supergnerd

supergnerd — CS2 Stats

US76561198082001414[U:1:121735686]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

799Tracked matches48%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.0 DevelopingHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating7,017Light Blue band · top ~69.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#26166 of 34677 tracked
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGsupergnerdFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER7,017 · Light Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim70
Positioning47
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY424612Last 10042%Win rateLLTWWWTWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.0
Aggression5.4
Utility5.4
Positioning4.7
Opening Duels1.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 645ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.0
Positioning4.7
Utility5.4
Mechanics7.6
Opening Duels1.4
Win Impact4.4

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time641ms−66ms
first ⅓ avg 706ms → last ⅓ avg 641ms
Headshot accuracy18.9%−3.6%
first ⅓ avg 22.5% → last ⅓ avg 18.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.17Best rating — dust2 8–3
121Biggest win — dust2
4Longest win streak
L2Current streak
88In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 60% over 5anubisWeakest map · 33% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C38162242%0.00
nukeC145936%-0.03
mirageC125742%-0.02
anubisD93633%0.01
infernoC83538%-0.02
ancientC83538%0.01
cacheA53260%0.00
overpass42250%0.01
warden110100%-0.00
vertigo110100%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

8Matches
50%Win rate
0.90Avg K/D
ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

1v1 clutch win
1v2 clutch win
2Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust22100%1.0820.5
Ancient20%0.4215.5
Nuke10%1.2134.0
Anubis1100%0.7319.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.0%Headshot accuracy
34.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.2%Spray accuracy
84.3%Counter-strafing
9.7°Preaim
645msReaction time
32.8%T opening success
38.7%CT opening success
0.63Enemies flashed / flash
6.5%Flash assists
8.69HE damage / grenade
10.74Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.8161% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke8–13-0.1119%18 Aug
inferno1–13-0.0820%18 Aug
dust212–120.0519%5 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0718%5 Aug
dust213–100.0429%3 Aug
cache13–70.0115%3 Aug
mirage12–120.0219%6 Jun
dust28–30.1716%6 Jun
dust211–13-0.0115%5 Jun
cache13–70.0130%5 Jun
cache8–130.0217%18 May
nuke13–11-0.0625%18 May
mirage13–6-0.0111%17 May
cache13–110.0024%17 May
ancient7–13-0.0313%14 May
cache12–12-0.0411%5 May
dust213–100.0122%22 Apr
overpass11–130.0011%11 Mar
dust210–130.0328%11 Mar
anubis16–130.0229%4 Mar
dust26–13-0.0226%4 Mar
nuke5–13-0.0820%2 Mar
mirage13–6-0.0030%2 Mar
anubis4–13-0.037%27 Feb
nuke2–13-0.1114%27 Feb
mirage7–13-0.0118%27 Feb
nuke8–13-0.0721%26 Feb
ancient13–7-0.0213%26 Feb
nuke14–16-0.0418%21 Feb
inferno13–80.016%21 Feb
warden13–11-0.0016%21 Feb
nuke16–120.0621%18 Feb
anubis13–80.0524%18 Feb
dust28–13-0.0315%18 Feb
dust213–80.1526%18 Feb
anubis15–150.0519%17 Feb
anubis13–160.0210%17 Feb
dust213–5-0.0029%17 Feb
inferno9–13-0.0415%17 Feb
ancient13–110.0121%17 Feb
overpass13–11-0.0122%17 Feb
inferno13–8-0.0114%17 Feb
nuke3–13-0.0111%16 Feb
dust212–120.0118%16 Feb
anubis14–16-0.0312%16 Feb
inferno13–50.0210%16 Feb
nuke13–80.0123%7 Feb
anubis10–13-0.0324%7 Feb
ancient13–50.1316%7 Feb
overpass13–30.0715%5 Feb
inferno6–130.0515%5 Feb
nuke13–7-0.0321%5 Feb
ancient10–130.0115%5 Feb
dust25–13-0.1019%4 Feb
anubis13–60.0537%4 Feb
dust25–13-0.0264%3 Feb
nuke2–13-0.0413%2 Feb
dust27–13-0.1120%2 Feb
dust212–120.0116%29 Jan
dust29–13-0.0035%29 Jan
inferno10–13-0.0360%29 Jan
mirage7–12-0.0330%28 Jan
dust213–50.0120%28 Jan
mirage13–11-0.0122%23 Jan
dust213–40.0420%23 Jan
anubis12–120.0224%23 Jan
mirage12–12-0.0326%15 Jan
dust28–13-0.0328%15 Jan
mirage12–12-0.0517%14 Jan
ancient11–13-0.0218%14 Jan
nuke9–13-0.0410%14 Jan
dust213–9-0.0111%14 Jan
mirage12–120.0418%11 Jan
dust26–13-0.0228%11 Jan
inferno10–13-0.0729%11 Jan
dust213–9-0.0121%5 Jan
mirage13–5-0.0327%4 Jan
dust211–13-0.0128%4 Jan
nuke12–120.0323%20 Dec
dust26–13-0.0239%20 Dec
mirage11–13-0.0923%18 Dec
dust213–70.0534%11 Dec
dust26–130.0124%11 Dec
vertigo13–6-0.0622%4 Dec
dust28–130.0225%4 Dec
dust213–10-0.0234%3 Dec
nuke13–100.0221%3 Dec
dust27–13-0.0514%3 Dec
dust212–10.0326%3 Dec
ancient2–13-0.0712%22 Nov
dust213–70.0040%22 Nov
dust29–13-0.0923%22 Nov
dust213–70.0520%21 Nov
dust25–13-0.0318%21 Nov
dust211–13-0.0420%20 Nov
dust27–13-0.0120%20 Nov
dust213–110.0122%15 Nov
ancient12–120.0719%4 Nov
dust213–110.0419%17 Aug
overpass8–13-0.0011%17 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →