Snösprång <3

Snösprång <3 — CS2 Stats

SE76561198049936661[U:1:89670933]Steam profile ↗

1,350Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.1 DevelopingHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating18,891Purple band · top ~12.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#23055 of 51691 tracked
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,357 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSnösprång <3FACEITLevel 6 · 1,357 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER18,891 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim67
Positioning42
Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD53443Last 10053%Win rateLLLLWWLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.7
Aggression6.1
Utility5.5
Positioning4.2
Opening Duels1.9
Clutch4.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 54% on CT to 21% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.7
Positioning4.2
Utility5.5
Mechanics4.5
Opening Duels3.0
Win Impact4.4

Composite 5.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time499ms−53ms
first ⅓ avg 552ms → last ⅓ avg 499ms
Headshot accuracy17.1%+2.7%
first ⅓ avg 14.5% → last ⅓ avg 17.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.25Best rating — ancient 13–6
130Biggest win — dust2
6Longest win streak
L4Current streak
145In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 64% over 14overpassWeakest map · 33% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A39221756%-0.00
ancientB24131154%0.01
mirageA149564%-0.01
overpassD124833%0.00
cacheB63350%0.01
inferno32167%-0.01
anubis2020%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Overpass is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Overpass lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

21Matches
76%Win rate
1.37Avg K/D
99.9ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
15%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage667%1.3220.2
Overpass4100%1.5218.5
Ancient367%1.8119.7
Nuke250%1.3429.0
Dust22100%1.5416.5
Inferno2100%0.8723.0
Anubis1100%1.5420.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.1%Headshot accuracy
33.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.3%Spray accuracy
70.1%Counter-strafing
10.5°Preaim
504msReaction time
21.1%T opening success
53.8%CT opening success
0.63Enemies flashed / flash
6.4%Flash assists
8.47HE damage / grenade
8.19Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 21.0985% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Overpass

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Overpass callouts & strategyOverpass grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust210–130.0721%13 Aug
cache9–130.0015%13 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0217%13 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0018%13 Aug
overpass13–6-0.0520%13 Aug
ancient13–80.0218%11 Aug
mirage5–13-0.078%11 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0319%11 Aug
dust213–110.1018%11 Aug
ancient11–13-0.048%7 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0520%7 Aug
cache13–60.0127%7 Aug
dust213–50.0525%7 Aug
dust213–00.0621%7 Aug
dust210–13-0.0516%18 Jul
mirage4–13-0.116%18 Jul
ancient15–15-0.0214%18 Jul
dust28–13-0.0730%18 Jul
cache13–70.0727%18 Jul
dust213–60.0420%18 Jul
dust213–110.0521%18 Jul
cache13–11-0.0514%18 Jul
dust210–130.0214%18 Jul
dust216–140.0315%18 Jul
ancient13–10.0211%18 Jul
dust26–13-0.066%18 Jul
mirage13–30.0913%18 Jul
ancient13–110.0018%18 Jul
cache11–130.0011%18 Jul
cache6–13-0.0024%18 Jul
mirage13–90.0120%28 Jun
ancient13–110.0118%21 Jun
mirage13–40.0513%21 Jun
overpass6–13-0.0114%21 Jun
ancient9–13-0.027%21 Jun
overpass10–130.0516%21 Jun
ancient4–130.0111%16 Jun
dust213–70.0917%16 Jun
ancient11–130.0116%16 Jun
dust210–13-0.0621%16 Jun
ancient13–70.0327%16 Jun
inferno16–140.0014%15 Jun
dust214–16-0.047%14 Jun
overpass2–13-0.059%14 Jun
dust213–100.0517%14 Jun
dust213–10-0.0313%14 Jun
mirage13–80.0713%14 Jun
ancient1–13-0.1017%14 Jun
overpass7–13-0.0427%13 Jun
mirage13–90.0019%13 Jun
dust216–130.0318%12 Jun
overpass13–50.0720%12 Jun
overpass13–60.0712%11 Jun
dust213–40.0323%11 Jun
dust216–140.0016%11 Jun
dust28–13-0.0319%11 Jun
ancient13–110.0213%9 Jun
ancient13–110.027%9 Jun
overpass12–16-0.0024%9 Jun
ancient13–30.0110%8 Jun
ancient13–60.2516%8 Jun
dust213–11-0.0115%7 Jun
mirage13–4-0.0813%7 Jun
dust210–130.0112%7 Jun
overpass7–13-0.0512%7 Jun
mirage16–12-0.0711%7 Jun
dust29–130.0413%7 Jun
dust28–130.0327%7 Jun
dust213–50.0113%6 Jun
dust20–8-0.0814%6 Jun
dust27–13-0.0411%6 Jun
ancient13–110.0014%5 Jun
overpass10–13-0.0113%5 Jun
mirage8–130.0518%5 Jun
ancient11–13-0.0314%4 Jun
dust213–50.0016%4 Jun
ancient13–50.0412%4 Jun
dust213–3-0.0613%4 Jun
ancient10–13-0.0313%4 Jun
dust29–13-0.0411%4 Jun
mirage13–60.0410%4 Jun
dust213–10-0.0521%2 Jun
ancient13–6-0.0218%2 Jun
dust213–90.0321%1 Jun
dust215–15-0.0619%1 Jun
dust215–15-0.0314%28 May
dust213–2-0.0117%28 May
mirage13–11-0.0315%28 May
inferno13–4-0.0118%27 May
dust25–13-0.0416%27 May
anubis8–130.0812%27 May
mirage10–13-0.0513%27 May
dust216–13-0.009%24 May
ancient16–130.0711%24 May
dust213–8-0.0318%24 May
ancient7–13-0.027%23 May
overpass13–110.1017%23 May
dust213–6-0.0211%23 May
anubis9–13-0.0412%23 May
overpass9–13-0.038%22 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →