noxxy — CS2 Stats

76561198065529608[U:1:105263880]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

202Tracked matches54%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.3 SolidHybrid Rifler

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Performance scores

Aim84

Positioning52

Utility35

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51–46–3Last 10051%Win rateLWWLWLWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.4

Aggression5.7

Utility3.5

Positioning5.2

Opening Duels2.5

Clutch1.8

Excellent counter-strafingLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Counter-strafing. 91% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 32 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 616ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4

Positioning5.2

Utility3.5

Mechanics9.1

Opening Duels2.5

Win Impact6.2

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.02

first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time610ms−52ms

first ⅓ avg 662ms → last ⅓ avg 610ms

Headshot accuracy21.8%−5.4%

first ⅓ avg 27.1% → last ⅓ avg 21.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.27Best rating — mirage 13–0

13–0Biggest win — mirage

8Longest win streak

1–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

10Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 58% over 31cacheWeakest map · 43% over 7

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	A	31	18–13	58%	0.03
dust2	B	18	9–9	50%	0.01
nuke	B	13	6–7	46%	0.01
ancient	A	9	5–4	56%	-0.03
cache	C	7	3–4	43%	-0.01
inferno	A	7	4–3	57%	-0.02
overpass	B	6	3–3	50%	-0.03
vertigo	—	2	1–1	50%	-0.03
train	—	2	0–2	0%	0.00
office	—	2	0–2	0%	0.00
grail	—	2	2–0	100%	0.07
anubis	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

19Matches

58%Win rate

1.38Avg K/D

102.7ADR

47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

29%1v1 clutch win

33%1v2 clutch win

10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Dust2	6	83%	1.39	16.0
Mirage	5	80%	1.99	25.0
Nuke	1	100%	1.67	10.0
Cache	1	100%	2.25	36.0
Inferno	1	0%	1.33	20.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.7%Headshot accuracy

37.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

38.9%Spray accuracy

90.9%Counter-strafing

9.1°Preaim

616msReaction time

34.3%T opening success

45.5%CT opening success

0.46Enemies flashed / flash

4.1%Flash assists

11.88HE damage / grenade

4.74Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4645 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 34.2724% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	6–13	0.04	22%	22 Aug →
nuke	13–2	0.03	23%	22 Aug →
nuke	13–10	0.10	27%	22 Aug →
vertigo	0–9	-0.05	15%	22 Aug →
mirage	13–4	0.17	27%	29 Jul →
cache	8–13	-0.08	6%	21 Jul →
mirage	13–5	-0.05	21%	21 Jul →
cache	10–13	-0.02	20%	21 Jul →
ancient	16–14	-0.01	18%	18 Jul →
dust2	13–3	0.07	21%	18 Jul →
cache	13–10	-0.01	21%	16 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.04	16%	16 Jul →
dust2	13–9	-0.07	21%	16 Jul →
dust2	10–13	0.02	18%	7 Jul →
nuke	9–13	0.06	32%	7 Jul →
ancient	8–13	-0.05	23%	7 Jul →
nuke	13–10	-0.03	17%	6 Jul →
nuke	2–1	-0.06	0%	6 Jul →
overpass	15–15	-0.05	24%	5 Jul →
ancient	13–10	0.03	23%	5 Jul →
nuke	13–9	0.09	16%	4 Jul →
overpass	13–9	0.04	17%	4 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.15	31%	4 Jul →
ancient	13–9	-0.06	17%	4 Jul →
train	12–12	0.04	30%	4 Jul →
cache	9–13	0.01	26%	3 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.07	18%	3 Jul →
dust2	11–13	0.01	24%	3 Jul →
overpass	2–13	-0.09	23%	2 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.02	33%	2 Jul →
ancient	4–13	-0.07	35%	2 Jul →
cache	13–6	-0.00	22%	2 Jul →
cache	13–10	0.07	29%	2 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.02	26%	2 Jul →
mirage	13–6	-0.01	14%	2 Jul →
dust2	13–16	-0.03	30%	1 Jul →
nuke	10–13	-0.02	18%	1 Jul →
mirage	13–9	-0.03	17%	1 Jul →
inferno	16–13	-0.04	15%	1 Jul →
ancient	13–6	-0.05	20%	1 Jul →
ancient	10–13	-0.07	24%	28 Jun →
mirage	13–10	-0.03	25%	28 Jun →
dust2	7–13	0.08	27%	28 Jun →
cache	2–13	-0.05	40%	28 Jun →
ancient	6–13	0.05	20%	28 Jun →
mirage	9–13	0.01	29%	28 Jun →
dust2	6–13	-0.05	36%	26 Jun →
mirage	13–16	-0.01	13%	26 Jun →
dust2	8–13	-0.06	20%	25 Jun →
nuke	4–13	-0.08	25%	25 Jun →
mirage	7–13	-0.05	28%	25 Jun →
mirage	13–10	0.01	8%	25 Jun →
inferno	11–13	-0.05	16%	25 Jun →
overpass	13–8	-0.00	20%	23 Jun →
dust2	13–3	0.08	36%	23 Jun →
anubis	11–13	-0.03	26%	23 Jun →
mirage	13–10	0.03	27%	23 Jun →
inferno	12–16	-0.05	29%	22 Jun →
mirage	11–13	0.03	23%	22 Jun →
mirage	10–13	-0.03	21%	17 Jun →
mirage	13–9	0.01	13%	17 Jun →
mirage	13–7	-0.03	17%	17 Jun →
mirage	11–13	-0.02	23%	12 Apr →
dust2	4–13	0.03	20%	12 Apr →
nuke	16–13	0.04	26%	29 Mar →
overpass	13–8	-0.06	27%	27 Mar →
dust2	13–7	-0.07	36%	27 Mar →
dust2	13–7	0.00	34%	27 Mar →
inferno	13–4	0.06	39%	27 Mar →
mirage	13–5	0.04	23%	22 Oct →
dust2	13–4	-0.05	24%	22 Oct →
vertigo	13–6	-0.01	29%	22 Oct →
mirage	15–15	-0.01	21%	15 May →
nuke	3–13	-0.03	31%	15 May →
mirage	13–7	0.05	24%	14 May →
mirage	16–12	0.07	22%	13 May →
mirage	13–1	0.03	22%	13 May →
nuke	13–2	0.02	22%	11 May →
dust2	3–13	0.01	32%	11 May →
office	6–13	-0.02	30%	11 May →
train	9–13	-0.04	23%	11 May →
grail	9–3	0.02	30%	11 May →
nuke	6–13	0.00	30%	11 May →
inferno	13–4	-0.01	27%	10 May →
grail	13–7	0.11	25%	10 May →
mirage	11–13	0.04	21%	30 Dec →
dust2	2–13	-0.07	24%	30 Dec →
dust2	13–9	0.13	31%	30 Dec →
mirage	13–1	0.11	22%	30 Dec →
inferno	8–13	-0.02	42%	27 Dec →
mirage	10–13	-0.03	20%	27 Dec →
mirage	13–10	0.01	36%	27 Dec →
dust2	13–6	0.13	26%	18 Aug →
mirage	13–0	0.27	35%	18 Aug →
nuke	13–16	0.03	21%	18 Aug →
overpass	2–13	-0.03	21%	4 Mar →
mirage	13–5	0.09	27%	4 Mar →
ancient	13–2	-0.02	18%	4 Mar →
inferno	13–6	-0.03	32%	4 Mar →
office	6–13	0.02	33%	26 Feb →