Nic — CS2 Stats

76561198076791666[U:1:116525938]

3,511Tracked matches55%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.4 DevelopingSupport
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGNicFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim33
Positioning46
Utility71

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52444Last 10052%Win rateWWWWWLLTLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution leads the profile while opening activity stays low.

Aim3.3
Aggression5.0
Utility7.1
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels1.2
Clutch4.8

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 43% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 633ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 66% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim3.3
Positioning4.6
Utility7.1
Mechanics3.6
Opening Duels1.7
Win Impact6.7

Composite 4.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time635ms−24ms
first ⅓ avg 659ms → last ⅓ avg 635ms
Headshot accuracy15.9%+0.7%
first ⅓ avg 15.1% → last ⅓ avg 15.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — dust2 13–4
131Biggest win — nuke
5Longest win streak
W5Current streak
65In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 77% over 13mirageWeakest map · 25% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB30151550%0.01
nukeS1812667%0.00
dust2S1310377%0.01
mirageD123925%-0.01
overpassD124833%0.00
cacheC52340%-0.01
anubisA53260%-0.00
ancient32167%0.03
train1010%-0.02
vertigo110100%0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

28Matches
57%Win rate
0.54Avg K/D
54.5ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

44%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis838%0.5810.5
Mirage757%0.478.4
Dust2450%0.616.0
Inferno367%0.5911.7
Ancient3100%0.4810.3
Nuke10%0.3311.0
Train1100%0.829.0
Vertigo1100%0.315.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.5%Headshot accuracy
28.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
28.1%Spray accuracy
66.2%Counter-strafing
10.7°Preaim
633msReaction time
26.3%T opening success
43.4%CT opening success
0.75Enemies flashed / flash
10.7%Flash assists
9.34HE damage / grenade
16.14Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 26.3259% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–9-0.0614%28 Aug
nuke13–10.0715%28 Aug
dust213–100.0613%28 Aug
inferno13–70.0210%25 Aug
dust213–6-0.0213%25 Aug
mirage4–13-0.079%25 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0215%18 Aug
cache15–15-0.0112%18 Aug
dust28–13-0.0316%18 Aug
inferno10–130.0523%18 Aug
cache7–13-0.0322%19 Jul
cache1–13-0.0325%19 Jul
cache13–11-0.0424%17 Jul
inferno13–110.0716%17 Jul
nuke7–13-0.0412%17 Jul
train2–13-0.0223%17 Jul
mirage10–13-0.1114%13 Jul
dust213–60.0613%13 Jul
overpass6–13-0.0111%4 Jul
ancient8–30.067%4 Jul
inferno13–80.0715%4 Jul
nuke13–40.0416%4 Jul
nuke13–110.0427%29 May
mirage6–130.0116%28 May
inferno13–9-0.0217%25 May
overpass5–13-0.0228%24 May
nuke3–13-0.0811%22 May
inferno13–30.0513%22 May
nuke16–13-0.0226%21 May
anubis13–3-0.018%21 May
overpass13–80.0314%21 May
mirage13–100.0312%21 May
nuke8–130.0114%17 May
inferno6–13-0.0314%17 May
dust213–9-0.0315%17 May
overpass4–13-0.079%17 May
overpass14–160.0118%14 May
inferno15–15-0.0310%14 May
mirage7–130.0424%14 May
overpass13–40.1018%12 May
overpass5–13-0.0314%12 May
vertigo13–100.0719%11 May
anubis1–130.0217%11 May
dust213–60.0416%10 May
inferno13–80.0113%10 May
inferno16–13-0.0110%9 May
cache13–50.0615%9 May
inferno7–130.0525%6 May
dust213–11-0.0511%6 May
inferno13–16-0.0113%30 Apr
anubis13–90.0514%30 Apr
inferno13–8-0.0210%28 Apr
dust29–13-0.0428%28 Apr
mirage6–13-0.0414%28 Apr
nuke13–7-0.0018%27 Apr
nuke13–6-0.018%27 Apr
ancient10–13-0.0216%26 Apr
inferno9–13-0.0915%26 Apr
anubis4–13-0.0316%23 Apr
nuke13–10.137%23 Apr
inferno2–13-0.0310%23 Apr
nuke13–80.0119%21 Apr
inferno13–80.0620%20 Apr
inferno15–150.0216%19 Apr
nuke13–4-0.0521%19 Apr
mirage6–13-0.0211%19 Apr
inferno11–130.0121%18 Apr
overpass11–13-0.0121%18 Apr
nuke13–40.0425%18 Apr
inferno9–130.0312%18 Apr
nuke4–13-0.0719%18 Apr
nuke4–13-0.0712%18 Apr
inferno13–110.0214%18 Apr
dust213–70.0315%14 Apr
nuke13–20.0219%14 Apr
inferno13–50.0817%13 Apr
mirage13–6-0.0118%12 Apr
inferno10–13-0.0614%11 Apr
overpass13–100.1117%11 Apr
inferno13–80.0514%10 Apr
dust23–13-0.0714%10 Apr
dust213–10.0521%6 Apr
mirage7–13-0.0222%6 Apr
inferno9–13-0.0613%6 Apr
dust213–40.1420%5 Apr
ancient13–90.0614%5 Apr
inferno11–13-0.019%5 Apr
mirage9–13-0.0012%5 Apr
inferno10–130.0410%5 Apr
overpass16–13-0.0613%5 Apr
dust213–40.029%4 Apr
anubis13–10-0.0521%4 Apr
inferno10–130.0113%3 Apr
overpass15–15-0.0311%2 Apr
nuke6–130.016%2 Apr
nuke13–11-0.0114%29 Mar
mirage13–40.0515%29 Mar
inferno13–80.0323%29 Mar
inferno13–80.0110%29 Mar
overpass11–130.0113%24 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →