100%1.4625.0
Cache367%1.2321.7
Nuke30%0.8919.0
Overpass1100%0.539.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

27.2%Headshot accuracy
37.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.7%Spray accuracy
88.7%Counter-strafing
8.6°Preaim
617msReaction time
38.9%T opening success
53.9%CT opening success
0.72Enemies flashed / flash
9.9%Flash assists
6.13HE damage / grenade
11.12Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 38.8975% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

18% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke9–130.0038%26 Aug
dust210–130.0420%26 Aug
mirage13–90.0217%25 Aug
dust213–90.0336%25 Aug
dust27–130.0039%24 Aug
nuke13–160.0016%24 Aug
mirage13–60.0938%24 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0122%24 Aug
nuke14–16-0.0216%24 Aug
dust216–13-0.0047%23 Aug
cache6–130.0233%22 Aug
inferno13–6-0.0221%22 Aug
cache13–60.0523%22 Aug
cache13–30.0639%22 Aug
nuke9–130.0827%21 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0222%20 Aug
dust28–130.0225%20 Aug
mirage13–110.0138%20 Aug
cache13–60.0533%20 Aug
ancient13–70.0513%19 Aug
cache11–130.0525%19 Aug
dust210–13-0.0327%18 Aug
inferno13–50.0318%18 Aug
ancient13–90.0234%16 Aug
cache16–13-0.0211%16 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0120%14 Aug
mirage0–13-0.0750%14 Aug
cache13–70.0936%14 Aug
inferno8–10.0442%14 Aug
cache13–80.0218%14 Aug
dust20–13-0.0117%14 Aug
nuke0–13-0.0430%14 Aug
cache2–1-0.0325%14 Aug
nuke13–80.0231%13 Aug
anubis13–110.0217%13 Aug
ancient4–130.0123%13 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0216%12 Aug
cache13–90.0822%12 Aug
ancient16–130.0217%12 Aug
anubis10–130.0318%11 Aug
dust215–15-0.0134%11 Aug
inferno13–60.0811%10 Aug
cache14–160.0131%8 Aug
cache14–16-0.0126%7 Aug
dust213–11-0.0120%7 Aug
ancient13–7-0.0211%7 Aug
mirage13–60.0220%6 Aug
cache13–80.0717%6 Aug
ancient11–130.0019%5 Aug
dust211–130.0317%5 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0016%5 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0124%4 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0311%4 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0120%2 Aug
mirage6–130.0420%1 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0137%1 Aug
ancient13–40.1015%31 Jul
nuke13–80.0326%31 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0217%27 Jul
cache13–5-0.0622%27 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0820%27 Jul
cache11–130.0230%26 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0217%26 Jul
dust28–13-0.0324%26 Jul
dust24–13-0.0129%26 Jul
cache13–100.0348%26 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0517%26 Jul
ancient13–90.0220%26 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0318%26 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0212%25 Jul
cache13–11-0.0343%25 Jul
cache15–150.0519%25 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0521%25 Jul
dust213–80.1021%25 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0010%24 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0521%24 Jul
dust213–110.0120%19 Jul
inferno11–130.0017%19 Jul
cache13–20.1737%19 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0424%18 Jul
cache10–13-0.0618%18 Jul
dust213–100.0523%18 Jul
cache4–13-0.0648%18 Jul
dust211–40.1235%11 Jul
inferno8–130.0415%11 Jul
nuke13–16-0.0427%11 Jul
ancient13–100.0228%11 Jul
dust210–130.0324%11 Jul
inferno13–50.0530%11 Jul
mirage13–100.0325%10 Jul
dust28–13-0.0626%10 Jul
cache13–6-0.0021%28 Jun
cache4–13-0.0343%28 Jun
cache13–11-0.0215%26 Jun
cache13–50.0614%26 Jun
cache13–100.0625%21 Jun
cache13–11-0.0221%21 Jun
cache9–13-0.0421%21 Jun
cache13–50.0835%21 Jun
cache9–130.0422%21 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →