dzeNis — CS2 Stats

76561198086431097[U:1:126165369]

973Tracked matches45%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.1 DevelopingPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating22,509Top 50% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#6891 of 24821 tracked
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGdzeNisFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER22,509 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim74
Positioning36
Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD52462Last 10052%Win rateLLWWLLLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.4
Aggression1.4
Utility5.3
Positioning3.6
Opening Duels0.0

Effective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 78% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 38 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 552ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.4
Positioning3.6
Utility5.3
Mechanics6.5
Opening Duels0.0
Win Impact3.3

Composite 5.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time556ms−36ms
first ⅓ avg 592ms → last ⅓ avg 556ms
Headshot accuracy21.1%+1.0%
first ⅓ avg 20.1% → last ⅓ avg 21.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.20Best rating — ancient 13–4
131Biggest win — dust2
6Longest win streak
L2Current streak
54In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 68% over 19infernoWeakest map · 43% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientS1913668%0.02
nukeC167944%0.02
anubisB157847%0.01
infernoC146843%0.01
dust2B136746%-0.02
mirageS96367%-0.04
cacheC73443%-0.02
overpassA74357%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (43% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

92Matches
53%Win rate
1.04Avg K/D
ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

1v1 clutch win
1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage333%0.8816.0
Nuke2100%0.8814.5
Inferno10%0.7512.0
Anubis10%0.7110.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.8%Headshot accuracy
32.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.4%Spray accuracy
79.3%Counter-strafing
8.5°Preaim
552msReaction time
18.4%T opening success
28.6%CT opening success
0.70Enemies flashed / flash
5.4%Flash assists
8.26HE damage / grenade
10.78Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 18.4164% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage2–13-0.0523%27 Aug
cache9–13-0.0226%27 Aug
dust213–1-0.0124%23 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0862%23 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0419%23 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0619%23 Aug
ancient8–130.0515%23 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0121%23 Aug
dust24–9-0.0840%21 Aug
dust21–40.0525%21 Aug
inferno13–16-0.0316%21 Aug
mirage13–4-0.073%21 Aug
mirage13–2-0.0627%21 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0222%21 Aug
ancient2–13-0.0519%21 Aug
dust213–3-0.0128%21 Aug
ancient13–6-0.0312%15 Aug
ancient13–80.0015%13 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0216%13 Aug
anubis13–110.027%13 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0633%22 May
cache13–9-0.0411%22 May
anubis12–120.0422%16 May
cache3–13-0.0914%29 Apr
cache7–13-0.016%29 Apr
cache13–30.0923%29 Apr
cache2–13-0.0741%29 Apr
cache13–8-0.0118%29 Apr
dust22–12-0.1112%28 Apr
ancient13–60.1027%28 Apr
ancient11–130.0419%28 Apr
nuke13–100.0216%27 Apr
ancient13–5-0.0018%27 Apr
inferno13–40.1521%27 Apr
dust29–130.036%27 Apr
dust27–130.0123%27 Apr
ancient4–13-0.0423%21 Apr
anubis13–4-0.0616%21 Apr
inferno6–130.0021%20 Apr
overpass13–8-0.0223%2 Apr
dust213–5-0.0216%2 Apr
overpass1–13-0.0114%13 Mar
ancient13–50.0419%13 Mar
nuke8–130.0821%13 Mar
inferno13–60.0429%12 Mar
nuke6–130.0719%12 Mar
anubis5–13-0.0114%12 Mar
inferno15–150.0420%11 Mar
anubis13–80.0313%11 Mar
nuke7–13-0.069%11 Mar
nuke5–13-0.0026%10 Mar
inferno4–130.0113%9 Mar
ancient13–90.0216%9 Mar
anubis3–13-0.0313%9 Mar
overpass13–9-0.0318%9 Mar
mirage8–13-0.0420%8 Mar
nuke13–100.0019%8 Mar
dust25–13-0.048%8 Mar
inferno13–50.0214%4 Mar
nuke7–130.0232%4 Mar
anubis16–140.1014%3 Mar
ancient16–130.0419%3 Mar
ancient13–20.0111%2 Mar
dust213–90.0130%2 Mar
anubis10–130.0416%2 Mar
ancient13–40.2020%1 Mar
ancient13–4-0.047%1 Mar
nuke13–30.0417%1 Mar
anubis13–110.0319%1 Mar
inferno9–6-0.0325%1 Mar
nuke13–100.0114%23 Feb
anubis7–13-0.045%23 Feb
overpass9–13-0.0423%23 Feb
overpass13–80.0224%20 Feb
inferno13–80.0422%20 Feb
ancient10–13-0.0421%20 Feb
nuke9–130.0316%20 Feb
dust21–13-0.1028%20 Feb
inferno8–130.0325%18 Feb
mirage13–50.0112%17 Feb
overpass13–20.0222%17 Feb
nuke13–30.1324%17 Feb
anubis12–160.0218%17 Feb
ancient13–50.0228%13 Feb
nuke7–13-0.0614%13 Feb
anubis10–13-0.0529%13 Feb
anubis13–110.0129%13 Feb
nuke13–110.0216%12 Feb
inferno13–7-0.0226%12 Feb
dust213–40.0529%12 Feb
mirage13–5-0.0122%12 Feb
anubis13–20.0724%12 Feb
overpass9–13-0.0229%11 Feb
inferno8–13-0.0714%11 Feb
dust213–5-0.0514%11 Feb
nuke11–13-0.0017%10 Feb
ancient13–40.0912%10 Feb
ancient13–90.0212%10 Feb
nuke13–80.0212%10 Feb
anubis10–130.0521%9 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →