hoof — CS2 Stats

76561198056786865[U:1:96521137]

1,882Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating20,782Pink band · top ~7.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#7880 of 20405 tracked
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGhoofFACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER20,782 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim68
Positioning43
Utility73

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50482Last 10050%Win rateWLWWLWWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution leads the profile while opening activity stays low.

Aim6.8
Aggression2.8
Utility7.3
Positioning4.3
Opening Duels0.6

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower opening-fight frequency; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.79 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 45% on CT to 20% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 637ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.8
Positioning4.3
Utility7.3
Mechanics8.2
Opening Duels1.8
Win Impact5.0

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time636ms+27ms
first ⅓ avg 609ms → last ⅓ avg 636ms
Headshot accuracy20.2%−0.1%
first ⅓ avg 20.3% → last ⅓ avg 20.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.19Best rating — dust2 13–1
131Biggest win — ancient
6Longest win streak
410In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 67% over 9infernoWeakest map · 33% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A23131057%0.02
mirageB22111150%0.01
ancientC146843%0.02
nukeB126650%0.01
cacheB115645%-0.02
anubisS96367%0.02
infernoD93633%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

906Matches
51%Win rate
1.11Avg K/D
ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

1v1 clutch win
1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage7543%1.0415.3
Inferno4657%1.0414.3
Anubis3845%1.1015.2
Ancient3757%1.1215.1
Vertigo2143%1.0114.9
Overpass1638%1.0616.0
Nuke1267%1.0613.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.3%Headshot accuracy
32.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
31.5%Spray accuracy
86.7%Counter-strafing
9.2°Preaim
637msReaction time
19.7%T opening success
44.8%CT opening success
0.79Enemies flashed / flash
8.3%Flash assists
13.33HE damage / grenade
8.03Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 19.7367% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–8-0.0021%23 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0312%23 Aug
mirage13–5-0.0713%23 Aug
anubis13–70.0311%21 Aug
nuke14–160.0830%21 Aug
ancient13–10.0214%21 Aug
mirage13–80.1021%21 Aug
cache3–13-0.0817%21 Aug
anubis11–130.0519%21 Aug
dust20–8-0.100%7 Aug
dust26–130.0424%4 Aug
ancient4–13-0.128%4 Aug
ancient13–160.0122%4 Aug
cache13–40.029%4 Aug
mirage13–60.0523%4 Aug
dust215–15-0.0112%4 Aug
mirage6–130.0320%3 Aug
dust28–130.0431%3 Aug
dust25–13-0.0529%3 Aug
nuke15–15-0.0420%3 Aug
dust213–100.0117%3 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0621%2 Aug
dust213–10.1928%2 Aug
mirage13–50.0519%2 Aug
ancient11–130.0533%2 Aug
ancient13–50.1025%2 Aug
inferno7–110.0429%2 Aug
mirage13–80.0123%2 Aug
dust216–14-0.0220%2 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0122%2 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0231%2 Aug
anubis8–130.0526%2 Aug
cache16–13-0.0117%2 Aug
nuke13–90.0619%2 Aug
dust27–130.0219%2 Aug
anubis13–60.0424%2 Aug
dust213–50.0522%2 Aug
dust213–70.0311%2 Aug
anubis7–30.0618%2 Aug
mirage11–130.0119%2 Aug
inferno13–80.0518%1 Aug
dust211–130.0719%1 Aug
ancient9–130.0227%1 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0234%1 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0726%1 Aug
dust213–50.0329%1 Aug
dust213–40.1440%1 Aug
ancient4–130.0529%1 Aug
mirage13–70.1129%1 Aug
mirage13–30.0320%31 Jul
cache13–10-0.0118%31 Jul
dust213–90.0420%31 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0234%30 Jul
inferno11–130.0230%30 Jul
anubis13–90.0718%29 Jul
inferno8–130.0822%26 Jul
cache10–13-0.0427%26 Jul
anubis13–30.0417%26 Jul
cache4–13-0.0710%26 Jul
nuke3–13-0.0523%26 Jul
dust214–160.0228%26 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0329%26 Jul
ancient13–100.0823%26 Jul
mirage10–130.0617%26 Jul
dust29–13-0.0129%25 Jul
mirage13–20.0514%25 Jul
mirage1–50.0133%25 Jul
inferno5–13-0.0121%25 Jul
dust216–12-0.0417%25 Jul
nuke13–60.0426%25 Jul
mirage2–13-0.0610%25 Jul
nuke4–130.0118%24 Jul
ancient13–40.1725%24 Jul
inferno13–60.1525%24 Jul
dust213–60.0226%22 Jul
nuke13–50.0118%22 Jul
cache5–130.0631%22 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0321%22 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0720%22 Jul
ancient13–20.008%22 Jul
dust216–140.0218%22 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0319%22 Jul
cache11–13-0.0110%22 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0135%21 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0612%20 Jul
ancient13–30.0328%20 Jul
nuke13–100.0325%20 Jul
dust24–13-0.1217%20 Jul
cache1–13-0.110%19 Jul
cache13–100.0023%19 Jul
cache13–50.0215%19 Jul
ancient3–13-0.1114%19 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0818%19 Jul
inferno13–11-0.0318%19 Jul
nuke13–9-0.0230%19 Jul
mirage13–60.0221%19 Jul
anubis13–10-0.0812%19 Jul
nuke13–60.0428%19 Jul
dust213–110.0626%19 Jul
mirage7–130.0536%19 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →