Mathias - NEED WATER — CS2 Stats

76561198082408476[U:1:122142748]

471Tracked matches67%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.2 StrongAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating25,491Top 25% of 29,473 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#5291 of 54664 tracked
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMathias - NEED WATERFACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER25,491 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim80
Positioning44
Utility65

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY55405Last 10055%Win rateLWLLWWLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -40pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.0
Aggression7.5
Utility6.5
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels3.1
Clutch10.0

Excellent counter-strafingReliable in 1v1s

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 36 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 590ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0
Positioning4.4
Utility6.5
Mechanics8.5
Opening Duels3.1
Win Impact10.0

Composite 7.2/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time580ms−50ms
first ⅓ avg 629ms → last ⅓ avg 580ms
Headshot accuracy17.6%−2.4%
first ⅓ avg 19.9% → last ⅓ avg 17.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.17Best rating — cache 13–1
131Biggest win — cache
7Longest win streak
126In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 100% over 7infernoWeakest map · 31% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB35161946%0.00
dust2B21111052%0.01
infernoD134931%-0.01
ancientA117464%0.02
anubisS770100%0.01
cacheS54180%0.04
nuke43175%0.03
overpass32167%-0.02
vertigo110100%0.16

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (31% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

292Matches
54%Win rate
1.06Avg K/D
59.6ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

100%1v1 clutch win
67%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage20%0.5810.0
Vertigo10%0.7911.0
Dust210%0.5615.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.7%Headshot accuracy
36.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.3%Spray accuracy
88.2%Counter-strafing
8.3°Preaim
590msReaction time
37.1%T opening success
48.0%CT opening success
0.62Enemies flashed / flash
11.2%Flash assists
9.20HE damage / grenade
9.94Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.138% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

31% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage8–13-0.0412%30 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0413%24 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0514%24 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0517%22 Aug
anubis13–6-0.0223%18 Aug
anubis13–20.0315%17 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0515%11 Aug
mirage2–13-0.018%11 Aug
inferno13–30.0729%11 Aug
anubis13–6-0.0415%28 Jul
cache13–10.1720%28 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0435%27 Jul
cache13–10-0.0119%27 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0613%27 Jul
cache13–8-0.0016%27 Jul
dust213–5-0.0117%27 Jul
dust216–14-0.045%21 Jul
ancient13–80.0425%21 Jul
dust213–11-0.0213%21 Jul
ancient13–4-0.0426%21 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0615%21 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0115%18 Jul
ancient13–100.0227%18 Jul
anubis13–110.0617%17 Jul
mirage13–10.0812%14 Jul
dust211–130.0035%14 Jul
mirage9–130.0133%14 Jul
mirage13–20.1213%14 Jul
mirage3–13-0.045%12 Jul
mirage13–50.0510%12 Jul
dust213–50.0510%12 Jul
dust211–13-0.0022%9 Jul
mirage13–70.1419%9 Jul
cache13–90.0721%8 Jul
cache12–12-0.0121%7 Jul
ancient8–130.068%5 Jul
anubis16–14-0.0213%5 Jul
mirage13–70.0120%4 Jul
mirage10–130.0430%30 Jun
mirage13–11-0.079%30 Jun
dust210–13-0.0324%30 Jun
overpass9–13-0.0429%30 Jun
anubis13–70.0117%23 Jun
mirage10–13-0.0518%23 Jun
dust211–13-0.0122%21 Jun
dust25–4-0.1120%20 Jun
inferno4–13-0.0723%14 Jun
dust213–7-0.0115%14 Jun
mirage13–110.0220%13 Jun
dust213–60.085%7 Jun
mirage5–13-0.0423%7 Jun
inferno13–90.0217%6 Jun
mirage13–80.0617%6 Jun
mirage1–130.0224%31 May
inferno13–11-0.0316%31 May
anubis13–80.0115%31 May
nuke11–1-0.0418%31 May
dust25–130.018%19 May
ancient13–100.0119%19 May
inferno15–15-0.0216%18 May
nuke13–40.0733%17 May
dust211–130.0512%11 May
overpass13–4-0.0927%11 May
mirage4–120.0019%11 May
dust215–150.0115%2 May
dust213–110.0014%2 May
mirage9–130.0227%2 May
dust210–130.0124%26 Apr
inferno8–13-0.0535%26 Apr
inferno4–30.1018%25 Apr
ancient13–100.0130%21 Apr
mirage16–120.0223%20 Apr
mirage11–13-0.0318%20 Apr
inferno3–13-0.0117%19 Apr
mirage6–13-0.0425%19 Apr
dust28–13-0.0325%19 Apr
overpass13–30.0630%14 Apr
mirage6–130.0232%13 Apr
mirage13–30.177%13 Apr
mirage14–16-0.0324%7 Apr
ancient13–40.1426%7 Apr
ancient13–70.0311%28 Mar
mirage13–10.016%28 Mar
dust213–80.0616%28 Mar
dust23–90.0712%24 Mar
mirage9–13-0.0810%22 Mar
mirage13–110.0820%22 Mar
inferno8–13-0.0520%16 Mar
mirage6–13-0.0630%9 Mar
ancient9–13-0.0613%9 Mar
inferno6–130.0214%9 Mar
ancient15–15-0.0013%2 Mar
mirage13–4-0.0418%1 Mar
dust213–80.0520%24 Feb
nuke9–50.1324%24 Feb
inferno8–80.0221%24 Feb
vertigo9–30.1623%24 Feb
ancient13–160.0513%24 Feb
inferno13–16-0.0515%23 Feb
dust213–6-0.0125%23 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →