Jorders — CS2 Stats

76561198069116708[U:1:108850980]✓ No bans

877Tracked matches50%Win rate2021Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.1 SolidPassive Rifler

Premier CS Rating18,163Purple band · top ~15.8% of ranked players (population est.)

FaceitLevel 7 · 1,487 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86

Positioning48

Utility56

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53–43–4Last 10053%Win rateLLLLLWLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.6

Aggression3.0

Utility5.6

Positioning4.8

Opening Duels0.0

Clutch1.8

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-fight frequency; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 38 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6

Positioning4.8

Utility5.6

Mechanics7.9

Opening Duels0.0

Win Impact5.0

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.02

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00

Reaction time546ms−53ms

first ⅓ avg 599ms → last ⅓ avg 546ms

Headshot accuracy19.6%+3.1%

first ⅓ avg 16.5% → last ⅓ avg 19.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — cache 13–2

13–1Biggest win — anubis

7Longest win streak

L5Current streak

11–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

10Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 69% over 13cacheWeakest map · 35% over 20

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	A	25	14–11	56%	-0.00
cache	C	20	7–13	35%	0.03
ancient	B	17	8–9	47%	-0.00
mirage	A	15	9–6	60%	-0.01
nuke	S	13	9–4	69%	0.01
anubis	C	7	3–4	43%	0.00
inferno	—	3	3–0	100%	-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

31Matches

55%Win rate

1.06Avg K/D

88.9ADR

48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

29%1v1 clutch win

25%1v2 clutch win

4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	8	38%	1.07	16.8
Nuke	6	67%	1.18	15.2
Dust2	5	60%	0.93	16.6
Ancient	3	67%	1.53	22.0
Overpass	3	67%	0.99	16.0
Train	2	50%	0.84	14.0
Inferno	1	0%	0.75	12.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.6%Headshot accuracy

38.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

39.4%Spray accuracy

85.4%Counter-strafing

8.8°Preaim

546msReaction time

30.2%T opening success

26.2%CT opening success

0.47Enemies flashed / flash

6.4%Flash assists

12.85HE damage / grenade

6.94Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.469 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 30.1769% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

35% win rate across 20 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	8–13	-0.02	24%	28 Aug →
ancient	11–13	-0.03	25%	28 Aug →
nuke	10–13	0.01	20%	28 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.02	21%	27 Aug →
ancient	11–13	-0.03	9%	26 Aug →
cache	13–5	0.05	15%	26 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.04	13%	25 Aug →
nuke	13–6	0.02	22%	25 Aug →
ancient	13–8	0.01	23%	25 Aug →
mirage	13–4	0.08	11%	25 Aug →
cache	8–13	-0.06	16%	25 Aug →
nuke	16–14	0.07	21%	24 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.00	20%	23 Aug →
anubis	13–8	0.02	22%	22 Aug →
nuke	7–13	-0.02	13%	22 Aug →
ancient	14–16	-0.06	21%	22 Aug →
dust2	6–13	-0.03	20%	21 Aug →
dust2	16–12	-0.06	12%	21 Aug →
ancient	6–13	-0.00	27%	21 Aug →
mirage	13–6	-0.01	9%	20 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.04	23%	20 Aug →
dust2	16–14	0.04	19%	19 Aug →
cache	13–16	-0.02	16%	19 Aug →
ancient	13–5	0.01	26%	19 Aug →
nuke	13–11	0.04	15%	18 Aug →
ancient	4–13	-0.04	24%	18 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.04	17%	17 Aug →
mirage	7–6	-0.04	36%	17 Aug →
anubis	13–11	-0.03	30%	17 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.01	25%	17 Aug →
ancient	4–13	0.03	19%	15 Aug →
nuke	13–9	0.02	17%	15 Aug →
dust2	16–12	-0.02	13%	14 Aug →
ancient	13–11	-0.02	19%	14 Aug →
dust2	13–10	-0.01	26%	14 Aug →
ancient	13–3	0.07	30%	13 Aug →
mirage	13–10	-0.05	16%	13 Aug →
nuke	13–8	0.00	20%	13 Aug →
anubis	2–13	-0.06	5%	13 Aug →
dust2	15–15	0.11	15%	13 Aug →
dust2	9–13	0.01	20%	12 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.00	30%	10 Aug →
ancient	9–13	-0.04	14%	10 Aug →
anubis	6–13	0.02	13%	10 Aug →
mirage	15–15	0.01	21%	10 Aug →
ancient	3–13	-0.07	21%	8 Aug →
nuke	13–6	0.03	19%	7 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.00	20%	7 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.01	13%	7 Aug →
dust2	13–3	-0.00	22%	7 Aug →
dust2	1–13	-0.05	13%	6 Aug →
mirage	13–8	-0.02	11%	6 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.07	11%	29 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.02	17%	29 Jul →
anubis	11–13	0.05	25%	29 Jul →
mirage	5–13	-0.07	20%	25 Jul →
cache	13–5	0.04	20%	25 Jul →
cache	13–16	0.06	17%	24 Jul →
nuke	6–13	-0.05	14%	24 Jul →
dust2	13–10	-0.01	13%	23 Jul →
cache	6–13	0.06	19%	23 Jul →
inferno	13–7	0.02	9%	23 Jul →
cache	10–13	0.10	11%	23 Jul →
cache	15–15	0.02	17%	22 Jul →
cache	13–2	0.10	27%	22 Jul →
nuke	13–11	0.00	13%	22 Jul →
mirage	13–10	-0.02	19%	22 Jul →
cache	8–13	-0.03	11%	22 Jul →
dust2	13–2	-0.00	22%	20 Jul →
nuke	13–11	-0.02	13%	19 Jul →
inferno	13–11	-0.04	16%	19 Jul →
cache	9–13	-0.05	17%	19 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.01	16%	19 Jul →
cache	8–13	0.07	27%	19 Jul →
anubis	13–1	0.03	14%	18 Jul →
inferno	13–7	-0.01	22%	18 Jul →
cache	3–13	0.01	15%	18 Jul →
dust2	13–2	0.08	21%	18 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.04	13%	18 Jul →
dust2	11–13	0.01	21%	17 Jul →
ancient	13–4	0.06	19%	17 Jul →
ancient	13–4	-0.02	24%	16 Jul →
dust2	9–13	-0.04	19%	16 Jul →
cache	13–11	0.02	13%	15 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.05	26%	15 Jul →
ancient	13–6	0.02	13%	14 Jul →
ancient	13–9	-0.00	29%	14 Jul →
dust2	13–5	-0.04	10%	14 Jul →
ancient	10–13	0.06	16%	14 Jul →
cache	13–10	0.04	14%	14 Jul →
cache	12–12	0.12	15%	13 Jul →
nuke	13–2	0.02	11%	13 Jul →
dust2	13–10	0.03	15%	13 Jul →
cache	10–13	-0.04	12%	12 Jul →
cache	7–13	-0.02	7%	11 Jul →
cache	13–2	0.14	16%	11 Jul →
dust2	6–13	-0.01	12%	11 Jul →
nuke	11–13	-0.06	6%	10 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.00	27%	10 Jul →
anubis	11–13	-0.00	12%	10 Jul →