FOSHER

FOSHER — CS2 Stats

76561198054067968[U:1:93802240]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

645Tracked matches52%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating23,677Top 50% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#5504 of 26669 tracked
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGFOSHERFACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER23,677 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim64
Positioning48
Utility74

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY55432Last 10055%Win rateLWLLLWWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution leads the profile while opening activity stays low.

Aim6.4
Aggression4.7
Utility7.4
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels0.7
Clutch4.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 43% on CT to 22% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.4
Positioning4.8
Utility7.4
Mechanics5.2
Opening Duels1.7
Win Impact5.6

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time535ms−45ms
first ⅓ avg 579ms → last ⅓ avg 535ms
Headshot accuracy16.4%−0.2%
first ⅓ avg 16.6% → last ⅓ avg 16.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.27Best rating — mirage 7–1
132Biggest win — mirage
7Longest win streak
84In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 71% over 7dust2Weakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB33171652%0.01
ancientS2013765%0.02
infernoS1812667%0.02
anubisA116555%0.02
cacheS75271%-0.02
dust2D72529%-0.00
overpass2020%0.03
nuke1010%-0.05
vertigo1010%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

178Matches
51%Win rate
1.04Avg K/D
77.2ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
26%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage4564%1.1616.5
Anubis3158%1.0915.9
Ancient2548%0.9414.4
Dust22241%0.9314.1
Inferno1030%1.1213.8
Cache1020%1.1117.3
Nuke450%1.0516.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.2%Headshot accuracy
31.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.1%Spray accuracy
73.3%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
526msReaction time
22.3%T opening success
43.2%CT opening success
0.69Enemies flashed / flash
6.1%Flash assists
9.98HE damage / grenade
19.99Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 22.3227% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache7–13-0.0611%27 Aug
ancient19–160.0018%24 Aug
anubis10–130.0418%20 Aug
inferno4–13-0.0416%20 Aug
cache7–130.0517%16 Aug
mirage13–80.0112%16 Aug
ancient13–30.0211%16 Aug
mirage13–20.0610%11 Aug
mirage13–160.0527%5 Aug
dust28–13-0.0119%31 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0922%28 Jul
ancient13–7-0.068%24 Jul
ancient13–30.0115%20 Jul
mirage4–13-0.109%18 Jul
cache13–11-0.0220%18 Jul
dust21–13-0.0318%18 Jul
ancient13–90.0716%17 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0512%17 Jul
cache13–11-0.0225%17 Jul
anubis5–130.0618%14 Jul
cache13–8-0.0318%14 Jul
cache16–12-0.059%14 Jul
anubis13–80.0715%14 Jul
ancient13–90.0417%12 Jul
ancient13–2-0.0013%12 Jul
overpass2–80.1025%5 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0219%2 Jul
ancient14–160.0123%30 Jun
dust210–130.0321%30 Jun
mirage15–15-0.0124%30 Jun
anubis14–160.048%28 Jun
nuke5–13-0.0513%28 Jun
anubis13–60.0217%28 Jun
mirage8–130.0027%28 Jun
overpass6–13-0.049%28 Jun
dust29–13-0.0427%28 Jun
ancient13–40.0220%28 Jun
ancient7–130.0515%28 Jun
inferno13–40.1027%27 Jun
ancient13–110.0413%27 Jun
inferno13–40.1425%27 Jun
mirage9–13-0.0316%27 Jun
inferno13–110.109%24 Jun
anubis13–80.0311%24 Jun
mirage13–7-0.0121%24 Jun
anubis13–80.0020%24 Jun
mirage13–20.0518%24 Jun
cache13–90.0123%24 Jun
inferno13–60.0328%24 Jun
dust24–13-0.0418%24 Jun
ancient13–110.0917%19 Jun
mirage0–7-0.0325%19 Jun
dust213–110.0630%19 Jun
ancient13–16-0.074%19 Aug
mirage5–130.0417%19 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0510%18 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0018%8 Jan
inferno13–60.0119%8 Jan
inferno3–13-0.0531%8 Jan
inferno5–13-0.0522%7 Jan
mirage9–13-0.0419%7 Jan
mirage7–10.2711%7 Jan
inferno11–130.0330%7 Jan
inferno13–70.0220%7 Jan
inferno13–7-0.0116%7 Jan
mirage9–13-0.0113%7 Jan
inferno13–7-0.0031%6 Jan
inferno1–6-0.080%6 Jan
mirage13–80.0015%6 Jan
mirage13–9-0.0223%6 Jan
inferno13–90.0324%5 Jan
mirage13–50.0720%3 Jan
inferno10–13-0.0117%2 Jan
mirage13–80.0421%1 Jan
mirage13–11-0.0522%1 Jan
ancient8–130.0520%1 Jan
ancient13–5-0.0113%29 Dec
vertigo11–13-0.0211%29 Dec
inferno13–50.0124%28 Dec
mirage8–13-0.0219%27 Dec
dust213–6-0.0021%27 Dec
mirage13–80.0711%26 Dec
mirage13–11-0.0015%23 Dec
mirage8–130.0314%21 Dec
mirage13–70.0420%21 Dec
anubis8–130.0214%21 Dec
ancient4–13-0.0336%21 Dec
inferno13–30.0719%21 Dec
ancient6–13-0.0423%21 Dec
mirage9–13-0.0117%21 Dec
anubis13–50.0110%20 Dec
mirage15–150.0114%20 Dec
inferno13–100.0112%20 Dec
mirage13–90.0420%20 Dec
mirage13–30.0515%20 Dec
ancient13–20.2121%22 Mar
mirage10–5-0.0217%22 Mar
mirage0–11-0.100%21 Mar
anubis6–13-0.0615%21 Mar
anubis13–70.015%21 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →