xXHeadShotXx

xXHeadShotXx — CS2 Stats

CN76561198058241228[U:1:97975500]Steam profile ↗

2,991Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.1 DevelopingHybrid Rifler
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,373 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGxXHeadShotXxFACEITLevel 7 · 1,373 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim64
Positioning61
Utility70

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49474Last 10049%Win rateLWLLWWWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.4
Aggression8.2
Utility7.0
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels3.0
Clutch3.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 50% on CT to 34% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 579ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.4
Positioning6.1
Utility7.0
Mechanics4.6
Opening Duels3.0
Win Impact4.4

Composite 5.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time586ms−36ms
first ⅓ avg 622ms → last ⅓ avg 586ms
Headshot accuracy27.0%+2.2%
first ⅓ avg 24.9% → last ⅓ avg 27.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.18Best rating — inferno 10–1
132Biggest win — cache
8Longest win streak
77In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 63% over 16nukeWeakest map · 38% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C2191243%0.00
infernoA2011955%0.01
mirageA1610663%-0.01
anubisB157847%-0.00
cacheA116555%0.00
nukeC83538%0.02
ancientC83538%-0.03
overpass1010%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,510Matches
48%Win rate
0.92Avg K/D
67.9ADR
54%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage37748%0.9013.0
Inferno23850%0.9213.7
Dust221437%0.8313.1
Anubis21254%0.9614.1
Ancient19049%0.8913.0
Nuke15357%0.9714.3
Vertigo4248%1.1616.1
Overpass3743%0.8512.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

27.7%Headshot accuracy
30.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
31.5%Spray accuracy
70.8%Counter-strafing
10.6°Preaim
579msReaction time
34.2%T opening success
49.7%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
14.4%Flash assists
9.00HE damage / grenade
11.51Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.2257% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke11–13-0.0532%27 Aug
dust213–8-0.0424%26 Aug
dust210–13-0.0426%26 Aug
dust211–130.0026%21 Aug
inferno13–60.0128%21 Aug
cache13–70.0128%21 Aug
anubis13–60.0329%20 Aug
inferno3–13-0.0931%14 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0128%14 Aug
inferno10–10.1825%14 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0639%12 Aug
dust29–13-0.0431%12 Aug
inferno10–130.1129%11 Aug
nuke13–110.1133%11 Aug
anubis13–9-0.0425%7 Aug
inferno3–130.0612%5 Aug
nuke15–150.0835%4 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0143%3 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0813%2 Aug
nuke9–130.0222%31 Jul
dust210–130.0730%30 Jul
cache13–7-0.0718%29 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0115%28 Jul
inferno3–00.020%28 Jul
cache13–30.1129%28 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0536%28 Jul
dust219–170.0021%28 Jul
cache12–160.0832%15 Jul
anubis13–70.0628%10 Jul
mirage13–110.0738%9 Jul
mirage13–5-0.0229%9 Jul
mirage7–13-0.1142%6 Jul
anubis11–130.0818%3 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0639%3 Jul
nuke13–60.0230%2 Jul
dust27–13-0.0127%2 Jul
inferno16–12-0.0729%24 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0435%23 Jun
anubis9–13-0.0322%22 Jun
cache13–60.0415%22 Jun
mirage13–90.0213%22 Jun
anubis13–9-0.0627%19 Jun
inferno9–13-0.0026%19 Jun
anubis8–130.0236%16 Jun
mirage7–130.0324%16 Jun
nuke8–13-0.0143%14 Jun
inferno16–13-0.0531%14 Jun
dust29–13-0.0438%12 Jun
dust24–13-0.0629%9 Jun
mirage12–12-0.0128%9 Jun
mirage13–80.0132%8 Jun
dust212–16-0.0316%8 Jun
anubis13–60.0619%5 Jun
ancient3–13-0.0238%5 Jun
mirage13–7-0.0317%5 Jun
mirage13–90.0027%3 Jun
dust213–80.0326%3 Jun
anubis4–13-0.0831%3 Jun
ancient4–13-0.0627%1 Jun
inferno13–50.0831%1 Jun
inferno13–110.0332%29 May
inferno13–100.0027%28 May
mirage16–14-0.0216%25 May
dust213–100.0637%25 May
mirage13–70.0639%24 May
anubis13–40.0429%22 May
nuke13–10-0.0241%20 May
cache10–130.0633%19 May
inferno3–13-0.0329%13 May
dust28–130.0434%13 May
inferno5–13-0.0313%12 May
ancient11–13-0.0323%11 May
ancient13–8-0.0315%9 May
inferno15–150.0725%9 May
inferno9–130.0315%9 May
dust213–90.0937%9 May
cache13–8-0.0115%6 May
ancient13–10-0.0115%29 Apr
cache11–13-0.0618%29 Apr
cache13–2-0.010%29 Apr
cache1–13-0.0427%29 Apr
dust211–13-0.0526%25 Apr
anubis16–130.0317%25 Apr
cache6–13-0.0819%23 Apr
inferno13–10-0.0332%22 Apr
nuke8–130.0441%22 Apr
dust210–13-0.0117%20 Apr
inferno13–70.0639%17 Apr
mirage13–10-0.0032%16 Apr
overpass10–13-0.0613%15 Apr
ancient13–50.0723%15 Apr
anubis9–13-0.0619%13 Apr
mirage5–13-0.0740%13 Apr
dust213–7-0.0522%9 Apr
dust213–50.1135%2 Apr
dust213–11-0.0350%2 Apr
inferno13–80.0224%31 Mar
dust213–9-0.0414%30 Mar
dust212–120.0638%30 Mar
mirage16–19-0.0220%30 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →