NO___osaj — CS2 Stats

76561198061135018[U:1:100869290]

1,696Tracked matches61%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.1 StrongAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating22,685Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#5620 of 20440 tracked
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

22,685Peak Premier on CSDB
1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 22,685
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 2,315 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGNO___osajFACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER22,685 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83
Positioning54
Utility66

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51463Last 10051%Win rateWLWLWLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.3
Aggression7.8
Utility6.6
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels3.3
Clutch6.0

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 51% on CT to 36% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 586ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3
Positioning5.4
Utility6.6
Mechanics7.8
Opening Duels3.3
Win Impact8.6

Composite 7.1/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time576ms−25ms
first ⅓ avg 601ms → last ⅓ avg 576ms
Headshot accuracy18.4%+0.3%
first ⅓ avg 18.1% → last ⅓ avg 18.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.10Best rating — dust2 13–3
133Biggest win — dust2
9Longest win streak
108In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 63% over 24anubisWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA2415963%0.01
dust2B23121152%0.00
infernoB189950%0.00
cacheC156940%0.01
ancientB63350%-0.00
anubisD62433%-0.00
nukeA53260%-0.01
overpass31233%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

490Matches
53%Win rate
1.01Avg K/D
69.6ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

50%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient250%0.7612.5
Nuke10%0.478.0
Inferno10%1.1919.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.6%Headshot accuracy
36.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.3%Spray accuracy
85.2%Counter-strafing
8.0°Preaim
586msReaction time
35.8%T opening success
50.9%CT opening success
0.70Enemies flashed / flash
7.5%Flash assists
14.38HE damage / grenade
13.47Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.8162% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–70.0415%27 Aug
cache6–130.0528%20 Aug
dust213–5-0.0422%13 Aug
inferno5–13-0.050%13 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0119%13 Aug
nuke8–130.0121%12 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0225%12 Aug
inferno6–130.0018%12 Aug
ancient13–6-0.0117%11 Aug
mirage13–110.0421%8 Aug
nuke13–9-0.0411%6 Aug
dust213–90.0212%5 Aug
dust213–60.0611%4 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0313%4 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0418%3 Aug
cache13–100.0425%2 Aug
cache13–60.0224%2 Aug
dust24–13-0.0538%2 Aug
dust24–130.0115%1 Aug
dust213–30.1031%1 Aug
anubis13–8-0.0317%1 Aug
dust213–16-0.0416%1 Aug
ancient13–90.0322%31 Jul
mirage2–13-0.0721%31 Jul
dust210–13-0.0414%30 Jul
cache8–13-0.0236%29 Jul
mirage15–150.0010%29 Jul
cache15–15-0.0316%28 Jul
cache13–9-0.0415%28 Jul
dust213–9-0.1116%27 Jul
cache10–130.0415%26 Jul
mirage13–90.0223%26 Jul
nuke13–6-0.013%24 Jul
mirage5–130.0024%24 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0321%22 Jul
dust213–50.0721%21 Jul
mirage13–70.0416%21 Jul
mirage13–50.0815%21 Jul
dust213–110.0116%21 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0524%21 Jul
ancient13–60.0616%20 Jul
dust27–13-0.019%20 Jul
cache8–130.0028%20 Jul
cache13–40.0317%19 Jul
anubis12–160.0616%19 Jul
cache9–130.0029%19 Jul
mirage16–140.0617%19 Jul
mirage13–40.0811%19 Jul
dust25–130.0223%19 Jul
nuke16–14-0.0111%18 Jul
anubis1–70.0016%18 Jul
cache10–3-0.0619%18 Jul
inferno9–130.0522%14 Jul
mirage13–100.0217%14 Jul
mirage13–50.0320%14 Jul
dust210–13-0.0232%13 Jul
inferno13–110.0020%12 Jul
mirage13–90.0815%12 Jul
inferno13–110.0123%12 Jul
cache12–30.0417%12 Jul
cache9–13-0.0319%9 Jul
dust213–30.086%9 Jul
dust213–9-0.0121%9 Jul
cache7–130.0710%9 Jul
cache11–130.0824%9 Jul
inferno13–90.0218%6 Jul
mirage8–130.0616%6 Jul
mirage13–4-0.0228%6 Jul
inferno12–160.0123%5 Jul
dust212–16-0.0119%5 Jul
inferno13–6-0.0317%5 Jul
nuke8–130.0117%5 Jul
anubis10–13-0.055%5 Jul
dust20–70.010%5 Jul
mirage13–80.0412%4 Jul
overpass5–13-0.0420%3 Jul
dust213–3-0.0238%3 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0113%2 Jul
ancient8–130.0123%2 Jul
inferno15–15-0.0211%1 Jul
overpass9–13-0.0122%1 Jul
inferno13–30.0916%1 Jul
mirage8–13-0.089%30 Jun
mirage5–13-0.0026%30 Jun
dust29–13-0.0316%30 Jun
overpass13–110.0116%28 Jun
inferno13–8-0.0020%28 Jun
dust214–160.0622%28 Jun
mirage13–110.0020%28 Jun
inferno5–13-0.0016%28 Jun
inferno13–7-0.0417%27 Jun
inferno5–130.0421%27 Jun
mirage11–130.0420%27 Jun
dust213–6-0.0312%26 Jun
inferno14–16-0.0117%26 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0125%25 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0815%25 Jun
anubis13–70.0125%23 Jun
ancient8–13-0.0415%23 Jun
dust213–40.0821%22 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →