w1nthrop — CS2 Stats

76561198049422365[U:1:89156637]

3,485Tracked matches60%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.4 SolidPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating24,399Top 25% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#4209 of 24017 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 1,726 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGw1nthropFACEITLevel 10 · 1,726 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER24,399 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim82
Positioning45
Utility51

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54451Last 10054%Win rateWWLWLWWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.2
Aggression3.5
Utility5.1
Positioning4.5
Opening Duels0.4
Clutch3.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.7° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 36 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 39% on CT to 24% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.2
Positioning4.5
Utility5.1
Mechanics7.9
Opening Duels1.2
Win Impact8.3

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time641ms+10ms
first ⅓ avg 631ms → last ⅓ avg 641ms
Headshot accuracy25.0%+3.9%
first ⅓ avg 21.0% → last ⅓ avg 25.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.18Best rating — mirage 13–3
132Biggest win — ancient
4Longest win streak
W2Current streak
112In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
17Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 69% over 13nukeWeakest map · 40% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB32161650%-0.01
dust2B1991047%-0.01
anubisA149564%-0.02
ancientA148657%-0.01
cacheS139469%0.01
nukeC52340%-0.00
inferno31233%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,431Matches
50%Win rate
0.99Avg K/D
78.0ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage70347%0.9715.4
Anubis49354%1.0515.7
Ancient46350%0.9615.3
Dust218248%0.9514.7
Vertigo16051%0.9415.9
Nuke9745%0.8914.2
Inferno7446%0.9214.1
Overpass4045%0.8714.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.3%Headshot accuracy
40.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.7%Spray accuracy
85.5%Counter-strafing
10.7°Preaim
636msReaction time
23.6%T opening success
39.3%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
2.1%Flash assists
8.21HE damage / grenade
5.55Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 23.5871% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–9-0.1030%22 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0129%22 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0127%10 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0020%10 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0227%10 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0129%9 Aug
dust216–140.0019%9 Aug
dust28–13-0.0626%8 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0929%8 Aug
cache8–13-0.0522%2 Aug
dust213–70.0527%2 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0318%2 Aug
dust29–130.0229%2 Aug
dust25–13-0.0415%2 Aug
mirage13–70.007%2 Aug
nuke16–14-0.0120%2 Aug
mirage13–110.1020%2 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0721%1 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0816%1 Aug
anubis13–80.0020%1 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0323%1 Aug
cache13–30.0437%1 Aug
ancient13–70.0343%1 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0324%1 Aug
ancient13–20.0424%1 Aug
anubis7–130.0217%1 Aug
ancient13–4-0.0029%1 Aug
cache16–14-0.0124%31 Jul
inferno3–13-0.0741%31 Jul
anubis16–14-0.0127%31 Jul
cache13–80.0129%31 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0333%31 Jul
nuke16–130.0423%31 Jul
mirage13–100.0026%31 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0337%31 Jul
ancient9–130.0021%31 Jul
mirage13–100.0526%31 Jul
anubis8–130.0419%31 Jul
nuke15–15-0.0322%30 Jul
mirage3–13-0.1016%29 Jul
anubis13–8-0.0024%29 Jul
dust28–13-0.0422%29 Jul
dust216–14-0.0722%26 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0323%26 Jul
mirage13–90.0630%26 Jul
dust213–70.0421%25 Jul
nuke9–130.0135%25 Jul
cache10–13-0.0220%25 Jul
cache13–80.0020%25 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0221%24 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0420%24 Jul
ancient2–13-0.0532%24 Jul
dust212–16-0.0933%24 Jul
mirage16–13-0.0120%24 Jul
dust213–8-0.009%24 Jul
mirage13–30.1842%21 Jul
mirage14–16-0.0320%21 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0214%21 Jul
anubis13–70.0415%19 Jul
cache13–80.0221%19 Jul
mirage13–100.0122%19 Jul
mirage8–130.0125%18 Jul
dust213–16-0.0217%16 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0624%16 Jul
cache13–8-0.0013%16 Jul
dust213–60.0323%16 Jul
anubis9–130.0222%16 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0519%14 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0628%14 Jul
anubis2–13-0.0810%14 Jul
cache13–11-0.0024%12 Jul
anubis13–10-0.0527%11 Jul
mirage10–130.0019%11 Jul
ancient13–9-0.008%11 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0323%10 Jul
anubis13–7-0.0322%10 Jul
dust213–80.0521%10 Jul
cache5–130.0221%9 Jul
cache13–40.1224%9 Jul
mirage13–110.0024%9 Jul
cache13–16-0.0124%9 Jul
dust28–13-0.0429%9 Jul
dust213–70.0617%9 Jul
ancient13–40.0529%9 Jul
ancient16–130.0219%5 Jul
mirage4–130.0028%5 Jul
cache10–20.0127%3 Jul
dust216–190.0316%3 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0117%30 Jun
anubis28–25-0.019%26 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0326%24 Jun
mirage13–110.0131%23 Jun
dust28–13-0.0619%23 Jun
mirage16–13-0.0425%22 Jun
mirage13–8-0.0218%21 Jun
anubis13–7-0.0023%20 Jun
ancient13–16-0.0321%20 Jun
dust25–13-0.0214%20 Jun
mirage10–13-0.0320%20 Jun
dust213–70.0213%14 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 101,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →