IceEyes

IceEyes — CS2 Stats

76561198078349506[U:1:118083778]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

938Tracked matches67%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidHybrid Rifler
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,073 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGIceEyesFACEITLevel 7 · 1,073 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim66
Positioning58
Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51472Last 10051%Win rateWLLLLLWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -50pp win rate · -0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.6
Aggression7.2
Utility5.9
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels2.5
Clutch3.4

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.76 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 50% on CT to 30% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 617ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.6
Positioning5.8
Utility5.9
Mechanics7.6
Opening Duels2.5
Win Impact10.0

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time625ms−39ms
first ⅓ avg 664ms → last ⅓ avg 625ms
Headshot accuracy18.4%−3.9%
first ⅓ avg 22.3% → last ⅓ avg 18.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.12Best rating — mirage 13–0
130Biggest win — mirage
7Longest win streak
58In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
2Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 80% over 5mirageWeakest map · 41% over 27
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC27111641%-0.01
infernoC23101343%-0.02
nukeA169756%-0.00
dust2B158753%-0.01
overpassA85363%-0.01
cacheS54180%0.01
ancientA53260%-0.02
anubis110100%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (41% over 27). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

358Matches
52%Win rate
1.09Avg K/D
79.1ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno9462%1.1715.6
Mirage7949%1.0415.8
Dust27540%1.0715.7
Ancient6148%1.0715.0
Nuke2756%0.9815.2
Anubis1040%0.9013.7
Train367%1.1017.3
Cache3100%1.5313.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.8%Headshot accuracy
34.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.3%Spray accuracy
84.0%Counter-strafing
10.7°Preaim
617msReaction time
30.0%T opening success
50.0%CT opening success
0.76Enemies flashed / flash
5.1%Flash assists
6.98HE damage / grenade
10.32Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 29.9808% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

41% win rate across 27 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–7-0.0111%15 Jul
nuke10–130.0513%15 Jul
mirage9–130.0013%14 Jul
mirage10–13-0.097%11 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0823%8 Jul
nuke5–13-0.0526%21 Jun
overpass13–80.0012%15 Jun
inferno11–13-0.0018%14 Jun
overpass13–30.0311%14 Jun
mirage13–6-0.0015%14 Jun
mirage13–00.1230%14 Jun
mirage13–9-0.0213%14 Jun
cache13–60.0520%12 Jun
mirage13–70.0237%10 Jun
dust213–110.0220%10 Jun
mirage16–19-0.0111%8 Jun
nuke13–50.0632%8 Jun
inferno13–100.026%7 Jun
nuke13–10-0.0220%7 Jun
inferno13–80.0315%6 Jun
ancient13–30.0016%6 Jun
ancient13–8-0.0220%6 Jun
cache13–10.0439%5 Jun
mirage10–130.0311%5 Jun
mirage7–130.019%3 Jun
nuke13–00.1018%3 Jun
nuke13–6-0.047%2 Jun
inferno13–80.017%2 Jun
dust213–110.0323%2 Jun
dust28–13-0.0221%1 Jun
overpass13–10.0334%31 May
mirage13–30.0323%31 May
inferno13–100.0227%31 May
overpass13–9-0.0115%31 May
mirage13–80.0212%30 May
mirage4–13-0.0511%30 May
inferno5–13-0.1016%30 May
mirage8–13-0.0916%29 May
inferno13–7-0.0212%29 May
inferno6–13-0.0710%26 May
nuke13–90.0115%25 May
inferno7–130.0114%25 May
overpass16–14-0.0117%24 May
dust213–80.0118%24 May
dust21–6-0.130%24 May
nuke1–13-0.0223%24 May
inferno9–13-0.039%23 May
mirage2–13-0.088%23 May
inferno13–9-0.0224%22 May
ancient3–13-0.0528%22 May
mirage13–10-0.069%19 May
overpass2–13-0.0118%19 May
mirage13–20.0522%19 May
overpass9–130.0215%18 May
inferno3–13-0.0422%18 May
nuke5–70.0019%17 May
mirage8–13-0.0721%16 May
nuke13–4-0.0717%16 May
mirage11–13-0.0523%16 May
ancient13–110.0219%16 May
mirage6–13-0.0630%15 May
inferno13–10-0.0314%15 May
nuke8–13-0.0413%15 May
inferno12–120.0423%15 May
dust28–13-0.0422%15 May
mirage13–10.0822%15 May
overpass8–13-0.0910%14 May
nuke11–13-0.0516%14 May
inferno13–3-0.0021%14 May
dust212–120.0221%14 May
inferno10–13-0.0347%14 May
mirage11–13-0.0215%14 May
ancient10–13-0.0619%13 May
dust213–100.0421%13 May
dust24–00.0030%13 May
mirage10–13-0.0128%13 May
cache11–13-0.0328%13 May
inferno13–8-0.0314%13 May
dust21–9-0.0219%13 May
mirage13–10.0317%12 May
nuke13–110.0118%12 May
inferno6–130.0124%12 May
dust213–100.0122%12 May
nuke13–5-0.0142%12 May
inferno5–13-0.058%12 May
dust213–20.0322%11 May
inferno10–13-0.0421%11 May
dust28–13-0.038%11 May
mirage13–60.0721%11 May
cache13–10-0.0316%11 May
inferno3–13-0.0613%11 May
dust213–20.0118%11 May
nuke11–130.0324%10 May
mirage10–13-0.0123%10 May
anubis13–10-0.0432%10 May
inferno13–6-0.0218%10 May
nuke13–100.0028%10 May
dust211–13-0.0218%10 May
mirage3–130.0235%9 May
inferno2–13-0.0229%9 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →