Quahog P.I. — CS2 Stats

76561198084781106[U:1:124515378]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,773Tracked matches40%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating7.0 StrongAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating25,475Top 25% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.8% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#2286 of 18117 tracked

FaceitLevel 7 · 1,589 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanMaster Guardian Elite

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

25,475Peak Premier on CSDB

1,589Peak Faceit ELO on CSDB

1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Faceit ELO

At peak — 1,589
Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 162 to go
Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
Level 8 first seen 2026-08-28
Level 7 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

At peak — 25,475
Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 4,525 to go
Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
Red band first seen 2026-08-28
Pink band first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim90

Positioning56

Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52–48Last 10052%Win rateLWLWLWWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim9.0

Aggression8.0

Utility5.5

Positioning5.6

Opening Duels4.2

Clutch2.8

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like b1t 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 90 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Counter-strafing. 94% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

CT openings. 60% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 34 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 60% on CT to 34% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 620ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.0

Positioning5.6

Utility5.5

Mechanics9.8

Opening Duels4.2

Win Impact1.7

Composite 7.0/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01

first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01

Reaction time620ms−36ms

first ⅓ avg 657ms → last ⅓ avg 620ms

Headshot accuracy31.0%+1.4%

first ⅓ avg 29.6% → last ⅓ avg 31.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — mirage 13–4

13–1Biggest win — ancient

6Longest win streak

10–12In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

6Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 67% over 6infernoWeakest map · 40% over 5

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	B	29	14–15	48%	-0.01
mirage	A	26	15–11	58%	-0.01
anubis	B	13	6–7	46%	-0.01
ancient	A	11	6–5	55%	0.00
cache	B	10	5–5	50%	0.00
nuke	S	6	4–2	67%	-0.01
inferno	C	5	2–3	40%	-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,181Matches

50%Win rate

1.04Avg K/D

84.4ADR

52%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win

26%1v2 clutch win

9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	173	53%	1.07	17.0
Dust2	139	46%	1.06	16.8
Anubis	82	44%	1.11	17.5
Ancient	82	55%	1.08	16.4
Inferno	59	41%	1.00	15.8
Nuke	57	61%	1.10	16.9
Cache	15	40%	0.91	15.7
Train	14	50%	1.18	20.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

30.7%Headshot accuracy

36.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

39.1%Spray accuracy

94.2%Counter-strafing

9.9°Preaim

620msReaction time

33.5%T opening success

60.3%CT opening success

0.66Enemies flashed / flash

9.2%Flash assists

7.83HE damage / grenade

6.89Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 33.5037% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	8–13	0.00	19%	15 Aug →
mirage	13–8	-0.04	24%	15 Aug →
anubis	11–13	0.06	39%	14 Aug →
dust2	13–4	0.05	27%	13 Aug →
mirage	10–13	0.01	36%	13 Aug →
ancient	13–7	-0.01	18%	13 Aug →
mirage	13–10	-0.02	49%	13 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.06	37%	12 Aug →
cache	7–13	-0.06	29%	12 Aug →
nuke	13–6	-0.04	48%	9 Aug →
mirage	13–9	-0.02	27%	8 Aug →
anubis	9–13	-0.00	39%	7 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.00	27%	7 Aug →
inferno	6–13	-0.02	29%	6 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.04	23%	3 Aug →
dust2	13–11	-0.02	34%	2 Aug →
anubis	8–13	-0.01	31%	2 Aug →
inferno	16–19	-0.04	30%	31 Jul →
dust2	4–13	-0.08	50%	31 Jul →
cache	8–13	0.02	31%	30 Jul →
dust2	3–13	0.00	14%	30 Jul →
anubis	11–13	0.01	36%	30 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.07	21%	30 Jul →
anubis	13–8	0.02	29%	30 Jul →
nuke	13–8	0.03	27%	29 Jul →
dust2	2–13	-0.03	42%	24 Jul →
cache	13–8	0.00	31%	24 Jul →
mirage	14–16	-0.05	20%	24 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.01	30%	23 Jul →
dust2	7–13	-0.03	28%	21 Jul →
anubis	6–13	-0.03	24%	21 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.05	37%	21 Jul →
mirage	10–13	-0.01	38%	20 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.05	22%	20 Jul →
inferno	6–13	-0.03	25%	20 Jul →
ancient	10–13	0.05	21%	20 Jul →
dust2	16–14	0.01	31%	20 Jul →
anubis	13–9	-0.03	46%	19 Jul →
dust2	13–10	-0.03	23%	19 Jul →
cache	13–9	0.02	27%	19 Jul →
dust2	13–9	-0.05	29%	19 Jul →
ancient	13–16	0.03	24%	19 Jul →
mirage	5–13	-0.06	24%	19 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.04	22%	18 Jul →
dust2	13–3	-0.04	38%	18 Jul →
dust2	13–10	-0.07	22%	18 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.02	38%	17 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.04	42%	16 Jul →
inferno	13–7	0.05	33%	16 Jul →
mirage	13–9	-0.04	33%	16 Jul →
cache	7–13	-0.01	18%	16 Jul →
nuke	5–13	-0.03	27%	15 Jul →
dust2	5–13	-0.03	17%	15 Jul →
inferno	9–3	-0.03	42%	14 Jul →
anubis	13–8	-0.05	34%	14 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.05	32%	14 Jul →
mirage	13–10	-0.05	52%	13 Jul →
anubis	11–13	-0.05	19%	13 Jul →
mirage	13–2	-0.06	29%	13 Jul →
mirage	13–5	0.03	27%	13 Jul →
dust2	10–13	-0.07	16%	13 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.00	30%	12 Jul →
ancient	3–13	-0.06	44%	12 Jul →
dust2	11–13	-0.04	30%	12 Jul →
dust2	16–14	0.04	30%	11 Jul →
ancient	10–13	-0.00	23%	11 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.07	33%	10 Jul →
dust2	5–13	-0.03	22%	10 Jul →
mirage	13–3	0.02	40%	10 Jul →
dust2	13–11	-0.02	44%	10 Jul →
nuke	13–9	-0.01	34%	10 Jul →
ancient	13–8	-0.02	21%	10 Jul →
dust2	11–13	-0.04	28%	10 Jul →
ancient	13–11	-0.02	26%	9 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.05	35%	9 Jul →
ancient	13–1	0.03	32%	9 Jul →
cache	13–11	0.02	33%	9 Jul →
anubis	13–7	-0.04	33%	9 Jul →
ancient	4–13	-0.02	33%	9 Jul →
dust2	2–13	-0.07	48%	9 Jul →
cache	13–11	0.01	30%	9 Jul →
cache	11–13	-0.03	24%	8 Jul →
cache	12–16	-0.03	14%	8 Jul →
dust2	10–13	-0.02	24%	8 Jul →
anubis	6–13	-0.06	29%	7 Jul →
mirage	13–9	-0.04	24%	7 Jul →
nuke	11–13	0.00	28%	7 Jul →
ancient	13–6	0.02	35%	6 Jul →
dust2	8–13	0.03	35%	6 Jul →
dust2	6–13	0.00	26%	6 Jul →
ancient	13–10	0.00	15%	6 Jul →
dust2	11–13	0.00	14%	6 Jul →
anubis	13–8	0.01	29%	6 Jul →
mirage	10–13	0.03	29%	6 Jul →
anubis	13–8	0.03	34%	6 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.04	38%	6 Jul →
mirage	2–13	-0.03	24%	6 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.06	37%	3 Jul →
nuke	13–6	-0.04	28%	2 Jul →
mirage	13–4	0.13	28%	1 Jul →

Show all 100 matchesShow fewer

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches

Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

Explore CSDB.gg

Sensitivity ConverterConvert sensitivity between CS2 and other games eDPI CalculatorCalculate your effective DPI cm/360 CalculatorMouse distance per full turn Resolution CalculatorCompare aspect ratios and resolutions Crosshair GeneratorBuild and preview custom crosshairs

Tools

Sticker Craft MakerPlan and price a CS2 sticker craft with live prices on every piece CS2 Stats TrackerLook up any player: Premier rating, Faceit level, matches and skill breakdown Trust Factor CheckerEstimate your CS2 Trust Factor from the signals Valve has acknowledged

Learn & Explore

Most Traded CS2 SkinsRanked by completed sales — transaction data, not listings Cheapest Knives in CS2Every knife type ranked by its cheapest live price Cheapest Gloves in CS2Every glove model ranked by its cheapest live price