novzthefool

novzthefool — CS2 Stats

US76561198071035118[U:1:110769390]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,753Tracked matches59%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.6 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating24,898Top 25% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#3715 of 25215 tracked
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGnovzthefoolFACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER24,898 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81
Positioning49
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53425Last 10053%Win rateLWLWLWWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.1
Aggression7.4
Utility5.4
Positioning4.9
Opening Duels4.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 33 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 54% on CT to 38% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1
Positioning4.9
Utility5.4
Mechanics7.2
Opening Duels4.0
Win Impact7.9

Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time542ms+33ms
first ⅓ avg 509ms → last ⅓ avg 542ms
Headshot accuracy19.3%+0.2%
first ⅓ avg 19.1% → last ⅓ avg 19.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.21Best rating — cache 12–12
130Biggest win — mirage
7Longest win streak
56In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 83% over 6anubisWeakest map · 0% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA28161257%0.03
dust2A1810856%0.03
cacheB179853%0.05
infernoB115645%0.00
ancientS86275%0.02
anubisD8080%0.00
nukeS65183%0.02
office1010%0.08
eldorado1010%0.08
vertigo110100%0.01
debris110100%0.18

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

125Matches
55%Win rate
1.38Avg K/D
ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

1v1 clutch win
1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient250%1.2120.0
Mirage1100%1.1515.0
Vertigo1100%1.7925.0
Nuke10%1.0019.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.7%Headshot accuracy
36.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.4%Spray accuracy
82.5%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
542msReaction time
37.9%T opening success
54.1%CT opening success
0.52Enemies flashed / flash
7.9%Flash assists
8.96HE damage / grenade
6.15Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.8937% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage8–130.0113%25 Aug
dust213–90.0219%24 Aug
mirage8–13-0.067%24 Aug
dust213–110.0618%23 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0114%21 Aug
mirage13–00.1022%21 Aug
nuke13–90.0624%21 Aug
mirage4–13-0.1013%14 Aug
inferno13–30.0326%14 Aug
inferno6–130.0114%14 Aug
ancient13–90.0518%14 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0515%9 Aug
dust213–70.1226%9 Aug
cache6–130.0836%9 Aug
dust213–60.0116%9 Aug
dust213–90.0416%8 Aug
inferno16–13-0.0512%8 Aug
mirage13–90.0413%8 Aug
inferno13–80.0322%8 Aug
mirage13–80.0126%8 Aug
mirage8–130.0413%5 Aug
dust28–130.0613%5 Aug
anubis11–130.0014%5 Aug
cache13–80.0623%3 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0121%3 Aug
nuke13–9-0.0022%3 Aug
dust215–150.0732%3 Aug
ancient13–100.0426%3 Aug
cache14–160.018%2 Aug
mirage16–13-0.0221%2 Aug
anubis10–13-0.029%2 Aug
dust26–10.0050%2 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0112%2 Aug
nuke13–90.0620%2 Aug
ancient13–70.0718%1 Aug
dust212–16-0.0022%31 Jul
cache15–150.0316%31 Jul
mirage13–80.0115%31 Jul
mirage13–30.1216%31 Jul
cache7–13-0.0611%31 Jul
dust21–13-0.0644%29 Jul
cache13–10-0.0323%29 Jul
mirage13–40.0729%29 Jul
mirage13–60.0224%29 Jul
cache11–13-0.0419%29 Jul
anubis7–130.0119%28 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0217%28 Jul
mirage13–60.0420%28 Jul
mirage13–70.0414%24 Jul
mirage9–130.1214%24 Jul
mirage13–70.1422%24 Jul
cache13–90.0830%24 Jul
dust26–13-0.0615%24 Jul
nuke13–80.0311%24 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0412%24 Jul
inferno13–90.0718%24 Jul
dust213–9-0.0115%23 Jul
anubis8–130.0818%23 Jul
office10–130.085%23 Jul
eldorado8–80.0810%23 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0713%22 Jul
dust213–40.0328%22 Jul
ancient13–5-0.0018%22 Jul
nuke13–100.0017%22 Jul
mirage9–130.0625%22 Jul
vertigo13–70.0112%20 Jul
inferno7–130.0519%20 Jul
anubis12–120.0612%20 Jul
inferno3–13-0.0430%20 Jul
debris9–70.1819%20 Jul
dust213–100.1120%20 Jul
mirage7–130.0720%19 Jul
cache16–140.0511%19 Jul
cache8–130.0423%18 Jul
mirage8–130.016%18 Jul
cache12–120.2120%18 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0213%18 Jul
dust214–160.0322%18 Jul
dust24–130.0427%13 Jul
inferno6–13-0.0313%13 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0044%12 Jul
mirage13–80.0411%12 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0513%12 Jul
mirage13–20.0118%12 Jul
mirage13–60.0614%12 Jul
cache13–16-0.0211%11 Jul
dust213–80.0012%11 Jul
ancient13–2-0.0236%11 Jul
mirage10–130.0521%11 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0116%11 Jul
dust25–130.0416%11 Jul
mirage13–20.0028%10 Jul
ancient2–13-0.0110%10 Jul
cache13–100.0812%10 Jul
inferno13–8-0.0138%10 Jul
cache13–90.0317%10 Jul
cache13–70.1026%10 Jul
cache13–10.1022%10 Jul
cache13–50.1326%10 Jul
ancient13–110.0911%10 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →