isa — CS2 Stats

76561198048442564[U:1:88176836]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,575Tracked matches46%Win rate2022Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.1 DevelopingPassive Rifler

Premier CS Rating20,989Top 50% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.4% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#12285 of 35563 tracked

FaceitLevel 5 · 1,129 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim66

Positioning42

Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY43–51–6Last 10043%Win rateLWWWLWLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.6

Aggression3.7

Utility5.5

Positioning4.2

Opening Duels1.1

Clutch1.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 45% on CT to 24% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.6

Positioning4.2

Utility5.5

Mechanics5.5

Opening Duels1.8

Win Impact3.8

Composite 5.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.00

first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01

Reaction time553ms−32ms

first ⅓ avg 585ms → last ⅓ avg 553ms

Headshot accuracy12.2%−0.6%

first ⅓ avg 12.8% → last ⅓ avg 12.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.09Best rating — dust2 5–0

13–1Biggest win — ancient

3Longest win streak

7–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

4Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 62% over 13nukeWeakest map · 20% over 5

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	B	31	16–15	52%	-0.01
mirage	D	25	7–18	28%	-0.03
cache	C	15	6–9	40%	-0.01
ancient	A	13	8–5	62%	0.01
inferno	B	6	3–3	50%	-0.00
nuke	D	5	1–4	20%	-0.03
anubis	—	3	1–2	33%	0.01
train	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.10
office	—	1	1–0	100%	0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

41Matches

49%Win rate

1.10Avg K/D

83.6ADR

39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

29%1v1 clutch win

13%1v2 clutch win

8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	10	50%	1.21	17.5
Inferno	7	71%	1.28	13.7
Dust2	7	71%	1.04	16.9
Ancient	5	40%	1.06	17.6
Overpass	2	50%	0.70	15.0
Nuke	2	0%	0.82	12.5
Train	1	100%	1.90	19.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

12.6%Headshot accuracy

34.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

40.5%Spray accuracy

74.7%Counter-strafing

9.4°Preaim

550msReaction time

24.2%T opening success

44.7%CT opening success

0.65Enemies flashed / flash

5.0%Flash assists

7.42HE damage / grenade

14.23Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Best CS2 Crosshair
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 12.6107% — below the 15% mark we flag
Aim Training →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 24.1802% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	5–13	-0.08	12%	28 Aug →
cache	13–5	-0.02	6%	28 Aug →
dust2	13–4	-0.01	20%	28 Aug →
cache	13–9	0.06	14%	28 Aug →
anubis	6–13	0.03	14%	27 Aug →
inferno	13–3	0.02	6%	27 Aug →
mirage	5–13	-0.09	8%	27 Aug →
cache	13–9	0.03	11%	27 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.04	14%	27 Aug →
cache	9–13	-0.01	22%	27 Aug →
mirage	14–16	0.00	12%	27 Aug →
cache	9–13	-0.03	14%	27 Aug →
nuke	13–10	-0.06	11%	27 Aug →
cache	14–16	0.01	14%	27 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.02	11%	26 Aug →
ancient	13–11	0.01	5%	26 Aug →
cache	4–13	-0.07	16%	26 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.01	35%	26 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.02	6%	26 Aug →
dust2	5–0	0.09	0%	26 Aug →
mirage	12–12	-0.04	19%	25 Aug →
dust2	13–3	-0.04	7%	25 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.07	14%	23 Aug →
mirage	13–5	-0.04	6%	23 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.04	18%	23 Aug →
anubis	13–6	0.06	18%	23 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.08	15%	23 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.01	7%	23 Aug →
ancient	15–15	-0.01	5%	23 Aug →
nuke	3–13	-0.10	7%	22 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.03	13%	22 Aug →
mirage	13–4	0.02	9%	22 Aug →
ancient	13–7	0.06	13%	19 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.07	4%	18 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.04	18%	18 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.03	5%	18 Aug →
ancient	9–13	0.00	7%	18 Aug →
cache	13–11	-0.02	4%	18 Aug →
cache	13–6	0.02	13%	18 Aug →
nuke	7–13	-0.04	11%	18 Aug →
mirage	13–11	-0.09	13%	18 Aug →
ancient	13–7	0.01	15%	18 Aug →
mirage	5–13	0.01	18%	18 Aug →
cache	9–13	-0.04	15%	16 Aug →
nuke	11–13	0.01	8%	16 Aug →
ancient	10–13	-0.01	23%	16 Aug →
inferno	9–13	0.01	10%	15 Aug →
mirage	6–13	-0.06	8%	15 Aug →
cache	4–13	0.00	13%	15 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.04	13%	15 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.01	16%	15 Aug →
cache	4–13	0.01	13%	15 Aug →
train	7–13	-0.10	17%	15 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.04	26%	15 Aug →
dust2	13–4	0.05	22%	15 Aug →
dust2	12–12	-0.00	28%	15 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.07	13%	15 Aug →
dust2	2–13	-0.03	8%	15 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.04	13%	15 Aug →
ancient	13–9	-0.01	12%	15 Aug →
dust2	13–4	-0.10	7%	15 Aug →
mirage	5–13	-0.07	10%	15 Aug →
dust2	5–13	-0.04	8%	14 Aug →
cache	13–4	0.00	8%	14 Aug →
dust2	13–11	-0.05	13%	14 Aug →
anubis	12–12	-0.07	13%	7 Aug →
dust2	2–13	-0.01	21%	3 Aug →
ancient	13–11	-0.06	14%	3 Aug →
mirage	10–13	0.03	12%	3 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.10	8%	3 Aug →
nuke	9–13	0.05	18%	3 Aug →
dust2	5–13	-0.08	3%	3 Aug →
mirage	12–12	-0.02	17%	2 Aug →
ancient	13–4	0.05	16%	2 Aug →
ancient	7–13	-0.02	17%	1 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.03	7%	1 Aug →
mirage	12–16	-0.05	10%	1 Aug →
dust2	13–10	-0.01	13%	1 Aug →
inferno	4–13	-0.08	7%	1 Aug →
ancient	13–3	-0.00	10%	1 Aug →
dust2	13–3	0.08	14%	31 Jul →
ancient	13–1	0.07	17%	31 Jul →
dust2	9–13	-0.06	16%	31 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.03	13%	31 Jul →
office	13–5	0.01	12%	31 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.03	16%	31 Jul →
dust2	6–13	-0.03	13%	30 Jul →
cache	5–13	-0.08	9%	30 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.03	12%	30 Jul →
inferno	13–11	0.00	7%	30 Jul →
inferno	13–10	0.01	12%	29 Jul →
inferno	12–12	0.03	17%	28 Jul →
mirage	7–13	0.01	18%	28 Jul →
dust2	13–10	0.03	14%	28 Jul →
dust2	13–5	0.01	26%	28 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.02	10%	27 Jul →
cache	11–13	0.03	11%	27 Jul →
ancient	10–13	0.02	12%	27 Jul →
dust2	7–13	0.04	11%	27 Jul →
mirage	4–13	-0.04	9%	27 Jul →