wing — CS2 Stats

76561198049697580[U:1:89431852]

1,280Tracked matches59%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.9 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating24,457Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#3301 of 18014 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,747 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGwingFACEITLevel 9 · 1,747 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER24,457 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim79
Positioning61
Utility69

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD56413Last 10056%Win rateWLTLLLWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -60pp win rate · -0.05 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.9
Aggression7.4
Utility6.9
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels2.7
Clutch5.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 48% on CT to 33% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 584ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.9
Positioning6.1
Utility6.9
Mechanics7.2
Opening Duels2.7
Win Impact7.9

Composite 6.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time589ms−7ms
first ⅓ avg 596ms → last ⅓ avg 589ms
Headshot accuracy17.7%+0.6%
first ⅓ avg 17.0% → last ⅓ avg 17.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.11Best rating — anubis 13–11
131Biggest win — nuke
7Longest win streak
104In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 65% over 23ancientWeakest map · 47% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B24121250%0.03
mirageS2315865%0.02
infernoS1711665%0.03
ancientB157847%0.02
anubisA138562%0.03
nuke31233%0.00
overpass31233%0.03
cache21150%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (47% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

198Matches
60%Win rate
1.37Avg K/D
86.3ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

49%1v1 clutch win
27%1v2 clutch win
14Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage4060%1.1916.5
Ancient2650%1.3018.9
Dust22572%1.3816.7
Anubis1155%1.1615.8
Inferno967%1.5921.8
Nuke2100%1.2813.5
Overpass1100%1.2515.0
Vertigo10%0.8511.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.5%Headshot accuracy
39.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.3%Spray accuracy
82.4%Counter-strafing
10.0°Preaim
584msReaction time
33.4%T opening success
48.5%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
8.4%Flash assists
9.50HE damage / grenade
15.59Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.3887% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

47% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–3-0.0211%23 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0213%23 Aug
ancient15–150.0215%23 Aug
anubis11–130.0011%23 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0613%23 Aug
dust210–130.0717%9 Aug
inferno13–100.0413%9 Aug
mirage13–30.0117%9 Aug
cache5–13-0.0012%9 Aug
nuke4–13-0.078%9 Aug
mirage13–70.0920%9 Aug
inferno13–30.0318%9 Aug
dust213–60.0318%9 Aug
ancient13–70.0810%8 Aug
dust213–80.0034%8 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0111%8 Aug
inferno13–30.0621%8 Aug
dust20–30.0967%8 Aug
dust213–90.0725%19 Jul
cache13–90.0024%19 Jul
ancient5–130.0219%19 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0319%3 Jul
dust213–60.0622%20 Jun
ancient10–130.0217%20 Jun
dust213–7-0.0014%7 Jun
mirage10–130.0214%7 Jun
anubis6–130.0117%7 Jun
anubis13–90.0110%1 Jun
dust29–13-0.0414%31 May
mirage16–130.0615%31 May
ancient13–30.0914%31 May
inferno13–60.0613%31 May
dust213–110.0219%31 May
dust215–150.0212%31 May
anubis13–90.0411%31 May
mirage13–60.0719%30 May
dust26–130.0113%30 May
mirage10–130.0823%30 May
inferno13–60.0010%30 May
dust216–13-0.0212%30 May
overpass10–13-0.0114%30 May
inferno13–100.0520%30 May
mirage12–160.0318%30 May
inferno8–130.0420%26 May
anubis13–70.0411%26 May
anubis13–60.0116%25 May
ancient5–130.0113%25 May
mirage13–110.0321%25 May
dust213–90.0025%25 May
anubis13–20.0824%25 May
inferno10–130.1023%25 May
inferno13–80.0225%25 May
ancient13–80.0414%25 May
anubis13–60.0418%25 May
ancient13–9-0.0013%25 May
mirage6–13-0.0417%25 May
nuke13–10.0712%25 May
dust29–13-0.0121%25 May
dust210–130.0214%24 May
ancient13–100.0313%24 May
inferno8–130.0620%24 May
mirage13–90.0716%23 May
mirage13–9-0.0322%23 May
dust213–110.0418%23 May
mirage13–9-0.0119%23 May
dust29–130.0318%23 May
overpass7–130.039%11 May
dust213–70.0718%11 May
anubis7–13-0.0119%11 May
ancient8–130.0112%11 May
overpass16–140.0714%9 May
mirage13–90.0111%9 May
anubis13–16-0.0019%9 May
ancient15–150.0114%9 May
ancient13–60.0311%9 May
mirage13–30.0913%8 May
inferno8–130.0013%8 May
inferno16–140.019%4 May
ancient2–13-0.0518%4 May
mirage10–130.0712%30 Apr
mirage7–130.0039%30 Apr
inferno13–11-0.0516%30 Apr
dust210–13-0.0427%27 Apr
anubis13–110.1119%25 Apr
inferno10–130.0221%24 Apr
nuke5–130.0016%22 Apr
inferno11–130.0612%19 Apr
mirage13–110.0015%19 Apr
mirage13–10-0.0016%18 Apr
mirage13–80.0521%18 Apr
dust214–160.0814%18 Apr
ancient11–130.0620%17 Apr
inferno13–70.0013%13 Apr
dust213–100.0421%13 Apr
anubis8–130.0617%13 Apr
dust29–13-0.0123%12 Apr
dust210–130.1024%12 Apr
ancient13–11-0.006%12 Apr
inferno13–90.0424%12 Apr
mirage13–10-0.0214%12 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →