Slaske_

Slaske_ — CS2 Stats

DK76561198059765177[U:1:99499449]Steam profile ↗

1,560Tracked matches28%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidAggressive Rifler
CSDB Leaderboard#4474 of 5269 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,984 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanThe Global Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

2,984Peak Faceit ELO on CSDB
1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,984
  • Next: 3,000 ELO at 3,000 16 to go
  • Reached: 2,500 ELO · Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSlaske_FACEITLevel 10 · 2,984 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPEAK ELO2,984csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim78
Positioning59
Utility63

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD45523Last 10045%Win rateLTWTWLLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.05 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.8
Aggression7.3
Utility6.3
Positioning5.9
Opening Duels3.7
Clutch3.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 53% on CT to 37% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 571ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.8
Positioning5.9
Utility6.3
Mechanics7.2
Opening Duels3.7
Win Impact0.0

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time576ms−1ms
first ⅓ avg 577ms → last ⅓ avg 576ms
Headshot accuracy22.5%+0.3%
first ⅓ avg 22.2% → last ⅓ avg 22.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.30Best rating — inferno 13–5
120Biggest win — anubis
5Longest win streak
710In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 60% over 15mirageWeakest map · 30% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB21101148%0.01
ancientA159660%0.01
nukeC145936%0.01
overpassC135838%0.02
anubisA127558%0.03
mirageD103730%0.02
trainD62433%-0.00
dust242250%-0.00
grail21150%0.02
sanctum1010%0.17
poseidon1010%0.01
vertigo110100%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

3,264Matches
51%Win rate
1.07Avg K/D
80.0ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
15Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient25149%1.0215.2
Mirage20544%1.0215.6
Nuke17252%1.0616.2
Anubis15460%1.1716.5
Overpass10061%1.2417.7
Inferno9145%1.0816.4
Vertigo7265%1.0815.9
Train7156%1.1916.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.4%Headshot accuracy
32.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.7%Spray accuracy
82.4%Counter-strafing
9.2°Preaim
571msReaction time
36.9%T opening success
53.0%CT opening success
0.68Enemies flashed / flash
4.7%Flash assists
9.49HE damage / grenade
7.74Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.9008% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno11–130.0320%15 Jun
overpass15–150.1124%10 Apr
inferno13–50.3029%10 Apr
sanctum8–80.1725%22 Mar
overpass13–9-0.0329%12 Mar
poseidon7–90.0118%28 Feb
nuke16–190.0016%26 Jan
dust216–13-0.0329%31 Dec
nuke8–13-0.0420%22 Dec
overpass9–13-0.0421%14 Dec
overpass5–130.0125%5 Dec
nuke12–16-0.0018%5 Dec
ancient11–13-0.0343%4 Dec
ancient13–30.0414%2 Dec
inferno6–130.0319%1 Dec
ancient11–13-0.0124%30 Nov
inferno2–9-0.1617%28 Nov
overpass4–90.0130%28 Nov
vertigo9–50.0423%23 Nov
nuke7–90.0214%21 Nov
mirage10–13-0.0225%21 Nov
inferno9–13-0.0239%16 Nov
train13–70.0320%10 Nov
train1–13-0.0210%28 Oct
inferno16–13-0.0118%25 Oct
overpass5–13-0.0913%9 Oct
nuke10–13-0.0616%3 Oct
overpass7–13-0.0426%26 Sept
nuke13–90.0625%25 Sept
nuke8–130.0314%24 Sept
ancient9–130.0239%24 Sept
inferno11–13-0.0424%24 Sept
overpass4–13-0.0115%22 Sept
train7–130.0226%19 Sept
train13–10-0.0227%18 Sept
nuke13–100.0626%16 Sept
mirage5–13-0.0414%12 Sept
ancient13–70.0315%13 Aug
nuke1–13-0.0733%10 Aug
inferno13–110.0022%10 Aug
mirage13–100.1035%9 Aug
ancient15–15-0.0232%8 Aug
train5–130.0033%4 Aug
overpass13–40.0133%3 Aug
dust213–110.1225%26 Jul
overpass13–80.1140%26 Jul
overpass13–100.0738%22 Jul
inferno5–13-0.0313%22 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0328%22 Jul
nuke13–60.0918%20 Jul
overpass14–160.0323%17 Jul
ancient13–9-0.0115%14 Jul
anubis13–50.0413%8 Jul
ancient16–130.0519%5 Jul
overpass13–110.1227%3 Jul
grail13–80.0331%3 Jul
grail9–130.0227%3 Jul
inferno22–190.0221%2 Jul
anubis10–130.0616%2 Jul
anubis13–80.0430%1 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0225%1 Jul
inferno13–20.0114%29 Jun
inferno13–7-0.0311%29 Jun
inferno9–13-0.0023%28 Jun
anubis12–00.0833%27 Jun
inferno10–13-0.0216%26 Jun
inferno17–190.0216%16 Jun
mirage16–140.0934%13 Jun
inferno8–13-0.0234%10 Jun
anubis13–100.0027%9 Jun
anubis16–120.0133%9 Jun
anubis10–13-0.0213%26 May
train8–13-0.0227%23 May
dust211–13-0.0323%20 May
ancient13–70.0416%20 May
dust27–13-0.0624%20 May
inferno7–130.0222%18 May
nuke13–110.0420%7 May
nuke16–190.0121%1 May
anubis13–40.058%1 May
mirage3–13-0.098%26 Apr
anubis1–13-0.0319%19 Apr
anubis9–13-0.0324%18 Apr
inferno13–40.0118%17 Apr
mirage5–130.0828%17 Apr
anubis5–130.0318%17 Apr
mirage11–130.0219%17 Apr
ancient13–110.0319%17 Apr
inferno13–100.0429%16 Apr
mirage3–13-0.0029%16 Apr
ancient13–110.1222%15 Apr
nuke13–80.0117%14 Apr
mirage10–130.0316%14 Apr
anubis13–70.0827%14 Apr
ancient13–90.0133%14 Apr
inferno13–100.0627%13 Apr
inferno13–50.0923%13 Apr
nuke1–13-0.049%13 Apr
mirage13–80.0625%11 Apr
ancient2–13-0.0422%11 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102.5K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →