alberto — CS2 Stats

76561198066949517[U:1:106683789]community banned

68Tracked matches73%Win rate2026Tracked since
CSDB Rating9.0 EliteEntry Fragger
Premier CS Rating27,112Top 10% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#995 of 22233 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGalbertoPREMIER27,112 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim98
Positioning84
Utility74

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT5414Last 6879%Win rateLWLWWLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.07 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Entry FraggerHigh opening-fight frequency with above-par success in them.

Aim9.8
Aggression10.0
Utility7.4
Positioning8.4
Opening Duels9.2

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

m0NESY

Plays most like m0NESY 98% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 98 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 80% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 80% on CT to 54% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.8
Positioning8.4
Utility7.4
Mechanics7.0
Opening Duels8.0
Win Impact10.0

Composite 9.0/10 (Elite), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.10+0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.07 → last ⅓ avg 0.10
Reaction time469ms−183ms
first ⅓ avg 652ms → last ⅓ avg 469ms
Headshot accuracy33.5%+12.2%
first ⅓ avg 21.3% → last ⅓ avg 33.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 68 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.22Best rating — overpass 13–8
132Biggest win — mirage
21Longest win streak
32In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 88% over 8anubisWeakest map · 60% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageS2117481%0.13
infernoS1311285%0.08
dust2S118373%0.10
ancientS87188%0.08
anubisA53260%0.09
nuke43175%0.06
overpass330100%0.13
office32167%0.03

Across the last 68 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (60% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

31.6%Headshot accuracy
46.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.6%Spray accuracy
81.4%Counter-strafing
6.4°Preaim
452msReaction time
54.0%T opening success
79.8%CT opening success
0.75Enemies flashed / flash
11.0%Flash assists
18.99HE damage / grenade
7.71Flashes / match

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno2–50.0433%16 Feb
overpass13–80.2230%16 Feb
mirage4–130.1052%16 Feb
anubis13–40.1526%16 Feb
mirage13–80.1327%15 Feb
anubis1–30.080%15 Feb
mirage13–60.1633%15 Feb
mirage13–60.1929%15 Feb
mirage10–00.1429%15 Feb
ancient13–100.1722%14 Feb
dust26–130.1557%14 Feb
dust213–90.1038%14 Feb
mirage3–130.0164%14 Feb
nuke13–5-0.0226%14 Feb
inferno13–90.1945%14 Feb
inferno13–30.0028%14 Feb
anubis13–110.0918%14 Feb
dust210–130.0935%14 Feb
anubis2–130.0346%14 Feb
ancient9–130.0617%13 Feb
dust213–70.1551%13 Feb
overpass13–70.0230%13 Feb
mirage13–90.1630%13 Feb
overpass13–40.1620%13 Feb
inferno13–50.1625%13 Feb
ancient13–100.1616%13 Feb
nuke13–90.1424%13 Feb
dust213–40.1240%13 Feb
mirage13–110.0834%13 Feb
ancient13–50.1213%13 Feb
mirage13–70.0939%13 Feb
ancient13–50.0619%13 Feb
mirage9–130.1035%13 Feb
ancient16–130.0820%13 Feb
inferno16–130.1529%12 Feb
dust213–90.1324%12 Feb
ancient13–90.0723%12 Feb
inferno4–130.0118%11 Feb
mirage16–120.1122%11 Feb
mirage13–80.1526%11 Feb
anubis13–90.1127%11 Feb
dust213–90.1016%11 Feb
nuke13–70.1929%11 Feb
mirage13–80.1123%11 Feb
inferno16–130.1125%11 Feb
mirage13–70.1314%11 Feb
inferno13–30.1329%10 Feb
mirage13–50.2025%10 Feb
inferno13–100.0827%10 Feb
mirage13–40.1920%10 Feb
inferno13–30.0821%10 Feb
mirage13–40.2224%10 Feb
mirage13–20.1935%10 Feb
dust216–140.0915%10 Feb
dust213–50.2128%10 Feb
inferno13–30.0316%10 Feb
mirage13–40.1518%10 Feb
inferno13–90.0138%9 Feb
mirage13–90.0324%9 Feb
office5–13-0.0111%3 Feb
office13–10-0.0223%23 Jan
office13–100.1215%23 Jan
ancient13–7-0.0420%11 Jan
dust213–70.0216%11 Jan
dust26–13-0.0714%10 Jan
inferno13–60.0112%9 Jan
mirage11–13-0.0113%8 Jan
nuke8–13-0.0624%7 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

21-Win StreakAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →