zegoman — CS2 Stats

76561198082502827[U:1:122237099]

1,052Tracked matches37%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.5 DevelopingPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating21,375Pink band · top ~7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#4738 of 12658 tracked
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGzegomanFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER21,375 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim63
Positioning39
Utility44

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD49483Last 10049%Win rateWLLLLLLLLT

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.3
Aggression3.2
Utility4.4
Positioning3.9
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch4.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 79% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 576ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.3
Positioning3.9
Utility4.4
Mechanics7.0
Opening Duels0.1
Win Impact0.6

Composite 4.5/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time568ms−40ms
first ⅓ avg 609ms → last ⅓ avg 568ms
Headshot accuracy16.8%+0.9%
first ⅓ avg 15.9% → last ⅓ avg 16.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.23Best rating — inferno 9–3
132Biggest win — dust2
6Longest win streak
114In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 69% over 13anubisWeakest map · 22% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A23131057%-0.01
nukeD1851328%-0.02
infernoB147750%0.00
mirageS139469%-0.03
ancientS128467%-0.00
cacheB105550%-0.01
anubisD92722%-0.03
vertigo1010%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (22% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

62Matches
48%Win rate
1.19Avg K/D
89.7ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

44%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1450%1.3219.6
Dust21362%1.0915.6
Anubis1164%1.1815.4
Ancient1040%1.0816.9
Cache617%0.9214.3
Inferno333%1.7326.0
Nuke30%1.1822.0
Vertigo2100%1.4523.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.3%Headshot accuracy
32.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.9%Spray accuracy
81.6%Counter-strafing
10.7°Preaim
576msReaction time
27.2%T opening success
30.5%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
3.4%Flash assists
9.97HE damage / grenade
8.09Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.2113% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–90.0512%28 Aug
ancient7–130.0418%27 Aug
inferno6–9-0.0114%27 Aug
anubis3–13-0.0613%27 Aug
vertigo7–9-0.0222%27 Aug
dust210–13-0.0617%27 Aug
cache8–13-0.0516%26 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0217%26 Aug
nuke2–9-0.0916%26 Aug
inferno8–8-0.0120%26 Aug
inferno9–30.2313%26 Aug
dust213–100.0118%26 Aug
ancient13–5-0.046%25 Aug
inferno8–80.0120%25 Aug
inferno6–9-0.1014%25 Aug
anubis1–13-0.0717%25 Aug
nuke5–130.0216%25 Aug
dust23–10-0.0727%24 Aug
inferno7–1-0.0016%24 Aug
nuke1–9-0.1321%24 Aug
dust213–11-0.0320%22 Aug
cache16–14-0.0411%22 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0515%21 Aug
nuke13–50.0116%20 Aug
dust216–19-0.0724%20 Aug
dust210–130.0121%20 Aug
nuke2–13-0.0810%20 Aug
cache14–16-0.0019%20 Aug
dust211–13-0.0029%19 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0417%19 Aug
dust213–80.0519%19 Aug
dust23–13-0.0818%19 Aug
nuke5–9-0.037%19 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0222%19 Aug
dust26–130.0226%19 Aug
nuke4–13-0.0611%18 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0214%18 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0318%18 Aug
cache13–4-0.0221%18 Aug
ancient13–8-0.0315%17 Aug
nuke15–15-0.0222%17 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0211%16 Aug
cache8–13-0.0714%16 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0313%16 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0718%15 Aug
anubis13–10-0.0531%15 Aug
inferno2–9-0.116%9 Aug
mirage0–13-0.119%9 Aug
ancient16–19-0.0018%8 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0519%8 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0315%8 Aug
dust213–11-0.0321%7 Aug
cache13–40.0520%7 Aug
inferno9–00.0717%7 Aug
ancient13–8-0.0024%7 Aug
anubis10–130.0121%7 Aug
dust29–13-0.0911%6 Aug
cache9–130.0316%6 Aug
nuke13–80.0310%6 Aug
mirage16–14-0.0229%6 Aug
nuke9–130.0421%6 Aug
dust213–9-0.0418%6 Aug
dust25–13-0.0516%6 Aug
dust213–3-0.0215%5 Aug
dust29–13-0.0523%5 Aug
dust213–90.0616%5 Aug
dust213–10-0.0331%4 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0417%4 Aug
nuke7–130.0618%4 Aug
cache13–6-0.0215%4 Aug
dust213–70.0927%4 Aug
anubis16–13-0.0115%3 Aug
ancient13–110.0215%3 Aug
dust213–8-0.0313%3 Aug
mirage13–110.0012%3 Aug
anubis13–16-0.0119%3 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0219%3 Aug
mirage16–13-0.0415%3 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0217%3 Aug
ancient13–90.0217%2 Aug
cache8–13-0.0221%1 Aug
ancient4–13-0.0615%31 Jul
nuke13–10-0.0110%31 Jul
inferno13–110.0920%31 Jul
mirage13–100.0610%31 Jul
dust213–20.0710%31 Jul
nuke13–11-0.0515%30 Jul
ancient13–5-0.039%30 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0415%28 Jul
cache13–100.0521%26 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0013%26 Jul
inferno13–10-0.0210%26 Jul
inferno13–11-0.0622%26 Jul
nuke13–80.1322%25 Jul
mirage8–13-0.057%25 Jul
ancient13–40.0720%24 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0314%24 Jul
dust216–120.0021%24 Jul
dust213–80.0322%24 Jul
anubis12–16-0.029%23 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →