Obesemaurice

Obesemaurice — CS2 Stats

76561198080052248[U:1:119786520]Steam profile ↗

2,034Tracked matches46%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.1 DevelopingHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating16,928Purple band · top ~20.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#10428 of 17952 tracked
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,149 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGObesemauriceFACEITLevel 5 · 1,149 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER16,928 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim61
Positioning54
Utility46

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD40582Last 10040%Win rateLLLTLWWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.1
Aggression7.1
Utility4.6
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels2.7
Clutch4.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 51% on CT to 31% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.1
Positioning5.4
Utility4.6
Mechanics5.7
Opening Duels2.7
Win Impact3.8

Composite 5.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time549ms−32ms
first ⅓ avg 582ms → last ⅓ avg 549ms
Headshot accuracy15.6%+0.6%
first ⅓ avg 15.0% → last ⅓ avg 15.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — mirage 13–7
131Biggest win — dust2
4Longest win streak
L3Current streak
119In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 62% over 21mirageWeakest map · 28% over 18
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA2113862%0.01
mirageD1851328%0.02
dust2D1651131%-0.00
anubisD1651131%-0.01
ancientD134931%0.01
cacheC94544%0.01
nukeA74357%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (28% over 18). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,362Matches
50%Win rate
1.00Avg K/D
72.0ADR
36%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
28%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage3253%1.0014.8
Inferno2556%1.2017.2
Dust21533%0.7812.7
Nuke1464%0.9714.6
Ancient1145%0.9215.0
Anubis1145%0.8112.7
Train540%1.0914.4
Overpass250%0.9817.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.6%Headshot accuracy
33.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.1%Spray accuracy
75.6%Counter-strafing
10.5°Preaim
549msReaction time
30.7%T opening success
51.1%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
3.4%Flash assists
14.00HE damage / grenade
6.11Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.6619% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

28% win rate across 18 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust29–130.0515%28 Aug
dust24–13-0.0317%28 Aug
inferno11–130.0113%28 Aug
ancient15–150.0221%28 Aug
inferno10–130.0222%28 Aug
anubis13–90.0313%28 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0111%27 Aug
ancient2–13-0.0717%26 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0117%26 Aug
dust216–12-0.0213%26 Aug
ancient13–40.109%26 Aug
dust210–130.0110%25 Aug
nuke13–90.0114%25 Aug
ancient13–30.0513%25 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0314%25 Aug
dust213–10.0721%25 Aug
inferno13–110.0218%25 Aug
ancient7–130.018%24 Aug
dust26–13-0.0413%24 Aug
anubis1–13-0.058%24 Aug
dust213–11-0.0615%24 Aug
nuke4–130.0124%24 Aug
inferno7–130.0112%24 Aug
mirage1–13-0.0419%24 Aug
mirage15–15-0.0320%24 Aug
anubis16–140.018%22 Aug
ancient13–60.0519%8 Aug
nuke13–7-0.0511%8 Aug
cache14–16-0.0429%8 Aug
inferno13–50.0218%6 Aug
dust26–130.0220%6 Aug
anubis13–110.0015%5 Aug
mirage13–80.0617%5 Aug
dust24–13-0.0517%5 Aug
mirage9–13-0.009%5 Aug
dust211–13-0.0314%5 Aug
mirage2–11-0.0514%5 Aug
dust25–13-0.0423%5 Aug
mirage13–110.0311%5 Aug
inferno13–8-0.0510%5 Aug
cache13–100.019%5 Aug
inferno10–130.0233%5 Aug
inferno13–60.0511%5 Aug
cache13–50.0713%4 Aug
mirage13–70.1114%4 Aug
cache10–130.0120%4 Aug
ancient14–160.088%3 Aug
cache13–10-0.0315%3 Aug
inferno13–100.0216%3 Aug
mirage9–130.0221%3 Aug
anubis13–90.0121%3 Aug
dust216–130.0416%3 Aug
inferno13–110.027%3 Aug
anubis13–90.0413%31 Jul
nuke9–13-0.048%31 Jul
inferno13–30.0416%31 Jul
nuke4–130.0216%31 Jul
ancient8–130.0014%30 Jul
inferno13–80.0612%30 Jul
cache13–30.1110%30 Jul
cache7–130.0113%29 Jul
inferno13–100.0713%29 Jul
inferno13–60.0316%29 Jul
inferno5–130.0615%29 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0016%29 Jul
mirage4–130.0515%28 Jul
mirage7–130.0018%28 Jul
anubis13–16-0.0513%28 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0818%28 Jul
ancient11–13-0.015%28 Jul
ancient3–13-0.0713%27 Jul
anubis9–130.0010%27 Jul
inferno16–140.0114%22 Jul
anubis14–16-0.0215%22 Jul
inferno13–11-0.0316%22 Jul
anubis2–13-0.0124%22 Jul
mirage10–130.0624%22 Jul
mirage13–80.0512%22 Jul
dust24–130.0015%22 Jul
anubis3–13-0.0716%22 Jul
nuke13–110.0116%21 Jul
nuke16–140.0216%21 Jul
mirage13–160.0317%21 Jul
mirage13–70.1413%21 Jul
cache9–130.0024%21 Jul
dust29–130.0111%21 Jul
ancient13–7-0.045%21 Jul
mirage13–160.0017%20 Jul
inferno6–130.0111%20 Jul
anubis10–13-0.038%20 Jul
inferno2–13-0.1029%20 Jul
dust213–70.0314%20 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0310%20 Jul
dust26–13-0.0213%19 Jul
cache10–13-0.0625%19 Jul
mirage11–130.0112%19 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0615%18 Jul
anubis8–130.0215%18 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0416%17 Jul
anubis11–130.0315%16 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →