Silas Grent

Silas Grent — CS2 Stats

US76561198085292082[U:1:125026354]Steam profile ↗

1,364Tracked matches52%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.9 DevelopingPassive Rifler
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSilas GrentFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim60
Positioning48
Utility48

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD45514Last 10045%Win rateLLLTLWWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.0
Aggression4.4
Utility4.8
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels1.2
Clutch2.6

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashesLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.76 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 44% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 653ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.0
Positioning4.8
Utility4.8
Mechanics4.6
Opening Duels1.7
Win Impact5.6

Composite 4.9/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time654ms+48ms
first ⅓ avg 606ms → last ⅓ avg 654ms
Headshot accuracy16.4%+3.7%
first ⅓ avg 12.6% → last ⅓ avg 16.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.23Best rating — nuke 10–3
130Biggest win — inferno
6Longest win streak
L3Current streak
67In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 86% over 7cacheWeakest map · 13% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A22121055%0.01
mirageC2071335%0.01
nukeA169756%0.04
ancientC135838%0.02
overpassC94544%0.01
cacheD81713%0.03
infernoS76186%0.05
anubis41325%0.03
vertigo1010%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

88Matches
55%Win rate
1.28Avg K/D
96.4ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
33%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1958%1.1116.4
Nuke1464%1.2418.6
Inferno1471%1.4221.0
Anubis1050%1.4120.1
Overpass862%1.8916.9
Vertigo633%1.1215.2
Ancient475%1.3415.5
Dust2333%1.3123.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.0%Headshot accuracy
38.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.3%Spray accuracy
70.6%Counter-strafing
11.2°Preaim
653msReaction time
25.8%T opening success
43.8%CT opening success
0.76Enemies flashed / flash
8.5%Flash assists
7.51HE damage / grenade
3.55Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 3.5545 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 25.7808% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

13% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient9–13-0.0225%20 Aug
dust26–130.0419%20 Aug
cache9–13-0.0112%15 Aug
nuke12–120.0613%15 Aug
cache11–130.0416%13 Aug
mirage13–50.0415%13 Aug
nuke13–80.0410%13 Aug
overpass11–130.0315%13 Aug
dust27–130.0419%13 Aug
dust213–70.0118%10 Aug
cache9–13-0.0315%10 Aug
mirage13–5-0.0415%10 Aug
inferno13–90.0813%3 Aug
nuke13–70.0414%29 Jul
mirage11–130.059%29 Jul
nuke5–130.0413%13 Jul
inferno13–80.0514%12 Jul
dust23–13-0.0319%12 Jul
cache13–100.0823%12 Jul
vertigo3–130.049%12 Jul
mirage16–120.0118%9 Jul
cache5–13-0.0412%9 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0523%9 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0819%9 Jul
dust213–20.0318%9 Jul
ancient13–90.1015%9 Jul
dust213–7-0.0221%8 Jul
ancient13–30.0721%6 Jul
dust213–80.1713%6 Jul
nuke10–30.2315%22 Jun
dust21–13-0.0221%22 Jun
ancient7–130.0720%22 Jun
dust25–13-0.0219%19 Jun
nuke13–9-0.0115%16 Jun
overpass7–130.0125%16 Jun
inferno13–50.159%15 Jun
ancient15–150.0310%12 Jun
overpass4–13-0.048%12 Jun
anubis13–80.0619%12 Jun
nuke13–30.0617%11 Jun
dust210–130.0317%11 Jun
overpass16–13-0.0315%11 Jun
anubis10–13-0.0212%11 Jun
nuke13–110.1213%10 Jun
mirage4–130.0013%10 Jun
nuke3–130.043%10 Jun
mirage3–13-0.0618%10 Jun
overpass13–50.0317%10 Jun
dust213–100.0114%10 Jun
dust24–13-0.059%10 Jun
overpass9–13-0.0318%9 Jun
nuke13–5-0.0213%9 Jun
inferno13–50.0713%9 Jun
mirage13–90.0610%9 Jun
nuke7–130.0521%9 Jun
inferno13–90.0115%9 Jun
nuke13–110.0216%8 Jun
inferno7–13-0.035%8 Jun
ancient9–13-0.0115%8 Jun
dust27–130.007%8 Jun
dust29–130.0315%8 Jun
ancient13–10.1425%8 Jun
mirage9–13-0.0019%8 Jun
dust213–10-0.0319%6 Jun
ancient13–110.016%6 Jun
anubis7–130.0112%6 Jun
dust213–2-0.035%5 Jun
ancient13–6-0.0216%5 Jun
dust213–9-0.029%5 Jun
mirage4–13-0.0612%5 Jun
inferno13–00.0110%5 Jun
mirage13–90.1017%4 Jun
dust23–13-0.0413%4 Jun
nuke11–13-0.0415%4 Jun
dust213–90.0813%4 Jun
nuke13–6-0.0222%4 Jun
anubis11–130.059%2 Jun
mirage13–8-0.0610%2 Jun
nuke4–130.0113%2 Jun
mirage11–130.0011%2 Jun
cache3–130.049%2 Jun
dust213–11-0.008%2 Jun
overpass16–140.008%2 Jun
cache9–130.0311%2 Jun
dust213–110.0612%2 Jun
mirage7–130.0721%2 Jun
mirage12–16-0.0412%1 Jun
mirage13–100.0216%1 Jun
mirage12–160.0110%1 Jun
nuke10–13-0.048%1 Jun
overpass6–130.0514%1 Jun
dust213–5-0.0219%1 Jun
ancient7–13-0.0110%1 Jun
cache10–130.1112%29 May
mirage11–130.038%28 May
overpass16–120.0410%28 May
mirage9–13-0.0313%28 May
ancient8–13-0.0210%28 May
ancient12–120.0526%26 May
mirage12–120.1111%26 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →