gz1 — CS2 Stats

BR76561198061918665[U:1:101652937]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

833Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.2 SolidAggressive Rifler

FaceitLevel 9 · 2,039 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim73

Positioning57

Utility61

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY62–38Last 10062%Win rateLWWLWWLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.3

Aggression6.7

Utility6.1

Positioning5.7

Opening Duels3.0

Clutch3.2

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like b1t 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 55% on CT to 29% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 656ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.3

Positioning5.7

Utility6.1

Mechanics7.1

Opening Duels3.1

Win Impact6.1

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02

Reaction time654ms+16ms

first ⅓ avg 638ms → last ⅓ avg 654ms

Headshot accuracy26.6%+3.7%

first ⅓ avg 22.9% → last ⅓ avg 26.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.18Best rating — dust2 13–0

13–0Biggest win — dust2

18Longest win streak

8–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

8Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 76% over 21anubisWeakest map · 48% over 23

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
anubis	B	23	11–12	48%	0.01
ancient	S	21	16–5	76%	0.03
dust2	S	19	13–6	68%	0.03
nuke	S	17	11–6	65%	0.00
mirage	S	12	8–4	67%	0.00
overpass	—	3	2–1	67%	0.04
cache	—	2	1–1	50%	-0.03
inferno	—	2	0–2	0%	-0.05
vertigo	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.12

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (48% over 23). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

196Matches

57%Win rate

1.13Avg K/D

78.7ADR

54%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win

28%1v2 clutch win

16Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Anubis	48	65%	1.18	15.4
Ancient	34	68%	1.08	16.8
Dust2	33	48%	1.02	14.9
Nuke	29	62%	1.33	16.7
Mirage	27	37%	0.93	14.7
Train	4	50%	1.37	19.0
Cache	3	33%	0.88	15.3
Inferno	2	50%	1.38	16.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

26.4%Headshot accuracy

33.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

37.2%Spray accuracy

82.1%Counter-strafing

10.2°Preaim

656msReaction time

28.9%T opening success

55.0%CT opening success

0.72Enemies flashed / flash

10.0%Flash assists

9.10HE damage / grenade

11.62Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 28.8816% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

48% win rate across 23 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	5–13	0.03	40%	29 Aug →
cache	13–7	-0.04	32%	29 Aug →
ancient	13–5	0.08	38%	29 Aug →
inferno	19–22	-0.02	26%	4 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.03	22%	4 Jul →
ancient	13–4	0.02	33%	2 Jul →
nuke	12–16	-0.03	39%	5 Jun →
dust2	13–7	0.16	20%	5 Jun →
ancient	13–4	0.10	25%	5 Jun →
overpass	14–16	-0.01	14%	4 Jun →
dust2	0–13	-0.03	0%	4 Jun →
nuke	8–13	-0.00	43%	2 Jun →
dust2	13–8	0.10	18%	2 Jun →
anubis	9–13	0.10	34%	27 May →
overpass	13–11	-0.01	12%	26 May →
mirage	13–8	0.02	31%	26 May →
overpass	13–1	0.14	36%	26 May →
nuke	13–10	0.05	24%	23 May →
mirage	4–13	0.00	53%	23 May →
anubis	10–13	-0.02	24%	9 May →
inferno	0–13	-0.07	22%	8 May →
ancient	13–5	-0.01	14%	4 May →
anubis	16–13	-0.01	12%	4 May →
mirage	10–13	0.01	24%	4 May →
anubis	13–11	-0.01	27%	1 May →
mirage	13–9	0.06	22%	1 May →
cache	8–13	-0.02	25%	1 May →
mirage	13–7	0.06	20%	30 Apr →
dust2	9–13	-0.02	38%	30 Apr →
mirage	4–13	-0.07	32%	29 Apr →
anubis	13–6	0.05	30%	28 Apr →
nuke	13–10	-0.00	27%	28 Apr →
anubis	13–2	0.10	22%	28 Apr →
mirage	13–6	-0.12	11%	28 Apr →
ancient	13–10	-0.01	18%	28 Apr →
dust2	13–0	0.18	26%	27 Apr →
mirage	13–8	-0.02	18%	27 Apr →
ancient	13–11	0.04	24%	27 Apr →
anubis	13–9	0.01	16%	26 Apr →
dust2	13–10	0.02	52%	25 Apr →
dust2	13–8	-0.06	29%	25 Apr →
dust2	13–8	0.07	29%	25 Apr →
ancient	13–9	0.06	25%	25 Apr →
dust2	13–11	-0.02	26%	25 Apr →
nuke	13–7	-0.02	36%	25 Apr →
nuke	13–5	0.06	30%	25 Apr →
mirage	13–10	0.04	19%	25 Apr →
dust2	16–12	0.03	20%	24 Apr →
ancient	10–13	0.11	41%	24 Apr →
ancient	13–7	0.00	21%	24 Apr →
dust2	13–9	0.00	25%	24 Apr →
nuke	13–8	-0.01	35%	23 Apr →
anubis	13–7	-0.02	27%	23 Apr →
anubis	14–16	-0.08	16%	23 Apr →
nuke	13–8	0.09	24%	23 Apr →
dust2	10–13	0.01	29%	23 Apr →
anubis	13–6	0.01	38%	23 Apr →
ancient	13–8	-0.00	28%	23 Apr →
nuke	13–5	0.06	19%	22 Apr →
mirage	8–13	-0.06	21%	22 Apr →
dust2	13–9	0.04	32%	22 Apr →
anubis	4–13	-0.05	32%	21 Apr →
ancient	13–11	0.05	33%	21 Apr →
ancient	5–13	0.02	33%	21 Apr →
ancient	11–13	-0.02	45%	21 Apr →
anubis	2–13	-0.02	27%	21 Apr →
nuke	6–13	-0.02	31%	20 Apr →
ancient	13–10	0.06	12%	20 Apr →
anubis	6–13	-0.05	22%	20 Apr →
ancient	13–7	0.02	22%	20 Apr →
ancient	9–13	0.01	36%	20 Apr →
mirage	13–8	0.09	34%	20 Apr →
dust2	2–13	-0.07	15%	19 Apr →
ancient	13–4	0.05	19%	19 Apr →
anubis	4–13	0.04	15%	19 Apr →
nuke	14–16	-0.01	22%	19 Apr →
ancient	13–5	-0.02	13%	19 Apr →
anubis	2–13	-0.03	35%	17 Apr →
ancient	6–13	-0.04	29%	17 Apr →
anubis	7–13	-0.03	17%	17 Apr →
ancient	13–5	0.02	24%	16 Apr →
dust2	13–4	0.07	33%	16 Apr →
anubis	5–7	0.08	26%	16 Apr →
anubis	13–4	0.12	18%	16 Apr →
anubis	13–3	0.10	40%	16 Apr →
anubis	13–2	0.06	24%	15 Apr →
nuke	13–4	0.02	21%	15 Apr →
nuke	13–11	-0.00	29%	15 Apr →
dust2	9–1	-0.04	16%	15 Apr →
anubis	13–11	0.06	30%	15 Apr →
dust2	11–13	-0.07	21%	15 Apr →
nuke	3–13	-0.03	21%	14 Apr →
anubis	5–13	-0.09	23%	14 Apr →
nuke	13–10	-0.03	21%	14 Apr →
dust2	13–5	0.14	26%	14 Apr →
vertigo	0–13	-0.12	18%	14 Apr →
nuke	13–11	-0.02	13%	13 Apr →
ancient	16–13	0.02	16%	13 Apr →
nuke	5–13	-0.07	25%	13 Apr →
anubis	10–13	0.01	17%	12 Apr →