t0bYjackzoN

t0bYjackzoN — CS2 Stats

DE76561198090514248[U:1:130248520]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

996Tracked matches63%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.9 Solid
Premier CS Rating22,718Top 50% of 29,473 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#10752 of 45355 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

22,718Peak Premier on CSDB
1Days observed since 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 22,718
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 2,282 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-30
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-30

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGt0bYjackzoNPREMIER22,718 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim57
Positioning47
Utility65

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52462Last 10052%Win rateWLWWWWWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.7
Aggression4.7
Utility6.5
Positioning4.7
Opening Duels1.2
Clutch4.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 51% on CT to 18% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 683ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.7
Positioning4.7
Utility6.5
Mechanics6.1
Opening Duels2.7
Win Impact9.4

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time680ms−18ms
first ⅓ avg 698ms → last ⅓ avg 680ms
Headshot accuracy16.8%−1.1%
first ⅓ avg 17.9% → last ⅓ avg 16.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — agency 13–5
131Biggest win — anubis
6Longest win streak
1110In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 80% over 5nukeWeakest map · 20% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB21111052%0.02
ancientB105550%0.01
nukeD102820%0.01
infernoS107370%-0.00
anubisS96367%0.03
overpassS96367%-0.02
dust2C83538%-0.00
trainC73443%0.00
cacheS54180%-0.03
officeC52340%0.02
agency32167%0.06
vertigo21150%-0.04
jura1010%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

712Matches
51%Win rate
1.08Avg K/D
76.3ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno5853%1.1115.7
Ancient4657%1.0216.1
Anubis3531%0.9214.3
Mirage3447%1.1215.4
Nuke3348%0.9914.3
Dust23139%1.0414.9
Train1656%1.1616.6
Vertigo580%1.2514.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.7%Headshot accuracy
35.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.3%Spray accuracy
77.3%Counter-strafing
11.4°Preaim
683msReaction time
18.3%T opening success
51.3%CT opening success
0.63Enemies flashed / flash
7.3%Flash assists
9.39HE damage / grenade
10.72Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 18.3385% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–7-0.0524%3 Jul
cache1–13-0.1430%3 Jul
cache13–90.0312%2 Jul
dust213–80.1019%29 Jun
train13–60.0817%18 Jun
ancient13–9-0.0214%14 Jun
nuke13–60.0511%12 Jun
dust211–13-0.0119%11 Jun
inferno16–14-0.0216%11 Jun
inferno8–13-0.029%9 Jun
vertigo6–13-0.0511%4 Jun
vertigo13–9-0.0331%4 Jun
mirage13–40.0314%1 Jun
anubis13–60.0913%31 May
anubis13–10.0224%29 May
ancient13–40.0711%7 May
cache13–60.0113%5 May
dust26–130.0315%1 May
overpass13–10-0.0310%1 May
cache13–11-0.0118%1 May
ancient3–13-0.0420%26 Apr
train8–130.0322%24 Apr
train3–13-0.0226%24 Apr
train13–5-0.049%24 Apr
anubis13–70.0328%20 Apr
ancient13–100.0215%18 Apr
nuke11–13-0.039%17 Apr
nuke8–130.0115%3 Apr
nuke2–13-0.0421%3 Apr
anubis13–110.0813%1 Apr
anubis11–130.0115%1 Apr
inferno13–110.0115%31 Mar
overpass7–9-0.0715%29 Mar
nuke8–130.0214%29 Mar
office4–13-0.0326%19 Mar
office13–100.0318%18 Mar
office7–130.0411%18 Mar
mirage10–13-0.048%12 Mar
ancient13–11-0.0114%12 Mar
mirage11–13-0.0512%12 Mar
overpass13–11-0.0617%12 Mar
overpass13–110.0414%11 Mar
dust213–20.0112%6 Mar
overpass13–30.0421%2 Mar
mirage13–110.0217%2 Mar
ancient1–110.0416%25 Feb
inferno13–11-0.0610%25 Feb
dust23–13-0.0717%16 Feb
mirage13–80.0310%16 Feb
inferno7–130.0021%16 Feb
nuke11–13-0.016%12 Feb
overpass13–50.0521%11 Feb
mirage6–13-0.0218%11 Feb
anubis13–100.0311%10 Feb
anubis13–10.0111%10 Feb
mirage10–130.0820%9 Feb
mirage13–30.0626%7 Feb
mirage2–130.0315%7 Feb
mirage1–13-0.0915%7 Feb
mirage11–13-0.048%1 Feb
inferno13–6-0.007%31 Jan
mirage13–80.0219%31 Jan
mirage13–100.0610%30 Jan
office1–13-0.0218%27 Jan
dust211–13-0.0316%14 Sept
overpass7–13-0.0511%14 Sept
inferno13–70.0211%13 Sept
dust213–9-0.0016%13 Sept
train13–7-0.0125%13 Sept
mirage13–90.1015%11 Sept
overpass13–8-0.0128%11 Sept
ancient8–130.0515%11 Sept
train8–13-0.059%10 Sept
train10–130.0120%10 Sept
mirage13–80.0310%8 Sept
mirage15–15-0.0115%11 Aug
overpass8–13-0.0821%10 Aug
inferno13–60.0624%10 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0028%9 Aug
mirage3–80.0229%7 Aug
agency8–13-0.027%7 Aug
office13–90.0931%4 Aug
inferno13–16-0.0318%4 Aug
inferno13–50.0119%30 Jul
dust210–13-0.0420%8 Jul
mirage16–140.0723%3 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0310%3 Jul
nuke16–140.1313%1 Jul
nuke1–13-0.0717%19 Jun
mirage13–160.0522%17 Jun
ancient9–13-0.0317%16 Jun
anubis9–130.0114%12 Jun
mirage13–30.047%12 Jun
ancient13–30.0823%11 Jun
agency13–50.1523%11 Jun
agency13–100.0618%11 Jun
nuke10–130.0713%9 Jun
anubis11–130.0010%5 Jun
jura12–120.0424%4 Jun
mirage16–120.019%2 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →