Grendel's mom — CS2 Stats

76561198053984080[U:1:93718352]

992Tracked matches52%Win rate2024Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.2 StrongHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating18,131Purple band · top ~15.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#8614 of 15899 tracked
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGGrendel's momPREMIER18,131 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim94
Positioning60
Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY43552Last 10043%Win rateLLWLWLWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim9.4
Aggression5.5
Utility5.0
Positioning6.0
Opening Duels4.3
Clutch5.2

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 94 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Counter-strafing. 94% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 34 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 59% on CT to 35% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 578ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.4
Positioning6.0
Utility5.0
Mechanics9.8
Opening Duels4.3
Win Impact5.6

Composite 7.2/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time582ms−72ms
first ⅓ avg 653ms → last ⅓ avg 582ms
Headshot accuracy30.0%−0.4%
first ⅓ avg 30.4% → last ⅓ avg 30.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.12Best rating — inferno 13–4
132Biggest win — anubis
6Longest win streak
L2Current streak
48In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
15Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 75% over 8nukeWeakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B32161650%0.02
mirageD1961332%0.01
ancientC135838%0.01
infernoD113827%0.01
cacheA116555%0.02
anubisS86275%-0.01
nukeD61517%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

175Matches
59%Win rate
1.40Avg K/D
82.5ADR
55%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

46%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage4151%1.4616.4
Dust23256%1.3216.4
Ancient2669%1.4717.7
Inferno1669%1.5616.8
Nuke683%1.7917.5
Anubis475%1.2618.3
Train10%0.7613.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

30.4%Headshot accuracy
38.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.8%Spray accuracy
94.1%Counter-strafing
8.5°Preaim
578msReaction time
35.3%T opening success
58.9%CT opening success
0.50Enemies flashed / flash
10.5%Flash assists
10.21HE damage / grenade
6.50Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.2517% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis4–13-0.0025%25 Aug
inferno9–130.0030%25 Aug
dust213–100.0343%25 Aug
mirage11–130.0022%24 Aug
anubis13–20.1032%24 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0721%24 Aug
inferno13–40.1225%23 Aug
inferno4–130.0141%23 Aug
dust213–50.0937%23 Aug
dust27–130.1054%23 Aug
nuke5–130.0539%22 Aug
dust210–130.0634%22 Aug
inferno12–160.0421%22 Aug
ancient13–100.0635%21 Aug
mirage13–90.0429%21 Aug
dust213–11-0.0630%21 Aug
ancient16–13-0.0523%20 Aug
dust213–90.0329%20 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0238%20 Aug
dust213–16-0.0325%19 Aug
nuke13–30.0423%18 Aug
mirage9–130.0421%18 Aug
nuke15–150.0229%18 Aug
cache13–70.0341%18 Aug
dust213–4-0.0213%17 Aug
dust213–80.0128%17 Aug
mirage14–160.0331%17 Aug
cache5–13-0.0524%17 Aug
anubis13–6-0.0458%17 Aug
ancient13–110.0820%16 Aug
anubis13–90.0521%16 Aug
cache11–130.0323%15 Aug
mirage13–60.0623%15 Aug
ancient4–130.0927%15 Aug
dust26–130.0636%15 Aug
dust213–60.0341%13 Aug
dust27–13-0.0122%13 Aug
anubis13–7-0.0122%13 Aug
ancient13–110.0827%10 Aug
ancient4–13-0.0421%8 Aug
cache6–130.1025%8 Aug
dust213–100.0638%7 Aug
cache13–70.0021%7 Aug
anubis13–5-0.0548%7 Aug
mirage16–130.0124%7 Aug
dust213–4-0.0418%6 Aug
cache13–5-0.0315%30 Jul
dust213–16-0.0318%29 Jul
dust213–70.0940%29 Jul
dust213–70.0714%28 Jul
inferno10–130.0521%28 Jul
mirage15–15-0.0017%26 Jul
mirage13–3-0.0516%26 Jul
cache11–130.0530%26 Jul
mirage11–130.0620%26 Jul
mirage14–160.0828%25 Jul
dust213–60.0627%25 Jul
nuke8–13-0.0329%25 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0027%25 Jul
dust213–60.0929%25 Jul
dust213–90.0235%24 Jul
inferno5–13-0.0822%24 Jul
cache13–110.0132%24 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0250%24 Jul
cache7–130.0138%24 Jul
anubis8–13-0.1036%23 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0025%23 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0915%23 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0821%23 Jul
dust28–13-0.0718%23 Jul
dust212–16-0.1138%23 Jul
ancient14–16-0.0419%22 Jul
dust27–13-0.049%22 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0131%22 Jul
dust29–130.0331%21 Jul
inferno13–100.0540%21 Jul
mirage8–130.0220%21 Jul
dust23–13-0.0339%21 Jul
nuke10–13-0.0718%20 Jul
cache13–90.0348%20 Jul
inferno9–130.0127%20 Jul
cache13–80.0236%19 Jul
mirage11–130.0029%19 Jul
dust27–130.0834%19 Jul
dust212–160.0235%19 Jul
ancient13–80.0932%18 Jul
anubis13–7-0.0146%18 Jul
mirage4–130.0433%18 Jul
dust212–16-0.0313%18 Jul
mirage0–3-0.0333%18 Jul
nuke5–130.0538%18 Jul
mirage2–13-0.0314%18 Jul
dust213–30.1134%18 Jul
dust23–13-0.0118%18 Jul
dust210–13-0.0124%18 Jul
inferno16–130.0029%17 Jul
mirage13–80.0163%17 Jul
ancient13–160.0528%17 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0522%17 Jul
dust213–50.0665%17 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →