EstroKisut

EstroKisut — CS2 Stats

76561198078847526[U:1:118581798]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,110Tracked matches52%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.7 Developing
Premier CS Rating19,652Purple band · top ~9.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#14946 of 35031 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,611 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

19,652Peak Premier on CSDB
1,611Peak Faceit ELO on CSDB
1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,611
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 140 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 19,652
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 348 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGEstroKisutFACEITLevel 8 · 1,611 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER19,652 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,611csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim50
Positioning40
Utility69

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD49474Last 10049%Win rateWLLLWLLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -40pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.0
Aggression5.1
Utility6.9
Positioning4.0
Opening Duels1.1

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 608ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 69% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.0
Positioning4.0
Utility6.9
Mechanics4.3
Opening Duels1.4
Win Impact5.6

Composite 4.7/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time623ms+5ms
first ⅓ avg 617ms → last ⅓ avg 623ms
Headshot accuracy20.1%+0.7%
first ⅓ avg 19.4% → last ⅓ avg 20.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — anubis 9–13
131Biggest win — dust2
5Longest win streak
65In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 67% over 9anubisWeakest map · 41% over 17
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB23111248%-0.01
dust2A22121055%-0.01
anubisC1771041%0.01
cacheA169756%0.00
ancientS96367%0.00
nukeC73443%-0.03
inferno4040%0.01
vertigo110100%0.05
office1010%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (41% over 17). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.0%Headshot accuracy
32.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.1%Spray accuracy
69.5%Counter-strafing
11.6°Preaim
608msReaction time
27.4%T opening success
41.2%CT opening success
0.68Enemies flashed / flash
8.5%Flash assists
11.36HE damage / grenade
13.63Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.3933% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

41% win rate across 17 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis16–120.0218%29 Aug
anubis11–130.0521%28 Aug
cache8–13-0.0417%28 Aug
cache3–13-0.0124%26 Aug
cache13–100.0733%26 Aug
dust25–13-0.067%22 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0410%22 Aug
dust213–70.0823%22 Aug
dust210–13-0.0415%22 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0415%21 Aug
dust211–13-0.0318%21 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0122%21 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0730%21 Aug
nuke13–110.0218%20 Aug
dust215–15-0.0617%19 Aug
dust213–80.0034%19 Aug
ancient13–110.0615%14 Aug
dust213–80.0226%11 Aug
anubis13–90.0921%7 Aug
dust216–120.0127%7 Aug
inferno7–130.0118%5 Aug
mirage13–50.0817%2 Aug
vertigo13–80.0517%29 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0422%26 Jul
dust26–13-0.0320%26 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0726%26 Jul
nuke13–5-0.0319%26 Jul
dust213–6-0.0124%25 Jul
dust23–13-0.0511%25 Jul
mirage13–70.0214%25 Jul
cache13–6-0.0032%25 Jul
dust213–10-0.0713%25 Jul
cache7–13-0.0819%25 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0319%24 Jul
inferno11–130.0220%24 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0225%24 Jul
mirage13–80.0121%24 Jul
mirage13–90.0518%24 Jul
dust213–9-0.0629%24 Jul
ancient19–22-0.0120%23 Jul
ancient13–20.0320%23 Jul
mirage8–130.028%23 Jul
nuke6–13-0.0322%23 Jul
anubis13–40.0221%23 Jul
mirage2–13-0.0329%23 Jul
dust25–00.047%23 Jul
dust213–1-0.0319%23 Jul
mirage17–19-0.0211%22 Jul
dust25–13-0.0223%22 Jul
cache13–40.0921%22 Jul
anubis5–130.0216%22 Jul
anubis0–13-0.110%22 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0817%22 Jul
cache13–80.0015%22 Jul
anubis9–130.1316%22 Jul
anubis6–13-0.017%22 Jul
dust213–8-0.0115%21 Jul
anubis13–90.0010%21 Jul
cache8–130.0518%21 Jul
ancient13–50.0218%21 Jul
cache15–15-0.0317%21 Jul
mirage9–13-0.019%20 Jul
cache13–100.0515%15 Jul
nuke13–11-0.0314%15 Jul
dust213–80.048%15 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0314%15 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0516%15 Jul
dust213–100.0317%15 Jul
anubis13–8-0.0218%14 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0610%14 Jul
anubis13–10-0.0313%14 Jul
mirage13–100.0313%14 Jul
ancient1–13-0.0850%14 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0118%14 Jul
anubis13–80.0215%13 Jul
mirage6–130.0514%13 Jul
dust210–130.0231%13 Jul
anubis15–15-0.027%13 Jul
cache6–13-0.0037%13 Jul
inferno15–15-0.0419%13 Jul
ancient9–20.0229%13 Jul
cache11–13-0.0818%13 Jul
inferno9–130.0423%13 Jul
mirage13–30.0417%13 Jul
cache13–11-0.0520%12 Jul
dust28–13-0.0331%12 Jul
cache13–90.0218%9 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0323%9 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0521%9 Jul
office10–130.0222%9 Jul
ancient13–90.0018%6 Jul
mirage16–140.0122%6 Jul
dust23–130.0117%3 Jul
ancient13–6-0.0110%3 Jul
anubis8–130.0322%3 Jul
cache13–50.0214%3 Jul
mirage8–130.0412%2 Jul
nuke5–13-0.0316%2 Jul
cache13–20.028%2 Jul
anubis13–160.0418%30 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →