Bombastic Side Eye — CS2 Stats

76561198063122367[U:1:102856639]

1,846Tracked matches38%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.0 Developing
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBombastic Side EyeFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim45
Positioning65
Utility75

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD41572Last 10041%Win rateLLWWLLLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim4.5
Aggression10.0
Utility7.5
Positioning6.5
Opening Duels4.7

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 63% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 63% on CT to 34% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 637ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 70% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.5
Positioning6.5
Utility7.5
Mechanics4.4
Opening Duels4.7
Win Impact1.0

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time633ms−43ms
first ⅓ avg 676ms → last ⅓ avg 633ms
Headshot accuracy12.7%−2.3%
first ⅓ avg 15.0% → last ⅓ avg 12.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — inferno 13–4
130Biggest win — dust2
8Longest win streak
L2Current streak
69In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 64% over 14mirageWeakest map · 26% over 23
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C31112035%0.03
mirageD2361726%-0.00
infernoC1881044%0.03
nukeA149564%0.02
ancientA85363%0.03
cache41325%-0.02
overpass1010%-0.05
anubis110100%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (26% over 23). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

72Matches
49%Win rate
1.00Avg K/D
ADR
32%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

1v1 clutch win
1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust2367%1.4615.7
Nuke10%0.8713.0
Mirage10%1.2421.0
Ancient10%1.1121.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

12.8%Headshot accuracy
35.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.8%Spray accuracy
69.8%Counter-strafing
12.5°Preaim
637msReaction time
34.2%T opening success
63.4%CT opening success
0.64Enemies flashed / flash
11.8%Flash assists
9.76HE damage / grenade
25.56Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 12.5261° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 12.7821% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

26% win rate across 23 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust210–130.0211%25 Aug
mirage11–130.0413%25 Aug
nuke13–50.038%25 Aug
inferno13–90.0510%22 Aug
dust212–160.029%22 Aug
nuke10–130.0611%22 Aug
dust25–13-0.0013%22 Aug
mirage14–16-0.029%22 Aug
dust213–70.0518%20 Aug
ancient5–130.039%20 Aug
dust213–90.1219%14 Aug
inferno4–70.057%14 Aug
dust29–13-0.0014%13 Aug
ancient16–120.0712%13 Aug
nuke5–9-0.096%3 Aug
nuke13–90.1014%17 Jul
mirage16–140.0310%13 Jul
dust213–80.0813%13 Jul
dust29–130.0218%11 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0711%11 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0511%11 Jul
inferno1–13-0.096%11 Jul
cache14–16-0.0219%11 Jul
nuke13–90.0516%11 Jul
inferno13–60.1122%6 Jul
ancient15–150.0616%6 Jul
ancient2–13-0.028%3 Jul
inferno5–13-0.0216%3 Jul
mirage11–130.0210%2 Jul
dust27–130.0218%2 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0022%29 Jun
mirage13–60.037%26 Jun
dust213–110.0814%26 Jun
nuke13–6-0.0115%26 Jun
mirage13–60.0922%24 Jun
dust213–100.078%22 Jun
nuke13–100.0316%22 Jun
mirage16–120.088%22 Jun
dust29–13-0.0123%22 Jun
mirage6–130.0413%21 Jun
inferno13–40.1317%21 Jun
dust23–130.048%21 Jun
dust25–13-0.0422%13 Jun
nuke10–13-0.0115%13 Jun
inferno4–130.096%13 Jun
cache7–130.0711%13 Jun
mirage7–130.0114%3 Jun
inferno13–60.0818%3 Jun
inferno10–130.0323%25 May
dust25–130.0013%24 May
overpass10–13-0.0520%24 May
mirage6–13-0.0011%24 May
inferno13–11-0.0114%24 May
dust214–16-0.0411%23 May
mirage11–13-0.0313%23 May
nuke13–70.0315%23 May
dust28–130.0517%23 May
mirage3–13-0.0213%23 May
dust212–120.0823%23 May
ancient13–70.0312%11 May
inferno10–130.0614%11 May
dust213–00.1017%11 May
cache2–13-0.0424%11 May
inferno9–130.018%11 May
nuke7–130.0416%10 May
mirage6–130.028%10 May
inferno7–130.017%10 May
dust213–90.018%10 May
dust28–130.0118%4 May
cache13–9-0.089%4 May
dust213–100.0312%27 Apr
nuke2–13-0.0714%27 Apr
inferno11–13-0.028%27 Apr
nuke13–10-0.0226%27 Apr
dust213–40.0212%27 Apr
mirage11–7-0.039%27 Apr
nuke13–80.0915%26 Apr
dust210–13-0.0021%26 Apr
mirage0–13-0.0617%26 Apr
mirage1–13-0.0818%26 Apr
mirage10–13-0.0217%26 Apr
inferno13–70.0315%22 Mar
dust24–130.0327%22 Mar
mirage10–130.0124%22 Mar
ancient13–100.0617%22 Mar
inferno6–13-0.069%22 Mar
dust27–130.0327%22 Mar
dust213–50.0210%23 Feb
mirage7–13-0.089%23 Feb
nuke6–130.0311%23 Feb
mirage13–40.0910%2 Feb
ancient13–11-0.0111%2 Feb
inferno13–80.0714%1 Feb
anubis16–14-0.029%1 Feb
dust211–130.0117%1 Feb
dust211–130.0310%1 Feb
mirage9–13-0.0019%12 Jan
dust210–13-0.0320%12 Jan
inferno13–70.0017%12 Jan
dust213–9-0.0315%25 Dec

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →