d — CS2 Stats

MZ76561198067150222[U:1:106884494]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

707Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.2 DevelopingAggressive Rifler

FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim74

Positioning58

Utility11

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD47–48–5Last 10047%Win rateLLLLLLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -40pp win rate · -0.05 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.4

Aggression8.4

Utility1.1

Positioning5.8

Opening Duels3.8

Clutch1.8

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like ropz 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 591ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.4

Positioning5.8

Utility1.1

Mechanics5.4

Opening Duels3.8

Win Impact4.4

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00

Reaction time592ms−42ms

first ⅓ avg 634ms → last ⅓ avg 592ms

Headshot accuracy16.1%−0.2%

first ⅓ avg 16.3% → last ⅓ avg 16.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — mirage 13–4

13–1Biggest win — dust2

6Longest win streak

L7Current streak

5–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

11Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 71% over 7overpassWeakest map · 29% over 7

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	B	20	9–11	45%	0.01
dust2	C	19	8–11	42%	0.01
cache	B	12	6–6	50%	-0.01
nuke	C	12	5–7	42%	0.00
inferno	B	12	6–6	50%	0.04
ancient	A	11	6–5	55%	0.00
anubis	S	7	5–2	71%	0.02
overpass	D	7	2–5	29%	0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Overpass is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Overpass lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

38Matches

53%Win rate

1.35Avg K/D

80.7ADR

42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

29%1v1 clutch win

9%1v2 clutch win

4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	3	33%	1.00	10.0
Vertigo	2	50%	1.16	15.5
Anubis	1	100%	1.50	27.0
Train	1	100%	1.18	13.0
Nuke	1	0%	0.56	9.0
Ancient	1	0%	0.53	9.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.9%Headshot accuracy

39.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

36.8%Spray accuracy

74.5%Counter-strafing

8.3°Preaim

591msReaction time

38.1%T opening success

52.6%CT opening success

0.03Enemies flashed / flash

0.0%Flash assists

10.36HE damage / grenade

0.03Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.0322 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 38.1108% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Overpass

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Overpass callouts & strategy →Overpass grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
ancient	11–13	-0.06	19%	19 Aug →
cache	9–13	-0.01	13%	18 Aug →
nuke	5–13	-0.05	12%	16 Aug →
cache	1–13	-0.05	21%	16 Aug →
dust2	7–13	0.01	17%	16 Aug →
cache	4–13	-0.05	23%	16 Aug →
ancient	4–13	-0.00	18%	2 Aug →
mirage	13–7	-0.03	13%	2 Aug →
cache	13–8	-0.06	10%	2 Aug →
anubis	13–5	0.07	26%	2 Aug →
ancient	13–10	-0.00	16%	1 Aug →
ancient	16–13	0.04	17%	18 Jul →
cache	16–14	0.04	20%	18 Jul →
dust2	13–16	0.02	18%	18 Jul →
anubis	13–11	-0.01	11%	18 Jul →
ancient	12–2	-0.08	13%	5 Jul →
dust2	13–10	0.07	25%	29 Jun →
dust2	11–13	0.05	20%	27 Jun →
mirage	11–13	-0.01	12%	27 Jun →
mirage	13–4	0.14	9%	17 Jun →
overpass	1–4	0.01	33%	17 Jun →
mirage	13–6	0.01	17%	14 Jun →
dust2	13–10	0.01	13%	14 Jun →
mirage	0–13	-0.10	17%	14 Jun →
overpass	13–9	0.04	18%	14 Jun →
ancient	6–13	0.01	13%	9 Jun →
ancient	13–9	0.03	11%	31 May →
nuke	15–15	0.01	14%	31 May →
overpass	7–13	0.05	14%	31 May →
mirage	7–13	-0.06	7%	31 May →
inferno	6–13	0.09	18%	30 May →
mirage	13–9	0.00	12%	30 May →
dust2	8–13	-0.03	12%	30 May →
overpass	11–13	-0.04	7%	30 May →
anubis	13–7	0.12	10%	30 May →
mirage	10–13	0.07	13%	28 May →
inferno	10–13	-0.06	6%	27 May →
mirage	13–3	0.06	19%	27 May →
inferno	13–6	0.10	8%	23 May →
mirage	5–13	0.00	12%	23 May →
nuke	13–8	0.07	17%	16 May →
inferno	3–13	0.11	12%	16 May →
overpass	13–3	-0.01	8%	16 May →
anubis	13–6	0.03	11%	16 May →
dust2	6–13	0.02	19%	16 May →
ancient	15–15	0.09	22%	16 May →
dust2	13–7	0.04	15%	16 May →
mirage	16–12	0.02	18%	16 May →
mirage	15–15	0.03	14%	16 May →
nuke	11–13	-0.05	13%	16 May →
inferno	13–7	0.04	10%	16 May →
anubis	13–16	-0.01	16%	13 May →
ancient	9–13	0.00	22%	13 May →
nuke	13–8	-0.01	12%	13 May →
cache	10–13	-0.02	15%	30 Apr →
cache	13–6	-0.04	13%	30 Apr →
cache	9–13	-0.03	19%	30 Apr →
cache	13–10	0.06	13%	30 Apr →
cache	13–7	0.04	13%	30 Apr →
cache	13–4	0.03	15%	30 Apr →
cache	2–13	-0.06	16%	30 Apr →
dust2	11–13	-0.03	17%	26 Apr →
nuke	7–13	0.02	13%	26 Apr →
ancient	13–6	-0.02	13%	25 Apr →
inferno	6–13	0.06	12%	25 Apr →
mirage	13–7	-0.00	8%	25 Apr →
nuke	15–15	-0.02	6%	25 Apr →
mirage	8–13	-0.04	9%	24 Apr →
dust2	7–13	-0.06	16%	24 Apr →
mirage	13–11	0.04	9%	24 Apr →
nuke	13–8	-0.04	12%	24 Apr →
inferno	13–7	0.06	25%	16 Apr →
inferno	13–7	0.13	20%	16 Apr →
dust2	1–13	0.08	11%	16 Apr →
dust2	13–9	-0.00	20%	10 Apr →
dust2	13–1	0.08	16%	10 Apr →
nuke	13–9	0.07	19%	6 Apr →
nuke	13–4	-0.06	7%	4 Apr →
dust2	13–4	0.12	10%	4 Apr →
overpass	15–15	0.02	18%	2 Apr →
dust2	8–13	-0.07	12%	2 Apr →
anubis	10–13	-0.03	11%	2 Apr →
dust2	13–3	0.07	20%	1 Apr →
dust2	6–13	-0.11	10%	28 Mar →
mirage	9–13	0.04	7%	28 Mar →
mirage	9–13	0.03	18%	28 Mar →
anubis	13–8	-0.03	15%	18 Mar →
inferno	7–13	-0.05	22%	13 Mar →
nuke	4–13	0.06	17%	13 Mar →
inferno	13–5	0.01	14%	13 Mar →
dust2	13–8	0.05	20%	13 Mar →
dust2	8–13	-0.03	31%	12 Mar →
ancient	13–3	0.00	16%	12 Mar →
mirage	7–13	-0.00	17%	12 Mar →
overpass	10–13	0.08	21%	19 Feb →
mirage	5–13	0.00	14%	19 Feb →
inferno	13–11	-0.02	6%	19 Feb →
nuke	5–13	0.03	36%	19 Feb →
mirage	16–14	0.02	21%	23 Jan →
inferno	8–13	0.00	16%	23 Jan →