highASShell — CS2 Stats

76561198089758951[U:1:129493223]

1,758Tracked matches44%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.5 SolidAggressive Rifler

FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanMaster Guardian Elite

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim94

Positioning58

Utility51

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY34–57–9Last 10034%Win rateWLWWLWLTTL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim9.4

Aggression7.8

Utility5.1

Positioning5.8

Opening Duels2.7

Clutch4.4

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like b1t 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 94 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 37 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 572ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.4

Positioning5.8

Utility5.1

Mechanics7.7

Opening Duels2.7

Win Impact3.0

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.02

first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time581ms−3ms

first ⅓ avg 583ms → last ⅓ avg 581ms

Headshot accuracy26.6%−2.2%

first ⅓ avg 28.8% → last ⅓ avg 26.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.18Best rating — boulder 13–2

13–2Biggest win — boulder

3Longest win streak

6–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

Map breakdown

shelterBest map · 45% over 11dust2Weakest map · 17% over 6

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
fachwerk	D	15	4–11	27%	0.04
shelter	B	11	5–6	45%	0.06
nuke	C	9	4–5	44%	-0.03
inferno	D	9	3–6	33%	0.02
cache	C	9	4–5	44%	0.01
boulder	C	9	4–5	44%	0.07
mirage	D	8	2–6	25%	0.01
anubis	D	7	2–5	29%	-0.00
dust2	D	6	1–5	17%	-0.00
ancient	—	4	2–2	50%	0.00
debris	—	3	0–3	0%	-0.08
office	—	3	0–3	0%	0.03
train	—	2	0–2	0%	0.08
vertigo	—	2	1–1	50%	0.05
overpass	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.07
italy	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.00
eldorado	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

195Matches

54%Win rate

1.08Avg K/D

78.5ADR

56%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win

20%1v2 clutch win

9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	33	55%	0.98	12.9
Ancient	27	56%	1.17	18.3
Nuke	24	67%	1.19	16.7
Inferno	18	50%	1.27	18.9
Anubis	17	53%	0.88	14.7
Dust2	17	35%	1.18	18.8
Vertigo	9	56%	1.10	14.3
Overpass	5	60%	0.94	14.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

26.5%Headshot accuracy

42.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

49.1%Spray accuracy

84.7%Counter-strafing

8.9°Preaim

572msReaction time

47.9%T opening success

34.0%CT opening success

0.57Enemies flashed / flash

4.4%Flash assists

6.74HE damage / grenade

11.22Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.
CT opening duels 33.9831% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
anubis	13–11	-0.03	32%	23 Aug →
mirage	2–13	-0.09	24%	23 Aug →
ancient	13–7	-0.01	22%	21 Aug →
nuke	13–11	0.05	27%	19 Aug →
dust2	11–13	0.00	30%	18 Aug →
ancient	13–9	0.00	15%	18 Aug →
inferno	6–13	-0.03	12%	18 Aug →
nuke	12–12	-0.03	35%	18 Aug →
train	12–12	0.06	30%	18 Aug →
anubis	7–13	0.01	33%	15 Aug →
dust2	11–13	0.02	40%	14 Aug →
cache	4–13	0.01	29%	14 Aug →
mirage	6–13	-0.04	35%	14 Aug →
overpass	13–8	-0.07	14%	14 Aug →
dust2	5–13	-0.05	19%	2 Aug →
mirage	3–13	0.00	75%	2 Aug →
debris	8–8	-0.07	24%	2 Aug →
mirage	6–13	0.08	39%	29 Jul →
boulder	12–12	0.10	29%	29 Jul →
fachwerk	13–11	0.12	20%	29 Jul →
cache	13–11	-0.01	20%	29 Jul →
ancient	12–12	-0.01	20%	28 Jul →
inferno	3–13	0.02	12%	28 Jul →
cache	13–8	0.00	25%	28 Jul →
dust2	3–13	0.02	38%	28 Jul →
anubis	11–13	-0.05	18%	28 Jul →
fachwerk	13–9	0.04	9%	28 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.05	20%	28 Jul →
shelter	4–13	0.05	31%	28 Jul →
anubis	13–9	0.04	13%	28 Jul →
boulder	12–12	0.04	43%	28 Jul →
shelter	6–13	-0.00	23%	27 Jul →
inferno	13–11	0.09	25%	27 Jul →
office	5–13	0.08	70%	27 Jul →
fachwerk	8–13	0.01	42%	27 Jul →
nuke	5–9	-0.16	10%	27 Jul →
inferno	1–9	-0.19	36%	27 Jul →
debris	4–9	-0.21	19%	27 Jul →
boulder	10–13	0.05	24%	27 Jul →
fachwerk	13–9	0.02	33%	27 Jul →
shelter	13–6	0.14	73%	26 Jul →
fachwerk	4–13	0.07	45%	26 Jul →
boulder	3–13	-0.01	28%	26 Jul →
anubis	6–13	0.04	48%	26 Jul →
mirage	1–13	0.08	44%	26 Jul →
train	12–12	0.11	25%	26 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.04	22%	26 Jul →
office	3–13	-0.10	50%	26 Jul →
anubis	6–13	-0.03	29%	26 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.01	26%	22 Jul →
boulder	13–7	0.13	60%	22 Jul →
fachwerk	0–2	0.02	33%	22 Jul →
office	7–13	0.12	62%	22 Jul →
shelter	12–12	0.00	22%	22 Jul →
inferno	9–2	0.14	23%	22 Jul →
inferno	9–3	0.15	19%	22 Jul →
nuke	9–6	-0.02	32%	22 Jul →
italy	10–13	-0.00	35%	22 Jul →
nuke	13–8	-0.00	28%	21 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.01	29%	21 Jul →
nuke	10–13	-0.01	17%	21 Jul →
cache	11–13	0.04	38%	21 Jul →
boulder	13–2	0.18	24%	21 Jul →
fachwerk	6–13	0.10	26%	20 Jul →
shelter	13–8	0.11	31%	20 Jul →
fachwerk	3–13	0.06	59%	20 Jul →
cache	0–11	-0.05	50%	20 Jul →
cache	9–13	-0.01	19%	18 Jul →
dust2	3–13	-0.01	43%	17 Jul →
mirage	13–5	0.01	20%	17 Jul →
inferno	6–13	-0.08	28%	17 Jul →
boulder	8–13	0.09	23%	16 Jul →
nuke	11–13	-0.02	28%	16 Jul →
shelter	13–5	0.06	33%	16 Jul →
boulder	13–7	0.03	25%	16 Jul →
eldorado	9–4	-0.04	64%	16 Jul →
debris	8–8	0.05	22%	16 Jul →
ancient	3–13	0.02	26%	15 Jul →
inferno	7–13	0.07	37%	15 Jul →
nuke	13–10	-0.07	20%	15 Jul →
nuke	11–13	0.03	34%	15 Jul →
fachwerk	2–13	-0.04	20%	15 Jul →
shelter	8–13	0.05	45%	15 Jul →
shelter	13–10	0.03	31%	15 Jul →
fachwerk	11–13	0.13	22%	14 Jul →
vertigo	9–4	0.07	21%	14 Jul →
cache	13–10	0.04	36%	14 Jul →
vertigo	3–13	0.04	31%	14 Jul →
fachwerk	13–10	0.02	25%	14 Jul →
fachwerk	9–13	0.00	18%	14 Jul →
shelter	13–6	0.04	16%	14 Jul →
fachwerk	7–13	0.06	29%	14 Jul →
fachwerk	11–13	0.00	37%	14 Jul →
shelter	4–13	0.11	20%	14 Jul →
fachwerk	9–13	0.00	30%	14 Jul →
shelter	4–13	0.06	37%	14 Jul →
boulder	13–5	0.05	20%	13 Jul →
inferno	6–13	0.01	33%	13 Jul →
cache	6–13	0.05	34%	13 Jul →
anubis	7–13	0.01	23%	13 Jul →