Laff

Laff — CS2 Stats

US76561198074625557[U:1:114359829]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,229Tracked matches45%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating18,593Purple band · top ~14.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#5147 of 9689 tracked
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGLaffFACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER18,593 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim77
Positioning44
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD47467Last 10047%Win rateLLWLLWLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -50pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.7
Aggression4.0
Utility5.4
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels0.4
Clutch0.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 33 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 563ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.7
Positioning4.4
Utility5.4
Mechanics8.0
Opening Duels1.0
Win Impact3.3

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time569ms−65ms
first ⅓ avg 634ms → last ⅓ avg 569ms
Headshot accuracy17.2%+2.4%
first ⅓ avg 14.7% → last ⅓ avg 17.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.11Best rating — inferno 10–3
132Biggest win — dust2
7Longest win streak
L2Current streak
43In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 71% over 14dust2Weakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeB21111052%-0.01
ancientC1971237%-0.02
mirageD1861233%-0.01
infernoS1410471%-0.01
overpassA85363%-0.02
dust2D72529%-0.04
cache42250%-0.02
train43175%0.01
anubis3030%-0.03
warden1010%-0.01
office110100%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

303Matches
52%Win rate
0.93Avg K/D
63.7ADR
30%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

24%1v1 clutch win
8%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis1718%0.7613.6
Ancient1747%0.9212.9
Mirage1323%0.9113.7
Nuke1182%1.0013.4
Inferno850%0.9012.0
Dust2425%0.8114.3
Vertigo30%0.8015.0
Overpass367%0.9014.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.1%Headshot accuracy
34.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.6%Spray accuracy
86.0%Counter-strafing
8.4°Preaim
563msReaction time
24.9%T opening success
37.9%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
1.2%Flash assists
13.79HE damage / grenade
6.01Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 24.9234% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient10–13-0.0412%27 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0220%27 Aug
mirage13–60.0521%27 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0621%20 Aug
ancient14–160.0012%20 Aug
inferno13–40.0421%20 Aug
dust23–13-0.0530%14 Aug
dust22–13-0.0633%14 Aug
mirage4–13-0.1115%14 Aug
anubis5–13-0.0515%13 Aug
dust213–20.0415%13 Aug
mirage7–13-0.048%13 Aug
cache9–13-0.0419%13 Aug
inferno13–110.0123%12 Aug
dust27–13-0.0714%12 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0517%12 Aug
nuke13–70.0319%11 Aug
cache13–50.0313%6 Aug
dust213–6-0.0217%6 Aug
mirage16–120.0211%5 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0235%5 Aug
inferno13–8-0.0311%5 Aug
anubis9–130.0521%5 Aug
mirage4–130.0414%5 Aug
ancient3–13-0.0527%5 Aug
nuke7–130.0213%5 Aug
cache13–90.0220%4 Aug
inferno10–30.1115%4 Aug
cache15–15-0.079%25 Jul
nuke7–13-0.035%25 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0115%25 Jul
ancient5–13-0.017%26 Jun
mirage13–50.0519%26 Jun
overpass4–13-0.075%8 Jun
dust27–13-0.058%7 Jun
inferno13–70.0216%5 Jun
nuke16–130.0211%19 Apr
inferno13–7-0.048%19 Apr
ancient5–130.0011%30 Jan
nuke13–60.0213%30 Jan
nuke13–7-0.0013%30 Jan
mirage10–13-0.0613%30 Jan
anubis1–13-0.097%29 Jan
overpass13–50.0513%29 Jan
warden11–13-0.0115%29 Jan
office13–9-0.0215%29 Jan
nuke13–10-0.059%29 Jan
inferno13–9-0.038%28 Jan
mirage15–15-0.0010%28 Jan
nuke15–15-0.0015%28 Jan
inferno5–13-0.0515%3 Jan
ancient13–8-0.0616%3 Jan
ancient2–13-0.083%2 Jan
mirage11–130.0410%2 Jan
train13–7-0.0313%2 Jan
ancient13–5-0.0019%2 Jan
nuke8–13-0.038%2 Jan
mirage8–13-0.0116%31 Dec
mirage12–120.049%31 Dec
train6–130.0424%31 Dec
ancient3–0-0.100%31 Dec
nuke16–13-0.039%30 Dec
train13–30.047%30 Dec
inferno5–13-0.0825%30 Dec
ancient5–13-0.028%28 Dec
mirage13–10-0.029%28 Dec
nuke3–13-0.0214%28 Dec
overpass13–6-0.0717%28 Dec
inferno5–13-0.067%28 Dec
ancient5–130.0112%27 Dec
mirage7–13-0.075%27 Dec
nuke13–30.0516%27 Dec
inferno13–70.0423%27 Dec
nuke13–7-0.0217%27 Dec
ancient13–40.0014%23 Dec
overpass16–13-0.0016%23 Dec
dust22–13-0.0414%23 Dec
inferno13–7-0.0417%18 Dec
ancient13–50.0623%18 Dec
train13–7-0.035%18 Dec
nuke8–13-0.0216%18 Dec
overpass15–150.0119%18 Dec
ancient3–13-0.027%15 Dec
mirage6–13-0.0223%15 Dec
overpass6–13-0.0823%10 Dec
nuke12–120.0217%10 Dec
nuke16–14-0.028%10 Dec
ancient9–13-0.0018%10 Dec
inferno13–80.0113%10 Dec
ancient13–10-0.0312%10 Dec
nuke8–13-0.019%25 Nov
ancient15–150.0317%25 Nov
overpass13–8-0.0221%25 Nov
mirage7–130.0121%25 Nov
nuke13–9-0.0111%25 Nov
nuke2–13-0.0818%18 Nov
ancient13–11-0.022%18 Nov
inferno13–160.0118%18 Nov
overpass13–8-0.0117%18 Nov
mirage13–110.0010%13 Nov

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →