Tirates — CS2 Stats

76561198075512038[U:1:115246310]✓ No bans

2,638Tracked matches52%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.2 StrongAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating26,595Top 10% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#1702 of 27701 tracked
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanThe Global Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGTiratesFACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER26,595 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88
Positioning58
Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD504010Last 10050%Win rateLTTLWTLLTL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -50pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.8
Aggression9.0
Utility5.9
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels4.6
Clutch1.4

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

donk

Plays most like donk 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.9° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 30 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 57% on CT to 39% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 554ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8
Positioning5.8
Utility5.9
Mechanics7.8
Opening Duels4.6
Win Impact5.7

Composite 7.2/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time565ms−58ms
first ⅓ avg 623ms → last ⅓ avg 565ms
Headshot accuracy18.4%−1.4%
first ⅓ avg 19.7% → last ⅓ avg 18.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.20Best rating — cache 13–9
131Biggest win — cache
4Longest win streak
56In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 100% over 6nukeWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheB51232845%0.02
mirageB126650%0.00
ancientD72529%-0.01
dust2S75271%0.02
anubisA74357%0.03
infernoS660100%0.00
nukeD51420%0.01
fachwerk21150%0.07
vertigo110100%0.01
shelter110100%0.11
boulder1010%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

271Matches
55%Win rate
1.18Avg K/D
80.8ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

27%1v1 clutch win
30%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage3468%1.2719.2
Anubis2250%1.0715.4
Ancient1729%1.0216.5
Nuke1464%1.3517.8
Inferno1436%1.0113.8
Dust21369%1.0516.1
Cache650%1.5122.0
Vertigo667%1.0917.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.3%Headshot accuracy
41.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
48.4%Spray accuracy
85.2%Counter-strafing
10.9°Preaim
554msReaction time
39.4%T opening success
57.2%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
7.1%Flash assists
7.96HE damage / grenade
11.73Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.3987% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache7–13-0.0118%29 Aug
cache12–120.0630%29 Aug
cache12–12-0.0913%27 Aug
ancient2–13-0.1014%27 Aug
cache13–20.018%26 Aug
cache12–120.0212%26 Aug
cache10–130.0526%26 Aug
cache1–13-0.0113%26 Aug
nuke12–120.1224%26 Aug
cache3–130.0615%26 Aug
cache6–13-0.0128%26 Aug
mirage7–13-0.057%25 Aug
inferno13–7-0.0126%25 Aug
mirage13–70.0927%25 Aug
cache13–40.0717%25 Aug
cache8–130.0029%24 Aug
cache12–120.0528%24 Aug
dust219–16-0.0125%24 Aug
inferno13–20.0617%23 Aug
cache13–9-0.0229%23 Aug
mirage15–19-0.0310%17 Aug
vertigo16–120.0120%17 Aug
cache13–110.0119%17 Aug
ancient10–130.0214%16 Aug
cache13–80.0819%16 Aug
dust213–9-0.0122%16 Aug
cache13–6-0.0113%15 Aug
mirage0–2-0.010%14 Aug
inferno16–120.0117%14 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0110%12 Aug
mirage13–70.0222%11 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0324%10 Aug
mirage13–40.069%10 Aug
cache13–40.0413%9 Aug
dust27–13-0.0822%9 Aug
ancient10–130.0212%8 Aug
inferno13–7-0.0421%8 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0216%8 Aug
dust212–120.0413%7 Aug
anubis13–110.009%6 Aug
anubis13–80.0317%6 Aug
dust216–130.0415%5 Aug
cache8–130.0316%3 Aug
cache5–13-0.0613%3 Aug
cache13–70.0622%2 Aug
cache13–8-0.0213%1 Aug
cache10–40.0221%1 Aug
cache13–40.0927%31 Jul
cache0–9-0.0250%31 Jul
cache13–4-0.0035%31 Jul
cache12–120.0620%31 Jul
cache12–120.0122%30 Jul
cache11–13-0.0015%29 Jul
anubis13–60.0225%28 Jul
anubis5–130.0224%28 Jul
cache10–13-0.0232%27 Jul
cache13–6-0.0613%27 Jul
cache4–13-0.0227%27 Jul
cache13–10-0.0117%27 Jul
cache13–90.2018%25 Jul
cache11–13-0.0122%24 Jul
cache13–100.0526%24 Jul
nuke4–13-0.0624%24 Jul
nuke13–6-0.0522%23 Jul
cache11–130.1514%23 Jul
inferno13–11-0.0213%23 Jul
ancient13–40.0124%23 Jul
ancient8–130.0318%23 Jul
cache13–80.0020%23 Jul
nuke9–130.0413%23 Jul
cache13–90.0624%22 Jul
cache8–13-0.0119%22 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0220%22 Jul
cache13–7-0.0119%22 Jul
cache3–13-0.0713%22 Jul
cache1–13-0.0018%20 Jul
cache13–40.1922%20 Jul
shelter13–70.1116%20 Jul
dust213–60.0732%20 Jul
nuke11–13-0.0017%20 Jul
anubis4–130.0220%19 Jul
mirage13–60.0117%19 Jul
dust213–110.0821%19 Jul
fachwerk13–50.1223%19 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0117%18 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0729%18 Jul
inferno13–60.0117%18 Jul
cache1–13-0.0333%17 Jul
anubis10–130.1618%17 Jul
mirage13–60.079%16 Jul
cache4–13-0.0319%16 Jul
cache12–120.0523%15 Jul
cache13–10.0720%15 Jul
anubis13–8-0.0018%14 Jul
fachwerk9–130.0211%14 Jul
cache7–130.1225%13 Jul
cache3–9-0.0431%13 Jul
cache13–70.0015%13 Jul
cache13–90.0119%12 Jul
boulder12–12-0.0412%12 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →