earthquaaake — CS2 Stats

US76561198059821753[U:1:99556025]Steam profile ↗VAC banned

1,566Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.5 SolidPassive Rifler

FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanLegendary Eagle Master

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim69

Positioning45

Utility44

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT49–47–4Last 10049%Win rateWWLWWWLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.9

Aggression4.1

Utility4.4

Positioning4.5

Opening Duels0.2

Clutch2.4

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 80% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 38% on CT to 23% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 699ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.9

Positioning4.5

Utility4.4

Mechanics6.8

Opening Duels1.1

Win Impact7.4

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.00

first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01

Reaction time695ms+26ms

first ⅓ avg 669ms → last ⅓ avg 695ms

Headshot accuracy20.5%+5.3%

first ⅓ avg 15.2% → last ⅓ avg 20.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.10Best rating — cache 13–3

13–2Biggest win — mirage

4Longest win streak

W2Current streak

7–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

7Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 70% over 20cacheWeakest map · 29% over 17

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	C	34	15–19	44%	-0.01
inferno	S	20	14–6	70%	-0.00
cache	D	17	5–12	29%	-0.01
ancient	D	13	4–9	31%	-0.02
mirage	A	8	5–3	63%	-0.02
overpass	—	3	2–1	67%	-0.03
anubis	—	3	3–0	100%	0.01
nuke	—	2	1–1	50%	-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

704Matches

52%Win rate

1.04Avg K/D

75.0ADR

34%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

32%1v1 clutch win

20%1v2 clutch win

14Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Ancient	26	38%	0.93	14.8
Dust2	25	56%	1.16	16.1
Mirage	24	38%	1.02	15.6
Inferno	22	55%	0.93	14.1
Nuke	8	62%	1.02	16.5
Anubis	7	71%	1.34	14.0
Overpass	4	50%	1.82	17.0
Vertigo	2	0%	0.67	11.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.6%Headshot accuracy

37.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

40.7%Spray accuracy

80.6%Counter-strafing

10.0°Preaim

699msReaction time

23.2%T opening success

38.5%CT opening success

0.43Enemies flashed / flash

8.1%Flash assists

12.30HE damage / grenade

4.44Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.432 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 23.1763% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 17 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
inferno	13–9	0.02	17%	24 Aug →
dust2	13–8	-0.02	37%	14 Aug →
cache	3–10	-0.07	25%	10 Aug →
ancient	13–5	-0.05	19%	10 Aug →
cache	13–5	0.05	15%	8 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.05	30%	7 Aug →
cache	14–16	-0.03	22%	7 Aug →
inferno	13–5	0.07	23%	22 Jul →
dust2	6–13	0.03	16%	15 Jul →
inferno	13–11	0.01	32%	14 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.00	23%	14 Jul →
dust2	7–13	-0.01	18%	6 Jul →
inferno	11–13	0.00	16%	5 Jul →
ancient	7–13	-0.01	10%	5 Jul →
cache	12–12	0.02	16%	5 Jul →
nuke	9–13	-0.03	19%	4 Jul →
dust2	9–13	-0.02	30%	30 Jun →
cache	13–5	-0.04	23%	30 Jun →
dust2	13–5	-0.02	29%	27 Jun →
overpass	13–10	-0.04	19%	27 Jun →
cache	7–13	0.05	24%	27 Jun →
mirage	5–2	-0.06	50%	26 Jun →
anubis	13–10	-0.03	13%	24 Jun →
dust2	13–8	-0.01	19%	24 Jun →
inferno	2–13	-0.05	45%	24 Jun →
inferno	13–10	-0.04	17%	24 Jun →
inferno	13–7	-0.02	9%	24 Jun →
cache	12–12	0.00	9%	23 Jun →
dust2	6–13	-0.06	7%	23 Jun →
inferno	13–6	0.02	14%	23 Jun →
ancient	13–8	0.04	9%	22 Jun →
inferno	13–8	-0.01	13%	21 Jun →
ancient	13–8	-0.03	8%	21 Jun →
mirage	5–13	-0.03	11%	20 Jun →
dust2	11–13	0.01	20%	20 Jun →
overpass	13–6	0.02	16%	20 Jun →
mirage	13–7	0.06	19%	19 Jun →
inferno	13–16	0.01	13%	19 Jun →
ancient	12–16	-0.04	17%	19 Jun →
mirage	13–7	0.02	6%	18 Jun →
inferno	13–9	0.04	19%	18 Jun →
dust2	0–13	-0.09	50%	18 Jun →
anubis	13–7	0.04	16%	17 Jun →
cache	2–13	-0.01	19%	16 Jun →
inferno	13–11	0.01	23%	15 Jun →
dust2	16–14	-0.06	11%	15 Jun →
ancient	10–13	-0.02	11%	14 Jun →
anubis	13–9	0.01	20%	14 Jun →
dust2	3–13	0.01	29%	14 Jun →
dust2	13–5	0.08	15%	14 Jun →
dust2	13–11	0.00	17%	12 Jun →
dust2	6–13	-0.02	26%	12 Jun →
dust2	13–11	-0.01	14%	12 Jun →
mirage	7–13	-0.09	18%	12 Jun →
mirage	8–13	-0.08	10%	10 Jun →
dust2	13–10	0.04	12%	10 Jun →
dust2	5–13	0.02	28%	10 Jun →
mirage	13–9	-0.01	24%	10 Jun →
dust2	7–13	-0.02	33%	9 Jun →
nuke	13–8	-0.04	9%	8 Jun →
inferno	13–9	0.02	12%	22 May →
overpass	10–13	-0.08	14%	22 May →
inferno	13–4	-0.09	8%	21 May →
mirage	13–2	0.04	14%	17 May →
cache	10–13	-0.05	6%	10 May →
dust2	10–13	-0.01	13%	8 May →
cache	8–13	-0.06	14%	8 May →
dust2	1–13	-0.07	22%	8 May →
dust2	6–13	0.00	20%	8 May →
dust2	13–8	0.01	11%	7 May →
ancient	13–11	-0.04	5%	7 May →
inferno	13–9	0.03	14%	7 May →
dust2	13–8	-0.05	6%	7 May →
cache	12–12	0.04	18%	6 May →
cache	13–9	0.05	16%	5 May →
cache	12–12	-0.01	18%	5 May →
ancient	9–13	-0.04	14%	5 May →
inferno	13–7	0.01	7%	5 May →
inferno	7–13	0.03	12%	4 May →
dust2	13–6	-0.04	9%	4 May →
dust2	14–16	-0.06	15%	4 May →
cache	6–13	-0.03	10%	4 May →
cache	13–6	-0.05	26%	3 May →
cache	13–3	0.10	24%	1 May →
cache	7–13	-0.07	10%	30 Apr →
dust2	10–13	-0.00	15%	27 Apr →
dust2	9–13	-0.03	19%	27 Apr →
dust2	16–14	-0.03	19%	27 Apr →
ancient	14–16	0.02	13%	26 Apr →
inferno	13–8	-0.06	10%	19 Apr →
ancient	2–13	-0.03	14%	19 Apr →
dust2	13–8	0.05	16%	17 Apr →
inferno	9–13	-0.06	20%	17 Apr →
ancient	7–13	-0.03	14%	17 Apr →
ancient	10–13	-0.02	17%	17 Apr →
dust2	9–13	-0.04	15%	17 Apr →
dust2	13–7	0.07	26%	17 Apr →
dust2	4–13	-0.01	20%	17 Apr →
inferno	9–13	-0.02	14%	17 Apr →
ancient	6–13	-0.03	14%	17 Apr →