Daicecreaman — CS2 Stats

76561198068488914[U:1:108223186]

1,352Tracked matches44%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidAggressive Rifler
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGDaicecreamanFACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim77
Positioning58
Utility64

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD523810Last 10052%Win rateTLWLWLWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.7
Aggression7.8
Utility6.4
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels2.8
Clutch7.2

Strong CT-side openerReliable in 1v1s

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 33% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 551ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.7
Positioning5.8
Utility6.4
Mechanics7.4
Opening Duels2.8
Win Impact3.1

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time549ms−38ms
first ⅓ avg 586ms → last ⅓ avg 549ms
Headshot accuracy16.4%−2.5%
first ⅓ avg 18.9% → last ⅓ avg 16.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — dust2 13–3
130Biggest win — cache
8Longest win streak
45In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 63% over 8mirageWeakest map · 38% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientB1910953%0.04
cacheA1811761%0.03
dust2C1881044%0.03
mirageC1661038%0.02
nukeA127558%0.03
anubisA85363%0.03
infernoA85363%0.03
train1010%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

64Matches
58%Win rate
1.26Avg K/D
90.9ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

56%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1450%1.2319.0
Inferno1354%1.3117.2
Ancient1182%1.4119.1
Vertigo743%1.1517.3
Anubis667%1.1116.3
Dust2683%1.2921.5
Nuke520%1.3719.2
Train10%0.8214.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.6%Headshot accuracy
37.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.5%Spray accuracy
83.1%Counter-strafing
10.8°Preaim
551msReaction time
32.8%T opening success
49.2%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
6.3%Flash assists
9.91HE damage / grenade
18.76Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.8339% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient12–12-0.0314%28 Aug
cache8–13-0.0115%28 Aug
ancient13–40.1016%24 Aug
mirage10–130.1219%23 Aug
anubis13–50.0213%23 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0411%23 Aug
cache13–30.0918%23 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0013%23 Aug
dust27–13-0.0512%23 Aug
anubis5–13-0.0219%21 Aug
dust28–130.0515%21 Aug
inferno13–8-0.0416%21 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0514%21 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0516%19 Aug
dust26–130.0215%19 Aug
cache13–30.019%19 Aug
mirage12–12-0.0214%18 Aug
cache11–130.0423%16 Aug
ancient3–130.0414%16 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0416%16 Aug
ancient13–90.0920%16 Aug
cache13–3-0.0218%16 Aug
mirage13–60.0613%15 Aug
dust213–16-0.0020%15 Aug
ancient13–60.0828%15 Aug
nuke13–30.0837%15 Aug
anubis13–4-0.0016%15 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0211%14 Aug
train10–13-0.0425%14 Aug
inferno12–120.0612%13 Aug
dust26–13-0.0514%13 Aug
anubis13–8-0.0112%12 Aug
ancient13–40.0215%12 Aug
dust212–120.0827%11 Aug
mirage13–30.090%11 Aug
anubis13–60.1014%9 Aug
ancient15–150.0210%8 Aug
dust213–40.1220%8 Aug
mirage13–40.1218%8 Aug
cache13–30.1513%8 Aug
dust213–80.0213%8 Aug
nuke13–9-0.0342%8 Aug
inferno13–50.0510%8 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0011%8 Aug
mirage13–110.0622%8 Aug
dust27–13-0.0114%7 Aug
cache13–110.1112%7 Aug
inferno10–130.0422%3 Aug
mirage12–120.0026%2 Aug
ancient16–130.009%2 Aug
nuke8–130.0428%2 Aug
mirage0–6-0.140%2 Aug
dust25–130.0518%2 Aug
cache13–00.0819%2 Aug
nuke13–80.0323%2 Aug
nuke13–70.1123%1 Aug
ancient11–130.0613%1 Aug
ancient13–6-0.0128%1 Aug
dust213–30.1614%1 Aug
cache12–12-0.0120%1 Aug
inferno9–130.0214%1 Aug
dust213–100.0219%26 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0713%26 Jul
nuke11–130.0915%26 Jul
cache13–90.0112%26 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0018%25 Jul
anubis10–13-0.029%25 Jul
anubis12–120.1423%22 Jul
cache13–70.0930%21 Jul
ancient13–70.0611%19 Jul
anubis13–70.0513%18 Jul
ancient13–20.0827%18 Jul
mirage13–40.0516%18 Jul
inferno13–70.0719%18 Jul
dust211–13-0.0214%17 Jul
nuke4–13-0.0116%17 Jul
cache13–50.0313%17 Jul
dust213–30.0625%17 Jul
mirage9–130.0317%16 Jul
nuke13–90.0614%15 Jul
mirage2–13-0.0234%13 Jul
ancient13–20.1114%13 Jul
cache4–2-0.0510%13 Jul
cache9–13-0.0317%12 Jul
dust23–13-0.0623%12 Jul
mirage7–20.0440%12 Jul
inferno13–10-0.0318%11 Jul
cache4–13-0.0529%11 Jul
dust213–60.0420%11 Jul
cache13–20.0920%10 Jul
dust213–9-0.0018%10 Jul
nuke13–90.0830%9 Jul
cache9–130.0016%3 Jul
inferno13–20.0915%3 Jul
nuke4–13-0.0116%3 Jul
ancient12–12-0.008%3 Jul
cache12–120.0316%3 Jul
ancient10–130.1220%3 Jul
dust213–80.0210%3 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0511%3 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →