Notorious J.I.D — CS2 Stats

76561198075871912[U:1:115606184]

405Tracked matches55%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.2 DevelopingHybrid Rifler

Premier CS Rating14,892Blue band · top ~29% of ranked players (population est.)

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim63

Positioning57

Utility37

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52–43–5Last 10052%Win rateLWLWWWLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.3

Aggression4.8

Utility3.7

Positioning5.7

Opening Duels2.0

Clutch4.0

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 53% on CT to 23% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 592ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.3

Positioning5.7

Utility3.7

Mechanics6.4

Opening Duels2.8

Win Impact6.7

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time597ms−46ms

first ⅓ avg 643ms → last ⅓ avg 597ms

Headshot accuracy20.5%+1.6%

first ⅓ avg 18.9% → last ⅓ avg 20.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — dust2 13–4

13–1Biggest win — inferno

7Longest win streak

10–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

8Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 67% over 12cacheWeakest map · 27% over 11

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	C	19	8–11	42%	-0.01
dust2	A	15	9–6	60%	0.03
nuke	A	15	9–6	60%	0.01
ancient	B	15	7–8	47%	0.00
inferno	S	12	8–4	67%	0.02
cache	D	11	3–8	27%	-0.01
anubis	B	8	4–4	50%	-0.02
vertigo	—	3	2–1	67%	-0.02
train	—	1	1–0	100%	0.02
overpass	—	1	1–0	100%	0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

22Matches

50%Win rate

0.93Avg K/D

66.7ADR

45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win

7%1v2 clutch win

4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Dust2	8	50%	0.90	13.5
Mirage	4	75%	1.27	13.3
Anubis	3	33%	0.81	8.0
Cache	2	0%	0.90	12.0
Ancient	2	50%	0.56	11.0
Nuke	2	50%	0.98	12.5
Inferno	1	100%	0.82	9.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.9%Headshot accuracy

35.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

33.9%Spray accuracy

78.8%Counter-strafing

11.5°Preaim

592msReaction time

23.2%T opening success

52.8%CT opening success

0.41Enemies flashed / flash

8.8%Flash assists

8.76HE damage / grenade

4.75Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4094 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 23.2377% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	9–13	0.08	16%	28 Aug →
nuke	13–8	-0.00	18%	28 Aug →
ancient	9–13	-0.01	30%	27 Aug →
mirage	13–3	0.02	6%	27 Aug →
nuke	13–3	0.10	21%	27 Aug →
cache	13–7	-0.02	18%	26 Aug →
inferno	10–13	0.02	27%	26 Aug →
nuke	13–10	-0.03	15%	25 Aug →
cache	11–13	-0.05	22%	25 Aug →
dust2	13–5	0.02	21%	24 Aug →
inferno	13–7	-0.02	15%	24 Aug →
inferno	13–8	0.07	29%	24 Aug →
anubis	13–11	-0.03	67%	24 Aug →
nuke	4–13	-0.02	16%	23 Aug →
dust2	12–12	0.03	25%	23 Aug →
dust2	9–13	0.03	20%	22 Aug →
cache	9–13	0.08	21%	22 Aug →
inferno	10–13	-0.00	15%	20 Aug →
mirage	4–13	0.02	23%	20 Aug →
ancient	4–13	-0.00	19%	20 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.05	17%	19 Aug →
inferno	13–1	0.00	28%	18 Aug →
anubis	13–8	-0.03	20%	18 Aug →
nuke	10–13	-0.05	14%	17 Aug →
nuke	16–13	-0.03	14%	17 Aug →
ancient	13–4	-0.03	11%	17 Aug →
ancient	13–10	0.06	16%	17 Aug →
ancient	13–11	0.13	14%	17 Aug →
nuke	10–13	0.01	20%	16 Aug →
nuke	13–10	0.01	12%	16 Aug →
cache	5–13	-0.04	15%	15 Aug →
inferno	13–6	-0.02	19%	15 Aug →
cache	8–13	-0.05	31%	15 Aug →
anubis	2–13	-0.06	5%	14 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.10	11%	13 Aug →
dust2	9–13	0.01	19%	13 Aug →
ancient	14–16	0.02	15%	13 Aug →
mirage	7–13	-0.03	16%	13 Aug →
ancient	13–2	0.00	14%	13 Aug →
dust2	13–11	-0.03	15%	12 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.05	16%	12 Aug →
cache	3–13	0.03	13%	12 Aug →
ancient	16–14	0.04	8%	12 Aug →
mirage	13–3	-0.06	27%	11 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.01	18%	11 Aug →
ancient	4–13	-0.12	12%	11 Aug →
ancient	7–13	0.00	15%	9 Aug →
ancient	13–6	-0.00	13%	9 Aug →
anubis	6–13	-0.03	25%	8 Aug →
ancient	12–12	-0.01	8%	8 Aug →
ancient	13–1	0.03	23%	7 Aug →
dust2	7–3	0.10	21%	7 Aug →
nuke	16–14	0.05	25%	7 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.08	15%	7 Aug →
nuke	15–15	-0.04	16%	6 Aug →
ancient	11–13	-0.07	5%	6 Aug →
inferno	13–3	0.05	7%	6 Aug →
nuke	13–11	-0.02	8%	4 Aug →
mirage	7–13	0.01	36%	4 Aug →
vertigo	11–3	-0.07	5%	3 Aug →
cache	13–11	0.02	22%	3 Aug →
mirage	6–13	0.05	17%	3 Aug →
cache	5–13	-0.01	20%	1 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.08	31%	1 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.01	18%	31 Jul →
nuke	8–13	0.02	18%	30 Jul →
cache	11–13	-0.03	22%	30 Jul →
anubis	4–13	-0.01	17%	30 Jul →
vertigo	11–13	-0.02	18%	29 Jul →
dust2	13–7	-0.05	16%	29 Jul →
mirage	4–13	-0.03	17%	29 Jul →
train	13–8	0.02	30%	28 Jul →
dust2	13–4	0.14	19%	28 Jul →
inferno	13–5	0.10	30%	28 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.04	13%	28 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.12	20%	28 Jul →
inferno	13–10	-0.01	30%	26 Jul →
overpass	13–6	0.03	35%	26 Jul →
nuke	12–12	0.06	10%	26 Jul →
inferno	8–13	0.02	20%	25 Jul →
mirage	13–10	-0.04	7%	25 Jul →
dust2	15–15	0.03	15%	24 Jul →
anubis	13–6	-0.00	14%	24 Jul →
mirage	7–13	0.00	16%	23 Jul →
dust2	16–13	0.02	15%	23 Jul →
anubis	13–11	0.02	21%	23 Jul →
mirage	13–7	-0.01	15%	22 Jul →
dust2	13–4	-0.01	13%	22 Jul →
dust2	13–3	0.05	24%	22 Jul →
anubis	3–13	-0.00	21%	22 Jul →
ancient	14–16	-0.04	15%	22 Jul →
nuke	13–5	0.05	15%	20 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.07	28%	20 Jul →
inferno	13–9	-0.01	17%	20 Jul →
nuke	13–11	0.03	13%	20 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.03	44%	19 Jul →
cache	3–13	-0.01	15%	19 Jul →
vertigo	13–8	0.02	12%	18 Jul →
inferno	9–13	0.03	18%	18 Jul →
cache	13–3	-0.06	11%	18 Jul →