Giggelsson

Giggelsson — CS2 Stats

FI76561198071707160[U:1:111441432]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,209Tracked matches62%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidPassive Rifler
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Performance scores

Aim87
Positioning36
Utility69

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54415Last 10054%Win rateLLLWWLWWTW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.7
Aggression3.8
Utility6.9
Positioning3.6
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch4.6

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 51 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 649ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.7
Positioning3.6
Utility6.9
Mechanics8.2
Opening Duels0.0
Win Impact9.0

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time670ms+7ms
first ⅓ avg 663ms → last ⅓ avg 670ms
Headshot accuracy21.6%+0.7%
first ⅓ avg 20.9% → last ⅓ avg 21.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.19Best rating — nuke 13–2
130Biggest win — vertigo
7Longest win streak
L3Current streak
79In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

vertigoBest map · 67% over 9infernoWeakest map · 42% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeB189950%0.03
cacheB158753%0.04
anubisB137654%-0.00
infernoC125742%-0.01
ancientA127558%0.01
vertigoS96367%-0.02
officeA53260%0.02
trainA53260%0.01
dust2A53260%-0.02
mirage42250%-0.02
overpass21150%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (42% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

88Matches
60%Win rate
1.25Avg K/D
76.2ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win
31%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1656%1.2414.7
Inferno1479%1.1415.9
Nuke1392%1.7717.0
Anubis1242%1.3415.1
Dust2757%0.9513.3
Vertigo650%1.2711.7
Ancient667%1.1112.7
Overpass10%1.5039.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.8%Headshot accuracy
40.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
48.3%Spray accuracy
86.8%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
649msReaction time
29.0%T opening success
29.3%CT opening success
0.60Enemies flashed / flash
6.4%Flash assists
12.62HE damage / grenade
15.41Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 29.002% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

42% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke12–160.0624%30 Aug
cache11–13-0.0217%30 Aug
cache5–60.1037%30 Aug
cache13–1-0.068%26 Aug
cache13–80.0822%23 Aug
cache8–130.0220%23 Aug
anubis13–8-0.1020%22 Aug
office11–30.0113%22 Aug
nuke12–120.0535%22 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0127%22 Aug
cache13–30.0630%22 Aug
train7–130.0027%18 Aug
train13–90.0132%18 Aug
cache13–110.0312%8 Aug
inferno25–230.0024%7 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0510%7 Aug
ancient13–40.1126%7 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0632%6 Aug
dust213–40.0722%5 Aug
inferno13–6-0.0125%5 Aug
vertigo7–13-0.0019%4 Aug
vertigo13–100.0224%3 Aug
vertigo0–5-0.050%3 Aug
vertigo13–5-0.0131%3 Aug
vertigo9–3-0.0319%16 Jun
nuke6–9-0.0212%10 Jun
cache8–130.0621%10 Jun
overpass16–120.0714%10 Jun
nuke6–9-0.047%9 Jun
vertigo7–13-0.1420%9 Jun
vertigo13–30.0234%9 Jun
anubis13–9-0.0521%27 May
cache13–90.0627%25 May
dust25–13-0.0632%25 May
anubis13–8-0.0117%24 May
mirage8–13-0.1318%24 May
inferno9–60.0325%22 May
inferno6–9-0.1019%22 May
mirage13–60.0618%22 May
anubis3–130.0515%22 May
office13–90.0832%17 May
nuke13–110.0135%17 May
cache13–80.0327%7 May
cache8–130.0137%6 May
cache4–130.0721%6 May
cache13–90.0613%29 Apr
cache13–110.0426%29 Apr
cache10–13-0.0113%29 Apr
inferno11–130.0129%28 Apr
anubis13–4-0.0716%28 Apr
ancient13–60.0615%26 Apr
nuke13–100.0319%26 Apr
train13–9-0.0217%24 Apr
train13–50.0421%24 Apr
train11–130.0124%23 Apr
nuke14–16-0.0321%17 Apr
nuke13–60.0523%17 Apr
inferno4–130.0116%15 Apr
ancient11–130.0223%15 Apr
vertigo13–0-0.0025%11 Apr
vertigo13–90.0516%11 Apr
nuke3–130.0219%11 Apr
mirage11–130.0118%10 Apr
anubis13–40.0232%1 Apr
anubis7–130.0112%1 Apr
anubis6–13-0.0214%1 Apr
anubis9–13-0.0235%27 Mar
nuke1–13-0.0542%27 Mar
office12–12-0.0019%19 Mar
office13–40.0223%19 Mar
office11–13-0.0113%18 Mar
ancient13–11-0.0413%17 Mar
anubis13–110.0825%17 Mar
inferno5–9-0.056%12 Mar
overpass10–130.0229%12 Mar
nuke13–40.1242%12 Mar
dust216–13-0.0518%26 Feb
nuke16–120.0926%26 Feb
inferno2–13-0.0418%23 Feb
dust215–15-0.0426%18 Feb
nuke13–6-0.0230%18 Feb
nuke11–130.0413%17 Feb
nuke13–100.0521%17 Feb
ancient2–13-0.0425%17 Feb
dust213–4-0.0314%17 Feb
ancient9–13-0.0120%15 Feb
anubis15–150.0417%15 Feb
ancient13–80.0220%15 Feb
inferno13–100.0018%15 Feb
inferno4–13-0.0214%15 Feb
inferno15–150.0220%14 Feb
ancient7–130.0130%13 Feb
inferno13–30.0721%13 Feb
ancient13–100.0322%13 Feb
nuke13–110.0625%11 Feb
ancient13–90.0317%11 Feb
ancient13–3-0.0316%11 Feb
nuke13–20.1927%1 Feb
anubis12–10.0813%1 Feb
ancient2–13-0.058%1 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →