Uncooperative Squirrel — CS2 Stats

76561198087333139[U:1:127067411]

722Tracked matches48%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.0 StrongAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating22,660Top 50% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#6996 of 26742 tracked
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGUncooperative SquirrelFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER22,660 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim89
Positioning64
Utility64

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51454Last 10051%Win rateLLWWWWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.9
Aggression8.1
Utility6.4
Positioning6.4
Opening Duels2.8
Clutch0.0

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafing

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 96% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 89 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 596ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.9
Positioning6.4
Utility6.4
Mechanics8.5
Opening Duels2.8
Win Impact4.4

Composite 7.0/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time599ms−51ms
first ⅓ avg 650ms → last ⅓ avg 599ms
Headshot accuracy28.0%+5.3%
first ⅓ avg 22.7% → last ⅓ avg 28.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.22Best rating — ancient 13–1
131Biggest win — cache
5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
67In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 86% over 7dust2Weakest map · 0% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheB33171652%0.03
infernoS1711665%0.04
ancientC167944%0.03
mirageC94544%0.04
anubisS76186%0.04
nukeB63350%0.01
dust2D5050%0.04
overpass31233%0.09
boulder110100%0.12
vertigo1010%0.11
poseidon110100%0.17
sanctum1010%-0.15

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

124Matches
52%Win rate
1.47Avg K/D
71.8ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Vertigo2357%1.4817.2
Ancient2259%1.4220.1
Anubis2045%1.6118.4
Overpass1644%1.3118.5
Mirage1650%1.2817.1
Inferno1346%1.3816.8
Nuke560%1.1115.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

28.2%Headshot accuracy
39.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.7%Spray accuracy
88.3%Counter-strafing
9.2°Preaim
596msReaction time
44.0%T opening success
38.3%CT opening success
0.51Enemies flashed / flash
8.5%Flash assists
7.63HE damage / grenade
17.01Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 38.3114% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage7–130.0622%21 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0722%21 Aug
inferno13–30.1236%21 Aug
ancient13–60.0420%21 Aug
anubis13–40.0021%21 Aug
anubis13–90.0329%17 Aug
inferno7–130.1228%17 Aug
anubis8–130.0322%14 Aug
ancient4–130.0625%14 Aug
cache13–70.0625%14 Aug
inferno7–130.0019%14 Aug
boulder13–110.1225%9 Aug
cache9–130.0621%9 Aug
ancient15–150.0424%9 Aug
mirage13–70.0937%9 Aug
inferno13–5-0.0127%9 Aug
dust28–130.0130%9 Aug
ancient13–160.0436%9 Aug
cache13–10.0835%8 Aug
ancient13–80.0417%8 Aug
anubis13–50.0445%8 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0224%30 Jul
nuke14–160.0730%30 Jul
inferno16–130.0229%30 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0239%30 Jul
cache1–13-0.0738%30 Jul
inferno2–13-0.0540%29 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0619%29 Jul
anubis13–20.0827%29 Jul
inferno13–40.0143%27 Jul
cache13–40.1624%27 Jul
dust28–13-0.0220%27 Jul
cache13–80.0325%27 Jul
ancient12–120.0321%27 Jul
cache13–100.1418%15 Jul
dust24–130.1415%15 Jul
inferno13–50.0721%15 Jul
cache11–130.0535%15 Jul
cache13–110.0122%15 Jul
nuke13–40.0518%14 Jul
nuke13–2-0.0328%14 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0420%14 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0135%11 Jul
mirage14–16-0.0117%11 Jul
cache13–40.0730%11 Jul
ancient13–10.2222%10 Jul
cache13–16-0.0125%10 Jul
ancient13–70.0231%10 Jul
anubis10–10.0614%10 Jul
cache7–13-0.0712%10 Jul
inferno9–60.1420%1 Jul
overpass9–40.2014%1 Jul
cache13–70.0116%1 Jul
vertigo7–90.1118%1 Jul
inferno8–80.0026%30 Jun
inferno13–100.0624%30 Jun
dust29–130.0322%30 Jun
overpass11–130.0217%30 Jun
ancient13–50.0131%18 Jun
inferno13–16-0.0125%17 Jun
mirage5–130.0718%17 Jun
anubis13–60.0214%17 Jun
nuke9–13-0.0129%17 Jun
inferno13–110.0727%14 Jun
ancient10–130.0127%14 Jun
mirage13–110.0421%14 Jun
inferno13–60.0228%14 Jun
mirage13–70.1220%9 Jun
mirage13–11-0.0115%9 Jun
inferno13–80.0429%8 Jun
overpass10–130.0625%8 Jun
nuke13–6-0.0134%8 Jun
ancient13–80.0630%8 Jun
poseidon9–60.1724%5 Jun
cache8–13-0.0327%5 Jun
cache13–5-0.0516%5 Jun
mirage7–130.0216%5 Jun
sanctum3–9-0.1518%5 Jun
inferno13–50.0425%5 Jun
cache12–12-0.0329%4 Jun
dust29–130.0432%4 Jun
ancient13–100.0827%4 Jun
cache8–130.0120%13 May
cache13–110.0433%13 May
cache13–80.0927%13 May
cache8–13-0.0612%13 May
cache11–130.0619%12 May
cache13–90.0723%6 May
cache11–130.1020%6 May
cache2–130.0623%6 May
cache9–13-0.0422%6 May
cache9–20.1823%6 May
cache8–13-0.0419%6 May
cache9–30.0438%5 May
cache13–20.1513%5 May
cache7–13-0.0518%5 May
cache13–40.0721%5 May
cache13–6-0.0019%5 May
cache0–13-0.0810%5 May
inferno7–13-0.0223%28 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →